Journal of Mathematics

Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 4346712, 11 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4346712

## Multiple-Term Refinements of Young Type Inequalities

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Box 1653, Edwardsville, IL 62026, USA

Received 2 July 2016; Accepted 10 October 2016

Academic Editor: Shaofang Hong

Copyright © 2016 Daeshik Choi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

Recently, a multiple-term refinement of Young’s inequality has been proved. In this paper, we show its reverse refinement. Moreover, we will present multiple-term refinements of Young’s inequality involving Kantorovich constants. Finally, we will apply scalar inequalities to operators.

#### 1. Introduction

The classical Young inequality states that if and , then

For , we define three functions , , and by In [1] and the references there, the following improvements of Young inequality and its reverse are discussed:where is the characteristic function defined byAnother form of Young type inequalities discussed in [1] is as follows:

Other types of improvements of the Young inequality is to use Kantorovich constants. Wu and Zhao [2] showedwhereNote that (7) improves (3), since for all . In [3], Liao and Wu improved (4) as follows:whereThe constants of the form are called Kantorovich constants.

Throughout the paper, we will use the following functions.

*Definition 1. *One defines the sequence of functions on as follows: for .

*Definition 2. *For and , we define the functions by The following multiple-term refinement of Young inequality has been recently proved in [1]. In the next section, we will present a different and simpler proof of it.

Theorem 3. *Let and be any positive integer. Thenfor .*

The above is a simplified expression of the original one in [1] which is written in rather complicated notation, but they are essentially identical. Note that the first inequalities of (3) and (4) are obtained from (13) with and , respectively.

The object of this paper is to show(1)a reverse of (13) which generalizes the second inequalities of (3) and (4),(2)multiple-term refinements of Young inequality involving Kantorovich constants which generalize (7) and (9),(3)operator inequalities related to Young inequality.

#### 2. Multiple-Term Reverse of Young Inequality

From now on, we will fix and use the following functions: for and an integer . As we will see (Lemma 4), for any integer with . Thus the interval of the characteristic function in or can include boundary points. For example, may be replaced by or .

We can express and as multipart functions as follows:For any , we can formulate explicitly.

Lemma 4. *Let and be integers. If , then*

*Proof. *We prove it by induction on . The case is obvious. Assume that . If is odd, then and by induction. Since , one hasIf is even, then and by induction. Since , we haveUsing the same argument, we can show that if , then . We omit the detailed proof.

Lemma 5. *For a positive integer , is the linear interpolation of at for .*

*Proof. *Since is a line segment on each interval for , is a line segment on for . Thus it suffices to showNote that since at , (19) holds for . We will prove (19) by induction on . Since , one hasAssume that (19) holds and . If is even, then If is odd, thenSince is the line segment joining and on , we haveBy Lemma 4, . Noting that , we can write by Thus, from (22), we deduce that

*Remark 6. *Since is concave, by Lemma 5, which proves Theorem 3 in a much simpler way, where the original proof is done by mathematical induction on .

Lemma 7. *Let be the reflection of about the point ; that is, Then each of the following is true. *(1)* for all .*(2)* is the linear interpolation of at at .*

*Proof. *Let . Sinceone derives that for , for , and . Thus we have for all . So part (1) is proved.

For the second part, it suffices to show that is the reflection of about the point ; that is,Noting that and , one gets that

*Theorem 8. For any integer and , one hasThat is, *

*Proof. *As mentioned in Remark 6, follows from the concavity of . Since and is the linear interpolation of which is convex on , .

*Note that the second inequalities of (3) and (4) can be obtained from with and , respectively. Moreover, (6) follows from the following result with .*

*Corollary 9. For any integer and , one has*

*Proof. *Replacing and by their squares in Theorem 8, we obtain that Since for all , we derive from the above that Hence (32) follows from the identity

*3. Young Inequalities Involving Kantorovich Constants*

*In this section, we will discuss multiple-term improvements of Young inequality involving Kantorovich constants. For a nonnegative integer , we define by*

*Lemma 10. For , one has*

*Proof. *Replacing by , the inequality is equivalent tofor . Taking the natural logarithm, it suffices to show thatA direct computation shows thatThus for any .

*Lemma 11. For a positive integer and , define byfor . Then one has*

*Proof. *As mentioned in the previous section, since for , in the definition of may be replaced by . We prove (42) by induction on . We have Suppose that (42) holds. Then Replacing in the first summation and in the second summation, respectively, by , one has Thus (42) holds for all positive integers .

*The following shows a multiple-term refinement of Young inequality involving Kantorovich constants.*

*Theorem 12. For , , and , one has*

*Proof. *Putting , (46) can be rewritten asBy Lemma 11, the above can be expressed byThus it suffices to show that if , thenfor . Replacing by and letting , the above is equivalent toLet . By Lemma 10, one gets that Sinceby Lemma 4, it follows that if , then and therefore (50) holds.

*Note that (46) can be written aswhich gives the first inequalities of (7) and (9) with and , respectively.*

*Now we consider a reverse inequality corresponding to Theorem 12. A given inequality of the form can be utilized to derive its reverse in many cases. For example, replacing by inwhich is the first inequality of (3), we obtainSince , the above implies the second inequality of (3). Similarly, replacing by in which is the first inequality of (4), we get Since , the above implies the second inequality of (4). In the same way, the first inequality in Theorem 8 can be used to derive which is stronger than the second inequality in the theorem. Based on such an observation, we can show a reverse inequality corresponding to Theorem 12 as follows.*

*Theorem 13. For , , and , one has *

*Proof. *Replacing by and by in (46), we have where the last inequality results from

*Note that the second inequalities of (7) and (9) follow from the above theorem with and , respectively.*

*4. Operator Inequalities*

*From now on, we use uppercase letters for invertible positive operators on a Hilbert space and lowercase letters for real numbers. The following notations will be used:(i) () denotes that is a positive (invertible positive) operator.(ii) denotes that is a positive (invertible positive) operator.For and , the -arithmetic and -geometric means of and are defined, respectively, byIn the case , we will omit the -value in them. For example, denotes .*

*The operator version of (1) is well known as follows:for and positive invertible operators and (see [4, 5] for more matrix Young inequalities). To show operator inequalities corresponding to their scalar versions, we will use the operator monotonicity of continuous functions; that is, if is a real valued continuous function defined on the spectrum of a self-adjoint operator , then for every in the spectrum of implies that is a positive operator.*

*From now on, will denote the operator version of defined in Definition 2. That is, for .*

*Theorem 14. Let and . Then*

*Proof. *For any , we have by Theorem 8. Thus, for any positive operator , we haveby the operator monotonicity of continuous functions, where is the identity operator. Note that since , we can express and by Letting and then multiplying all terms by on both sides, (67) yields (65), where can be obtained as follows:

*The following shows matrix inequalities corresponding to Corollary 9.*

*Theorem 15. Let be complex matrices. If and are positive semidefinite, then where denotes the Frobenius norm and *

*Proof. *Since and are positive semidefinite, there exist unitary matrices and such that and , where denotes the diagonal matrix whose th diagonal entry is . Letting