Abstract

We study the existence of positive solutions for second-order nonlinear repulsive singular difference systems with periodic boundary conditions. Our nonlinearity may be singular in its dependent variable. The proof of the main result relies on a fixed point theorem in cones and a nonlinear alternative principle of Leray-Schauder; the result is applicable to the case of a weak singularity as well as the case of a strong singularity. An example is given; some recent results in the literature are improved and generalized.

1. Introduction

Difference systems are widely used in modeling real-life phenomena [1] and references therein. In this paper, we establish the existence positive solutions for the following nonlinear difference systems:with the boundary conditions:where , , , and , By a periodic solution, we mean a function , solving (1) and (2) and such that for all . We call boundary condition (2) the periodic boundary conditions which are important representatives of nonseparated boundary conditions. For convenience, we denote by , , and the sets of all integer numbers, natural numbers, and real numbers, respectively. For , let when . As usual, denotes the forward difference operator defined by

In particular, the nonlinearity may have a repulsive singularity at , from the physical explanation, which means that , uniformly in .

Such repulsive singularity appears in many problems of applications such as the Brillouin focusing systems and nonlinear elasticity [2].

System (1) can be viewed as a discretization of the following more general class of the Sturm singular second-order differential system:

Such systems, even in case , where they are referred to as being of Klein-Gordon or Schrödinger type, appear in many scientific areas including fluid mechanics, gas dynamics, and quantum field theory. During the last few decades, the study of the existence of periodic solutions for singular differential equations has deserved the attention of many researchers [311]. Tracing back to 1987, Lazer and Solimini [5] investigated the singular model:where are -periodic functions and the mean value of is negative, . One of the common conditions to guarantee the existence of positive periodic solution is a so-called strong force condition (corresponds to the case in (5)) [11, 12]. For example, if we consider the system:with ; the strong force condition holds for . On the other hand, the existence of positive periodic solutions of the singular differential equations has been established with a weak force condition (corresponds to the case in (5)) [1315].

From then on, some classical tools have been used to study singular differential equations in the literature, including the degree theory [6, 11, 16], the method of the upper and lower solutions [8, 17], Schauder’s fixed point theorem [14], some fixed point theorems in cones for completely continuous operators [13, 18], and a nonlinear Leray-Schauder alternative principle [19].

For the existence of periodic solutions of difference equations, some results have been obtained using the variational methods or the topological methods [1, 2025]. For example, by minimax principle, Guo and Yu [23] discussed the existence of periodic solutions for difference equation:where the nonlinearity is of superlinear or sublinear growth at infinity. Based on the method of the upper and lower solutions, Atici and Cabada [21] studied the existence of periodic solutions for difference equation:

In [26], Zhou and Liu investigated the following autonomous difference equations:

By Conley index theory, the author showed that the suitable assumptions of asymptotically linear nonlinear are enough to guarantee the existence of periodic solutions.

In this paper, we establish two different existence results of positive periodic solutions for (1) and (2) and proof of the existence of positive solutions; the first one is based on an application of a nonlinear alternative of Leray-Schauder, which has been used by many authors [19, 27, 28] and references therein; the second one is based on a fixed point theorem in cones. Our main motivation is to obtain new existence results for positive periodic solutions of the system:

Here, we emphasize that the new results are applicable to the case of a strong singularity as well as the case of a weak singularity and that does not need to be positive.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, some preliminary results will be given. In Section 3, we will state and prove the main results. We will use the notation for each , for , we write , if . We say that a function is nondecreasing if for with . For a given function defined on , we denote its maximum and minimum by and , respectively.

2. Preliminaries

For , let us denote by and the solutions of the corresponding homogeneous equations:satisfying the initial conditions:

Let

Throughout this paper, we always assume that

(H) For each

Lemma 1 (see [29]). If (H) holds, then .

Lemma 2 (see [29]). Assume (H) holds. For the solution of the problem:the formulaholds, whereis the Green’s function; the number is defined by (13).

Lemma 3 (see [29]). Under condition (H), the Green’s function of the boundary value problem (14) is positive, i.e., for .
We denoteObviously, and .

Remark 4. If , then Green’s function of the boundary value problem (14) has the form:where . If is even, a direct calculation shows that

3. Main Results

In this section, we state and prove the new existence results for (1). In order to prove our main results, the following nonlinear alternative of Leray-Schauder is needed, which can be found in [30].

Lemma 5. Assume is a relatively compact subset of a convex set in a normed space X. Let be a compact map with Then, one of the following two conclusions holds:(i) has at least one fixed point in (ii)There exist and such that LetThen, is a Banach space with the normWe takewith the normDefinewhich corresponds to the unique solution of (14), and the operator by , where

Now, we present the first existence result of the positive solution to problem (1).

Theorem 6. Suppose that condition (H) holds and . Furthermore, we assume that
(H1) For each constant , there exists a function for all such that each component of satisfies for all
(H2) For each component of , there exist nonnegative functions , , and such thatand > 0 is nonincreasing and is nondecreasing in
(H3) There exists a positive number r such that andfor all . Here,

Then, (1) and (2) has at least one positive periodic solution with for all and .

Proof. We first show thattogether with (2) has a positive solution satisfying for and . If this is true, it is easy to see that will be a positive solution of (1) and (2) with sinceSince (H3) holds, let , we can choose such that andfor all .
Fix . Consider the family of systemswhere and for each ,Problem (29) and (2) are equivalent to the following fixed point problem:for each , here, we used the factWe claim that any fixed point of (34) for any must satisfy . Otherwise, assume that is a fixed point of (34) for some such that . Without loss of generality, we assume that for some .
Thus, we haveHence, for all , we haveTherefore,Using (34), we have from condition (H2), for all ,Therefore,This is a contradiction to the choice of , and the claim is proved.
From this claim, the nonlinear alternative of Leray-Schauder guarantees thathas a fixed point, denoted by , in , i.e.,has a periodic solution with .
Next, we claim that these solutions have a uniform positive lower bound, that is, there exists a constant , independent of , such thatfor all . To see this, we know from (H1) that there exists a continuous function such that each component of satisfies for all . Now, let be the unique solution towith (2), here . Then, we havefor each , hereNext, we show that (43) holds for . To see this, for each , since and , we haveThe fact and (43) show that for each , is a bounded family on . Moreover, we havewhich implies thatThus, the Arzela–Ascoli theorem guarantees that has a subsequence, converging uniformly on to a function . Let , satisfies for all and . Moreover, satisfies the integral equation:Letting , we arrive athere, we have used the fact that is with respect to with and satisfying . Therefore, is a positive periodic solution of (1) and satisfies

Corollary 7. Assume that (H) holds, , . Then, for each with , we have(i)if , then (10) has at least one positive periodic solution for each (ii)if , then (10) has at least one positive periodic solution for each , where is some positive constant

Proof. We will apply Theorem 6. To this end, assumption (H1) is fulfilled by . If we takeand , then (H2) is satisfied.
LetThen, the existence condition (H3) becomesfor some . So, (10) has at least one positive periodic solution forNote that if and if . We have (i) and (ii).

In more general, we can obtain the following result.

Corollary 8. Assume that (H) holds and there exist functions and such that, for ,Then, for each with , we have(i)if , then (10) has at least one positive periodic solution for each (ii)if , then (10) has at least one positive periodic solution for each , where is some positive constant

By using a fixed point theorem for compact maps on conical shells [31], we established the second positive periodic solution for (1). Recall that a compact operator means an operator which transforms every bounded set into a relatively compact set and introducing the definition of a cone.

Definition 9. Let be a Banach space and let be a closed, nonempty subset of . is a cone if(i) for all and all (ii) implies

Lemma 10 (see [31]). Let be a Banach space and a cone in . Assume are open subsets of with . Letbe a continuous and completely continuous operator such that(i)(ii)There exist such that for and Then, has a fixed point in . The same conclusion remains valid if (i) holds on , and (ii) holds on .

Define

Then, one can readily verify that is a cone in .

Theorem 11. Suppose conditions (H), (H1)–(H3) hold. Furthermore, assume that the following two conditions are satisfied:
(H4) There exist continuous, nonnegative functions , and such thatwhere is nonincreasing and is nondecreasing in
(H5) There exists such thatThen, problems (1) and (2) have another one positive periodic solution with .

Proof. Let , is given by (25), then, it is easy to verify that is well defined and maps into . Moreover, is continuous and completely continuous, and let be a cone in defined by (59). Define theAs in the proof of Theorem 3.1, we only need to show that (29) has a positive periodic solution with and . We claim that(i)(ii)There exist such that for and We start with (i). In fact, if , then and for all . Fix , thus, we haveTherefore, for each ,...,N. This implies that (i) holds.
Next, we show that (ii) holds. Let , then . Suppose that there exists and such that . Since , then for all . As a result, it follows from (H4) and (H5) that, for all ,Hence, ; this is a contradiction and we prove the claim.
Now, Lemma 3.7 guarantees that has at least one fixed point with .

Let us consider again the example (10) in Corollary 7 for the superlinear case.

Corollary 12. Assume in (10) that satisfy (H), for each with . Then, for each with , where is given as in Corollary 7, problem (10) has at least two different positive solutions. To verify (H4), one may takeand . If , then the existence condition (H5) becomes

Since β > 1, the right-hand side goes to 0 as . Thus, for any given , it is always possible to find such that (67) is satisfied. Thus, (10) has an additional positive periodic solution .

Remark 13. We emphasize that our results are applicable to the case of a strong singularity as well as the case of a weak singularity since we only need . Moreover, does not need to be positive. In fact, using the assumption that the Green function is positive, one may readily verify that is equivalent to the .
Let us consider the 2-dimensional systemwith

Example 1. Assume that , , , and are positive functions, are given by (69) withThen, the results in Corollary 12 hold.

Proof. We only need show , which is equivalent toSince , a direct computation show that

4. Conclusions

In this paper, we study the periodic problem for nonlinear difference systems with a singularity of repulsive type in the case of . The proofs of main results are based on a nonlinear alternative principle of Leray-Schauder and a fixed point theorem in cones. It is interesting that the singularity is applicable to the case of a weak singularity as well as the case of a strong singularity. In the next research, we will continue to study the periodic problem to the difference systems like (10) where may have attractive singularity at , and whether the condition can be removed.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 120RC450), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11861028), and Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. BK20201447).