Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Mathematics
Volume 2013, Article ID 308392, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/308392
Research Article

Hilbert Space Representations of Generalized Canonical Commutation Relations

Department of Mathematics, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan

Received 19 November 2012; Accepted 10 December 2012

Academic Editor: Stefan Siegmund

Copyright © 2013 Asao Arai. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhargen, and J. Roberts, “The quantum structure of spacetime at the Planck scale and quantum fields,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 187–220, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  2. V. Gatral, J. M. Gracia-Bondia, and F. Ruiz Ruiz, “Position-dependent noncommutative products: classical construction and field theory,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 727, no. 3, pp. 513–536, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  3. Y.-G. Miao, H. J. W. Muller-Kirsten, and D. K. Park, “Chiral bosons in noncommutative spacetime,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 08, p. 038, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  4. Y. Habara, “A new approach to scalar field theory on noncommutative space,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 211–230, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  5. A. Arai, “Representations of a quantum phase space with general degrees of freedom,” In press.
  6. A. Arai, “Hilbert space representations of quantum phase spaces with general degrees of freedom,” RIMS Kôkyûroku, vol. 1705, pp. 51–62, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  7. L. Gouba and F. G. Scholtz, “On the uniqueness of unitary representations of the non-commutative Heisenberg-Weyl algebra,” Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 87, no. 9, pp. 995–997, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Jonke and S. Meljanac, “Representations of non-commutative quantum mechanics and symmetries,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 29, pp. 433–439, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  9. K. Li and J. Wang, “The topological AC effect on non-commutative phase space,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1007–1011, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. L. R. Riberio, E. Passos, C. Furtado, and J. R. Nascimento, “Landau analog levels for dipoles in non-commutative space and phase space,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 597–606, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. J.-Z. Zhang, “Consistent deformed bosonic algebra in noncommutative quantum mechanics,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 23, no. 09, pp. 1393–1403, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  12. K. Schmüdgen, Unbounded Operator Algebras and Representation Theory, Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, 1990. View at MathSciNet
  13. C. R. Putnam, Commutation Properties of Hilbert Space Operators and Related Topics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1967.
  14. A. Arai, “Generalized weak Weyl relation and decay of quantum dynamics,” Reviews in Mathematical Physics, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1071–1109, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  15. K. Schmüdgen, “On the Heisenberg commutation relation. I,” Journal of Functional Analysis, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 8–49, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  16. K. Schmüdgen, “On the Heisenberg commutation relation. II,” Journal of Functional Analysis, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 601–671, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  17. H. P. Robertson, “The uncertainty principle,” Physical Review, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 163–164, 1929. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. I. Satake, Linear Algebra, Shokabo, Tokyo, Japan, 1974. View at MathSciNet
  19. M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics II: Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1975. View at MathSciNet
  20. A. Arai, “Representation-theoretic aspects of two-dimensional quantum systems in singular vector potentials: canonical commutation relations, quantum algebras, and reduction to lattice quantum systems,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 2476–2498, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  21. B. Fuglede, “On the relation PQQP=iI,” Mathematica Scandinavica, vol. 20, pp. 79–88, 1967. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  22. J. von Neumann, “Die Eindeutigkeit der Schrödingerschen operatoren,” Mathematische Annalen, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 570–578, 1931. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  23. M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics I: Functional Analysis, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1972. View at MathSciNet
  24. A. Arai and Y. Matsuzawa, “Construction of a Weyl representation from a weak Weyl representation of the canonical commutation relation,” Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 201–211, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet