Table of Contents
Journal of Industrial Engineering
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 841584, 22 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/841584
Research Article

A Study of Multicriteria Decision Making for Supplier Selection in Automotive Industry

Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Multimedia University, Jalan Ayer Keroh Lama, 75450 Bukit Beruang, Melaka, Malaysia

Received 8 November 2012; Accepted 29 January 2013

Academic Editor: C. K. Kwong

Copyright © 2013 Nadia Jamil et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. V. Vaidya, Impact of Thailand Floods on Automotive Industry and Supply Chain, Frost and Sullivan, 2011.
  2. C. T. Chen, C. T. Lin, and S. F. Huang, “A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 289–301, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Malaysia Automotive Association, MAA, Summary of Sales & Production Data, 2011.
  4. A. Ahmad, Market Review of 2010 and Outlook for 2011, Malaysia Automotive Association, 2011.
  5. Secretariat, ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) : An update, Association of Southeast Nation, 1999.
  6. Bernama, “DRB-Hicom's Pekan Plant to See Higher Production,” Bernama, 2009.
  7. C. Kahraman, U. Cebeci, and Z. Ulukan, “Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP,” Logistics Information Management, vol. 16, pp. 382–394, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  8. T. L. Saaty, The Analytical Hierarchy Process, McGrawHill, New York, NY, USA, 1980.
  9. T. L. Saaty, “Axiomatic foundation of the analytical hierarchy process,” Management Science, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 841–855, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  10. O. Cakir and M. S. Canbolat, “A web-based decision support system for multi-criteria inventory classification using fuzzy AHP methodology,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1367–1378, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making-Methods and Applications, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 1981.
  12. L. De Boer, L. Van Der Wegen, and J. Telgen, “Outranking methods in support of supplier selection,” European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, vol. 4, no. 2-3, pp. 109–118, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Wang, K. Fan, and W. Wang, “Integration of fuzzy AHP and FPP with TOPSIS methodology for aeroengine health assessment,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 8516–8526, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Negnevitsky, Artificial Intelligence: A Guide To Intelligent Systems, Addison-Wesley: Pearson Education Limited, Essex, UK, 2002.
  16. M. Bevilacquaa, F. E Ciarapicab, and G. Giacchettab, “A fuzzy-QFD approach to supplier selection,” Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, vol. 12, pp. 14–27, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  17. H. Deng, “Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pair-wise comparison,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 21, pp. 215–231, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  18. S. M. Ordoobadi, “Development of a supplier selection model using fuzzy logic,” Supply Chain Management, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 314–327, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. L. Saaty, “A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 234–281, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. C. Yang and B. S. Chen, “Supplier selection using combined analytical hierarchy process and grey relational analysis,” Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 926–941, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. L. Nydick and R. P. Hill, “Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure,” International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, pp. 31–36, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  22. I. Ertuğrul and N. Karakaşoğlu, “Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection,” International Journal of Advance Manufacturing Technology, vol. 39, pp. 783–795, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  23. F. Tüysüz and C. Kahraman, “Project risk evaluation using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: an application to information technology projects,” International Journal of intelligent Systems, vol. 21, pp. 559–584, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  24. A. Kelemenis, K. Ergazakis, and D. Askounis, “Support managers' selection using an extension of fuzzy TOPSIS,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 2774–2782, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. E. Bottani and A. Rizzi, “A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services,” Supply Chain Management, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 294–308, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. J. Shyur, “COTS evaluation using modified TOPSIS and ANP,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 251–259, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. F. Shipley, A. de Korvin, and R. Obid, “A decision making model for multi-attribute problems incorporating uncertainty and bias measures,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 335–342, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. O. Durán and J. Aguilo, “Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a Fuzzy-AHP approach,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1787–1794, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. T. L. Saaty, Multi-Criteria Decision Making: the Analytic Hierarchy Process-Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, R W S Publications, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 1996.
  30. C. C. Sun, “A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 7745–7754, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. P. J. M. van Laarhoven and W. Pedrycz, “A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 229–241, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. Y. Chang, Extent Analysis and Synthetic Decision, Optimization Techniques and Applications, vol. 1, World Scientific, Singapore, 1992.
  33. A. T. Gumus, “Evaluation of hazardous waste transportation firms by using a two step fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 4067–4074, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. L. Olson, “Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 40, no. 7-8, pp. 721–727, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. R. A. Krohling and V. C. Campanharo, “Fuzzy TOPSIS for group decision making: a case study for accidents with oil spill in the sea,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 4190–4197, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. T. Chen, “Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. T. Y. Chen and C. Y. Tsao, “The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 159, no. 11, pp. 1410–1428, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. Y. M. Wang and T. M. S. Elhag, “Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 309–319, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. Yong, “Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 28, no. 7-8, pp. 839–844, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J.-J. Buckley, “Fuzzy hierarchical analysis,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 233–247, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  41. U. Nirmal, B. F. Yousif, D. Rilling, P. V. Brevern, and N. Jamil, “The potential of using treated betelnut fibres as reinforcement for tribo-bio polymeric composites subjected to dry/wet contact conditions,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Natural Polymers (ICNP '10), Kottayam, Kerala, India, September 2010.
  42. U. Nirmal, N. Singh, J. Hashim, S. T. W. Lau, and N. Jamil, “On the effect of different polymer matrix and fibre treatment on single fibre pullout test using betelnut fibres,” Materials and Design, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 2717–2726, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S. Borgatti, Research Method, BA 762, May 2012.