Table of Contents
Journal of Gravity
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 682451, 20 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/682451
Research Article

A Cosmological Model Based on a Quadratic Equation of State Unifying Vacuum Energy, Radiation, and Dark Energy

Laboratoire de Physique Théorique, IRSAMC, CNRS, UPS, Université de Toulouse, 31062 Toulouse, France

Received 26 March 2013; Accepted 17 May 2013

Academic Editor: Kazuharu Bamba

Copyright © 2013 Pierre-Henri Chavanis. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Binney and S. Tremaine, Galactic Dynamics, Princeton University Press, 2008.
  2. A. H. Guth, “Inflationary universe: a possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems,” Physical Review D, vol. 23, pp. 347–356, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. A. D. Linde, “A new inflationary universe scenario: a possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems,” Physics Letters B, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 389–393, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. A. Albrecht, P. J. Steinhardt, M. S. Turner, and F. Wilczek, “Reheating an inflationary universe,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 48, no. 20, pp. 1437–1440, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology, Harwood, Chur, Switzerland, 1990.
  6. S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology, John Wiley & Sons, 1972.
  7. E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, “Dynamics of dark energy,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1753–1935, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. A. G. Riess, A. V. Filippenko, P. Challis et al., “Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 116, no. 3, p. 1009, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. S. Perlmutter, G. Aldering, G. Goldhaber et al., “Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 517, no. 2, pp. 565–586, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. P. de Bernardis, P. A. R. Ade, J. J. Bock et al., “A flat Universe from high-resolution maps of the cosmic microwave background radiation,” Nature, vol. 404, pp. 955–959, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. S. Hanany, P. Ade, A. Balbi et al., “MAXIMA-1: a measurement of the cosmic microwave background anisotropy on angular scales of 10′-5°,” The Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 545, no. 1, pp. L5–L9, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. B. Ratra and J. Peebles, “Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field,” Physical Review D, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 3406–3427, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. A. A. Starobinsky, “How to determine an effective potential for a variable cosmological term,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters, vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 757–763, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave, and P. J. Steinhardt, “Cosmological imprint of an energy component with general equation of state,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, pp. 1582–1585, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. Ph. Brax and J. Martin, “Quintessence and supergravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 468, no. 1-2, pp. 40–45, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  16. A. Albrecht and C. Skordis, “Phenomenology of a realistic accelerating universe using only Planck-scale physics,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 84, pp. 2076–2079, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. T. Barreiro, E. J. Copeland, and N. J. Nunes, “Quintessence arising from exponential potentials,” Physical Review D, vol. 61, no. 12, Article ID 127301, 4 pages, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. L. A. Ureña-López and T. Matos, “New cosmological tracker solution for quintessence,” Physical Review D, vol. 62, Article ID 081302, 4 pages, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. P. Brax and J. Martin, “Robustness of quintessence,” Physical Review D, vol. 61, no. 10, Article ID 103502, 14 pages, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. T. D. Saini, S. Raychaudhury, V. Sahni, and A. A. Starobinsky, “Reconstructing the cosmic equation of state from supernova distances,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1162–1165, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. V. Sahni and A. A. Starobinsky, “The case for a positive cosmological Λ-term,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 373–443, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  22. V. Sahni, “The cosmological constant problem and quintessence,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 19, no. 13, pp. 3435–3448, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Pavlov, C. Rubano, M. Sazhin, and P. Scudellaro, “Analysis of two quintessence models with Type Ia supernova data,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 566, no. 2, pp. 619–622, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. V. Sahni, T. D. Saini, A. A. Starobinsky, and U. Alam, “Statefinder—a new geometrical diagnostic of dark energy,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 201–206, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Kamenshchik, U. Moschella, and V. Pasquier, “An alternative to quintessence,” Physics Letters B, vol. 511, no. 2–4, pp. 265–268, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. N. Bilic, G. B. Tuper, and R. Viollier, “Unification of dark matter and dark energy: the inhomogeneous Chaplygin gas,” Physics Letters B, vol. 535, pp. 17–21, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. J. S. Fabris, S. V. Goncalves, and P. E. de Souza, “Letter: density perturbations in a universe dominated by the Chaplygin gas,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 53–63, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. M. C. Bento, O. Bertolami, and A. A. Sen, “Generalized Chaplygin gas, accelerated expansion, and dark-energy-matter unification,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 4, Article ID 043507, 5 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. H. B. Benaoum, “Accelerated universe from modified Chaplygin gas and Tachyonic fluid,” submitted, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0205140.
  30. V. Gorini, A. Kamenshchik, and U. Moschella, “Can the Chaplygin gas be a plausible model for dark energy?” Physical Review D, vol. 67, no. 6, Article ID 063509, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. C. Bento, O. Bertolami, and A. A. Sen, “Revival of the unified dark energy–dark matter model?” Physical Review D, vol. 70, no. 8, Article ID 083519, 7 pages, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  32. U. Debnath, A. Banerjee, and S. Chakraborty, “Role of modified Chaplygin gas in accelerated universe,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 21, no. 23, pp. 5609–5617, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  33. K. Karami, S. Ghaari, and J. Fehri, “Interacting polytropic gas model of phantom dark energy in non-flat universe,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 85–88, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. P. H. Chavanis, “Models of universe with a polytropic equation of state: I. The early universe,” submitted, http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0797.
  35. P. H. Chavanis, “Models of universe with a polytropic equation of state: II. The late universe,” submitted, http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0801.
  36. P. H. Chavanis, “Models of universe with a polytropic equation of state: III. The phantom universe,” submitted, http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.1185.
  37. H. B. Sandvik, M. Tegmark, M. Zaldarriaga, and I. Waga, “The end of unified dark matter?” Physical Review D, vol. 69, no. 12, Article ID 123524, 7 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Weinberg, “The cosmological constant problem,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  39. T. Padmanabhan, Theoretical Astrophysics, vol. 3 of Galaxies and Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  40. R. R. Caldwell, “A phantom menace? Cosmological consequences of a dark energy component with super-negative equation of state,” Physics Letters B, vol. 545, pp. 23–29, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. R. R. Caldwell, M. Kamionkowski, and N. N. Weinberg, “Phantom energy: dark energy with wLTHEXA-1 causes a cosmic doomsday,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, no. 7, Article ID 071301, 4 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. B. McInnes, “The dS/CFT correspondence and the big smash,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2002, no. 8, p. 29, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  43. S. M. Carroll, M. Hoffman, and M. Trodden, “Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w be less than -1?” Physical Review D, vol. 68, no. 2, Article ID 023509, 11 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. P. Singh, M. Sami, and N. Dadhich, “Cosmological dynamics of a phantom field,” Physical Review D, vol. 68, Article ID 023522, 7 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. J. M. Cline, S. Jeon, and G. D. Moore, “The phantom menaced: constraints on low-energy effective ghosts,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, no. 4, Article ID 043543, 4 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. M. Sami and A. Toporensky, “Phantom field and the fate of the universe,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 19, no. 20, pp. 1509–1517, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. Nesseris and L. Perivolaropoulos, “Fate of bound systems in phantom and quintessence cosmologies,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, no. 12, Article ID 123529, 9 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. E. Babichev, V. Dokuchaev, and Y. Eroshenko, “Black hole mass decreasing due to phantom energy accretion,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 93, no. 2, Article ID 021102, 4 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. P. F. González-Díaz and C. L. Sigüenza, “The fate of black holes in an accelerating universe,” Physics Letters B, vol. 589, pp. 78–82, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. P. F. González-Díaz and C. L. Sigüenza, “Phantom thermodynamics,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 697, pp. 363–386, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “Final state and thermodynamics of a dark energy universe,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, no. 10, Article ID 103522, 15 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and S. Tsujikawa, “Properties of singularities in the (phantom) dark energy universe,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 6, Article ID 063004, 16 pages, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  53. H. Štefančić, “Expansion around the vacuum equation of state: sudden future singularities and asymptotic behavior,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 8, Article ID 084024, 9 pages, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  54. M. Bouhmadi-López, P. F. González-Díaz, and P. Martín-Moruno, “Worse than a big rip?” Physics Letters B, vol. 659, pp. 1–5, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. H. García-Compeán, G. García-Jiménez, O. Obregón, and C. Ramírez, “Crossing the phantom divide in an interacting generalized Chaplygin gas,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2008, no. 7, p. 16, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. L. Fernández-Jambrina, “w-cosmological singularities,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, Article ID 124004, 5 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. P. H. Frampton, K. J. Ludwick, and R. J. Scherrer, “The little rip,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, Article ID 063003, 5 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. P. Steinhardt, “Cosmological challenges for the 21st century,” in Critical Problems in Physics, V. L. Fitch and D. R. Marlow, Eds., Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  59. I. Zlatev, L. Wang, and P. J. Steinhardt, “Quintessence, cosmic coincidence, and the cosmological constant,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 896–899, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. L. Amendola and D. Tocchini-Valentini, “Stationary dark energy: the present universe as a global attractor,” Physical Review D, vol. 64, no. 4, Article ID 043509, 5 pages, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. L. P. Chimento, A. S. Jakubi, and D. Pavón, “Dark energy, dissipation, and the coincidence problem,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, no. 8, Article ID 087302, 3 pages, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  62. G. A. Monerat, G. Oliveira-Neto, E. V. Corrêa Silva et al., “Dynamics of the early universe and the initial conditions for inflation in a model with radiation and a Chaplygin gas,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 2, Article ID 024017, 11 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. C. M. Muller, “Cosmological bounds on the equation of state of dark matter,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 4, Article ID 047302, 4 pages, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  64. T. Harko, “Evolution of cosmological perturbations in Bose–Einstein condensate dark matter,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 413, pp. 3095–3104, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. P. H. Chavanis, “Growth of perturbations in an expanding universe with Bose-Einstein condensate dark matter,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 537, article A127, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar