Applications of Cesàro Submethod to Trigonometric Approximation of Signals (Functions) Belonging to Class <svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="vertical-align:-4.5269pt" id="M1" height="16.7875pt" version="1.1" viewBox="-0.0657574 -12.2606 61.6568 16.7875" width="61.6568pt"><g transform="matrix(.017,0,0,-0.017,0,0)"><path id="g121-74" d="M495 163C480 117 462 85 444 65C421 39 387 34 332 34C290 34 256 36 236 47C218 57 213 77 213 131V526C213 612 222 616 301 622V650H40V622C122 616 128 611 128 526V126C128 41 120 34 36 28V0H489C498 31 519 126 525 157L495 163Z"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,0,0,-0.017,9.335,0)"><path id="g121-103" d="M135 536C164 536 186 560 186 587C186 617 164 639 136 639C109 639 85 617 85 587C85 560 109 536 135 536ZM252 0V26C188 32 181 38 181 106V451C138 433 90 420 39 412V388C99 379 102 374 102 312V106C102 38 95 32 32 26V0H252Z"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,0,0,-0.017,13.728,0)"><path id="g121-110" d="M169 380V459C122 440 66 423 24 416V392C86 384 90 382 90 317V-135C90 -201 81 -207 17 -213V-240H253V-213C176 -207 169 -201 169 -125V6C182 -1 208 -11 238 -12C368 12 487 109 487 260C487 358 421 449 310 449C298 449 279 444 261 433L169 380ZM169 346C196 367 237 389 269 389C341 389 403 329 403 221C403 109 347 37 263 37C228 37 191 53 169 76V346Z"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,0,0,-0.017,22.72,0)"><path id="g113-41" d="M300 -147C201 -63 143 98 143 270S200 602 300 686L282 710C136 610 70 450 70 271V270C70 89 136 -72 282 -170L300 -147Z"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,0,0,-0.017,28.657,0)"><path id="g113-223" d="M545 106L524 126C493 85 467 65 455 65C438 65 427 113 405 238C448 295 498 362 543 439L533 448L478 435C453 386 423 331 398 295H395C370 404 347 448 282 448C169 448 23 309 23 153C23 54 65 -12 128 -12C203 -12 283 70 339 155H341C360 29 380 -12 411 -12C444 -12 491 11 545 106ZM333 204C265 95 210 54 169 54C137 54 113 96 113 171C113 302 191 405 252 405C301 405 318 306 333 204Z"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,0,0,-0.017,38.405,0)"><path id="g113-45" d="M95 130C70 130 46 113 46 88C46 72 54 64 59 64C93 55 121 33 121 -3C121 -41 93 -68 44 -88L55 -117C117 -98 186 -56 186 22C186 91 131 130 95 130Z"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,0,0,-0.017,45.194,0)"><path id="g113-113" d="M570 304C570 398 525 448 414 448C385 448 343 445 312 434L329 511L321 518C297 504 262 482 244 460L233 411C195 397 159 381 128 358L135 332C160 347 189 360 224 373L111 -147C97 -210 84 -218 17 -231L13 -257L254 -247L259 -218L233 -216C183 -212 177 -202 189 -142L218 -1C238 -10 266 -12 283 -12C351 3 429 48 483 105C543 168 570 242 570 304ZM482 289C482 161 380 33 304 33C278 33 248 51 233 69L303 396C326 400 352 403 369 403C428 403 482 380 482 289Z"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,0,0,-0.017,55.371,0)"><path id="g113-42" d="M275 270C275 450 212 609 64 710L45 686C145 604 203 442 203 270S147 -63 45 -147L64 -170C213 -68 275 89 275 270Z"/></g></svg> in <svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="vertical-align:-7.2259pt" id="M2" height="18.6253pt" version="1.1" viewBox="-0.0657574 -11.3994 18.9762 18.6253" width="18.9762pt"><g transform="matrix(.017,0,0,-0.017,0,0)"><path id="g113-77" d="M541 160L512 170C485 116 462 88 439 67C411 41 376 35 318 35C272 35 238 37 224 48C207 61 205 85 212 121L290 533C305 611 308 615 391 622L397 650H139L133 622C217 615 221 612 206 533L126 118C111 41 103 34 23 26L17 0H474C489 31 528 124 541 160Z"/></g><g transform="matrix(.012,0,0,-0.012,10.948,4.134)"><path id="g50-113" d="M573 302C573 402 527 451 414 451C386 451 343 446 313 437L330 513L320 522C295 508 261 484 243 463L230 415C194 400 159 383 126 359L131 330C159 344 187 357 222 368L109 -147C96 -204 80 -214 18 -223L13 -255L256 -244L259 -212L236 -210C184 -205 180 -195 191 -141L219 -1C240 -10 268 -12 284 -12C352 4 431 48 484 104C543 166 573 240 573 302ZM481 290C481 165 381 37 305 37C280 37 249 56 235 71L302 395C328 399 353 402 372 402C427 402 481 378 481 290Z"/></g></svg>-Norm

Mittal, M. L.; Singh, Mradul Veer

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9048671

Journal of Mathematics

On this page

Abstract Introduction References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 | Article ID 9048671 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9048671

Applications of Cesàro Submethod to Trigonometric Approximation of Signals (Functions) Belonging to Class in -Norm

M. L. Mittal¹and Mradul Veer Singh¹

Academic Editor: Mohsen Tadi

Received28 Jul 2015

Revised18 Nov 2015

Accepted11 Feb 2016

Published06 Mar 2016

Abstract

We prove two Theorems on approximation of functions belonging to Lipschitz class in -norm using Cesàro submethod. Further we discuss few corollaries of our Theorems and compare them with the existing results. We also note that our results give sharper estimates than the estimates in some of the known results.

Dedicated to Professor S. C. Gupta

1. Introduction

For a given signal (function) , , let denote the partial sums, called trigonometric polynomials of degree (or order) , of the first terms of the Fourier series of at a point .

Define The trigonometric Fourier series of signal is said to be -summable to , if as .

Throughout , a linear operator, will denote an infinite lower triangular matrix with nonnegative entries and row sums 1. Such a matrix is said to have monotone rows if, , is either nonincreasing or nondecreasing in , . A linear operator is said to be regular if it is limit-preserving over the space of convergent sequences.

Note 1. In (2), behaves as a digital filter if and denote the input and output sequences of information, respectively. By taking different values of , we get a variety of digital filters, For example, if , we get a very popular digital filter known as Cesàro filter. Psarakis and Moustakides [1, p. 591] have mentioned that the digital filters are widely used in various signal processing applications. During past few decades, various techniques for designing digital filters have been suggested. It is worth mentioning that the most common techniques use, as approximation criterion, the minimization of the -measure . Thus the designing of digital filters has been recognized as an approximation problem. Here we are interested in approximations of functions in -space.

A signal (function) in is approximated by trigonometric polynomials of order (or degree) and the degree of approximation is given by . This method of approximation is called trigonometric Fourier approximation (tfa). Further nice applications of tfa can be found in [2, 3] and the references given there.

The integral modulus of continuity [4] of is defined by If, for , , then (). Throughout will denote the -norm, defined by , ().

A positive sequence is called almost monotone decreasing (increasing) if there exists a constant , depending on the sequence only, such that, for all , (). Such sequences will be denoted by and , respectively. A sequence which is either or is called almost monotone sequence and will be denoted by .

A sequence of nonnegative numbers tending to zero is called a rest bounded variation sequence or briefly [5, 6], if it has the property for all natural numbers , where is a constant depending upon only.

A sequence of nonnegative numbers is called a head bounded variation sequence or briefly [6], if it has the property for all natural numbers , or only for all if the sequence has only a finite number of nonzero terms and the last nonzero term is .

When we write that a sequence belongs to one of the above classes, it means that it satisfies some of the above conditions with respect to for all .

Let . If (), then we shall say that is an almost monotone decreasing (increasing) mean sequence, or briefly () [7].

Let . If (), then we shall say that is an almost monotone decreasing (increasing) upper mean sequence or briefly () [8].

Note 2. If () is the class of nonnegative and nonincreasing (non-decreasing) sequences, then the following inclusion relations are true [7, 8] for the above classes of numerical sequences: Also and .

Let be an infinite subset of and as the range of strictly increasing sequence of positive integers, say . The Cesàro submethod is defined as where is a sequence of real or complex numbers. Therefore, -method yields a subsequence of the Cesàro method , and hence it is regular for any . -matrix is obtained by deleting a set of rows from Cesàro matrix. The basic properties of -method can be found in [9, 10].

The notation means the greatest integer contained in .

2. Known Results

Let , , denote the th term of the Cesàro, Nörlund, and Riesz transform of the partial sums of the Fourier series of a -periodic function , respectively. In 1937, Quade [11] proved that, if , then for either (i) and or (ii) and . He also showed that, if , then . These results have been further generalized by various investigators in [5–8, 12–21]. In 2002, Chandra [13] has extended the work of Quade [11] and proved three theorems on the trigonometric approximation using Nörlund and Riesz matrices.

Mittal and Rhoades [22, 23] have initiated the studies of error estimates through tfa for the situations in which the summability matrix does not have monotone rows. Leindler [16] has extended the results of Chandra [13] without the assumption of monotonicity on the generating sequence , while Mittal et al. [17, 18] have extended some results of Chandra [13] and Leindler [16] to general matrices. Recently Deger et al. [14] have extended the results of Chandra [13] in view of Armitage and Maddox [9]. Very recently, in [19], the authors of this paper have generalized two theorems of Deger et al. [14], by dropping the monotonicity on the elements of the matrix rows. These results also generalize the results of Leindler [16] to more general -method.

Szal [8], in 2009, has obtained the same degree of approximation as in theorems proved by Leindler [16] and Chandra [13] for more general class of triangular matrices. He has proved the following theorem for the Nörlund type means.

Theorem A (see [8]). Let and be an infinite lower triangular regular matrix with nonnegative entries and row sums 1. If one of the conditions,(i), , and ,(ii), , , and ,(iii), , and ,(iv), , and ,(v), for some , and , holds, then where .

In 2012, Mohapatra and Szal [7] have proved some embedding results on the classes of sequences; few of them are given here in Note 2. Further they proved the following theorem for Riesz type means.

Theorem B (see [7]). Let and be an infinite lower triangular regular matrix with nonnegative entries and row sums 1. If one of the conditions,(i), , and ,(ii), , , and ,(iii), , and ,(iv), , , and ,(v), , , and ,(vi), for some , and , is maintained, then

In continuation of Mittal and Singh [19, 20], in this paper, we generalize the results of Mohapatra and Szal [7] and Szal [8] using more general -method to get sharper estimates as mentioned in Remark 6 (given afterwards). Further we show its connections with the existing results as corollaries.

3. Main Results

We prove the following theorems:

Theorem 1. Let and be an infinite lower triangular regular matrix with nonnegative entries and row sums 1. If one of the conditions,(i), , and ,(ii), , , and ,(iii), , and ,(iv), , , and ,(v), , , and ,(vi), for some , and , is maintained, then where , .

Theorem 2. Let and be defined as in Theorem 1. If one of the conditions,(i), , and ,(ii), , , and ,(iii), , and ,(iv), , and ,(v), for some , and , holds, then where .

Corollary 3. If , then our Theorems 1 and 2 generalize the results of Mohapatra and Szal [7] and Szal [8], respectively.

Corollary 4. If , then our Theorems 1 and 2 extend very recent results of Deǧer and Kaya [15].

Corollary 5. In view of Note 2, our Theorems 1 and 2 have been proved with the less stringent conditions than that of results in [20] where the authors have proved a theorem using , . Thus our results also generalize the earlier results of Mittal et al. [18, 19], Leindler [16], Chandra [13], and Quade [11].

Remark 6. The estimates in our Theorems 1 and 2 are in terms of and sharper than the estimates in Mittal et al. [18], Leindler [16], Chandra [13], and Quade [11] as for .

4. Lemmas

We shall use the following lemmas in the proofs of our Theorems.

Lemma 7 (see [11, p. 538]). If , for , , then, for any positive integer , may be approximated in by a trigonometric polynomial, , of order such that

Lemma 8 (see [11, p. 539]). If , for and , then

Lemma 9 (see [11, p. 541]). If , for , then

Lemma 10 (see [11, p. 541, last line]). If , for , then

Note 3. We are using sums up to in the th partial sums and and writing these sums and , respectively, in the above lemmas for our purpose.

Lemma 11. Let be defined as in Theorem 1. If either (i) or (ii) and , then, for ,

Proof. Let . Then By Abel’s transformation and using the Lagrange Mean Value Theorem to the function , on the interval , we get (i) If , that is, , then (ii) If , that is, , and , then, as mentioned above, the proof of this case runs parallel to that of case (i).

Lemma 12. Let be a trigonometric polynomial as in Lemma 7. If for some and , then

Proof. If denotes the partial sum of the first terms of the Fourier series of (as in [13, p. 14 & 21]) at , then for Thus where Using the generalized Minkowski inequality [24, p. 37], we get where .
Now using , we have .
If for some , then as . This further implies that , since, for , Using , (), and , Putting , in (22) and using Lemma 7, we get This completes the proof of Lemma 12.

Lemma 13. Let be defined as in Theorem 1. If either (i) or (ii) and . Then for ,

Lemma 14. Let be a trigonometric polynomial as in Lemma 7. If for some and , then

We omit the proofs of Lemmas 13 and 14 as they are similar to that of Lemmas 11 and 12, respectively.

5. Proofs of Main Results

5.1. Proof of the Theorem 1

Cases (i) and (ii). Since , thus, using Lemmas 8 and 11, we have This completes the proofs of (i) and (ii).

Case (iii). In view of Note 3, we use as and then, using Abel’s transformation twice,Hence by Minkowski’s inequality, we get Sincethus by Lemma 10If , then in view of (30), (32), and Lemma 8.

Cases (iv) and (v). Using Abel’s transformation, Using Lemma 9, we get Using conditions and , we get This completes the proof of case (iv).

Further, if , then we haveTherefore from (35), (37), and (as ), we get since . This completes the proof of case (v).

Case (vi). By Lemmas 7 and 12, we have Using Abel’s transformation, we get since and . This completes the proof of case (vi) and hence the proof of Theorem 1.

5.2. Proof of the Theorem 2

We omit the details as the proof is similar to that of Theorem 1. We use Lemmas 13 and 14 instead of Lemmas 11 and 12.

6. New Contribution

In classical Fourier analysis many results on tfa of functions in certain function spaces have been established using monotonicity condition on the elements of summability matrices. These results can be generalized in two possible directions. One is to use more general method and the other is to weaken the monotonicity condition. To achieve the latter aim, various generalizations of the monotonicity condition such as semimonotonicity, quasimonotonicity, , , , and were suggested by many authors from time to time. Weakening the monotonicity condition will enhance the quality of a digital filter in view of Note 1.

Motivated by these ideas we improve the results of Mohapatra and Szal [7] and Szal [8] using Cesàro submethod which in turn generalize various known results in the light of recent developments and in view of Note 2. We also note that we get sharper estimates than that of [7, 8] as for . A few more applications of sharper estimates and tfa can be seen in [18, p. 4484].

Remark 15. The study of degree of approximation of functions in other function spaces such as , weighted Lipschitz, Hölder, and Zygmund classes may be the future interest of few investigators in this direction.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

The second author is thankful to Ministry of Human Resource Development, India, for financial support to carry out this research work.

References

E. Z. Psarakis and G. V. Moustakides, “An L₂-based method for the design of 1-D zero phase FIR digital filters,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 591–601, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. K. Chen, Mathematics for Circuits and Filters, CRC Press, 2000.
J. G. Proakis, Digital Communications, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
A. Zygmund, Trigonometric Series. Volume I, II, Cambridge Mathematical Library, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1988, reprint of the 1979 edition.
L. Leindler, “On the uniform convergence and boundedness of a certain class of sine series,” Analysis Mathematica, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 279–285, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
L. Leindler, “On the degree of approximation of continuous functions,” Acta Mathematica Hungarica, vol. 104, no. 1-2, pp. 105–113, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
R. N. Mohapatra and B. Szal, “On trigonometric approximation of functions in the L_p-norm,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.5869.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Szal, “Trigonometric approximation by Nörlund type mean in L_p-norm,” Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 575–589, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
D. H. Armitage and I. J. Maddox, “A new type of Cesàro mean,” Analysis, vol. 9, no. 1-2, pp. 195–204, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
J. A. Osikiewicz, “Equivalence results for Cesàro submethods,” Analysis, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
E. S. Quade, “Trigonometric approximation in the mean,” Duke Mathematical Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 529–543, 1937.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
P. Chandra, “A note on degree of approximation by Nörlund and Riesz operators,” Matematicki Vesnik, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 9–10, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
P. Chandra, “Trigonometric approximation of functions in $L_{p}$ -norm,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 275, no. 1, pp. 13–26, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
U. Deger, I. Dagadur, and M. Küçükaslan, “Approximation by trigonometric polynomials to functions in L_p-norm,” Proceedings of the Jangjeon Mathematical Society, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 203–213, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
U. Deǧer and M. Kaya, “On the approximation by Cesàro submethod,” Palestine Journal of Mathematics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 44–56, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
L. Leindler, “Trigonometric approximation in $L_{p}$ -norm,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 302, no. 1, pp. 129–136, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
M. L. Mittal, B. E. Rhoades, V. N. Mishra, and U. Singh, “Using infinite matrices to approximate functions of class Lip(α,p) using trigonometric polynomials,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 326, no. 1, pp. 667–676, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
M. L. Mittal, B. E. Rhoades, S. Sonker, and U. Singh, “Approximation of signals of class Lip(α, p) by linear operators,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 217, no. 9, pp. 4483–4489, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
M. L. Mittal and M. V. Singh, “Approximation of signals (functions) by trigonometric polynomials in L_p-norm,” International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 2014, Article ID 267383, 6 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Mittal and M. V. Singh, “Approximation of functions of class Lip(α, p) in L_p-norm,” in Mathematical Analysis and its Applications: Roorkee, India, December 2014, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, pp. 109–120, Springer, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
R. N. Mohapatra and D. C. Russell, “Some direct and inverse theorems in approximation of functions,” Australian Mathematical Society. Series A. Pure Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 143–154, 1983.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
M. L. Mittal and B. E. Rhoades, “On the degree of approximation of continuous functions by using linear operators on their Fourier series,” International Journal of Mathematics, Game Theory, and Algebra, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 259–267, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
M. L. Mittal and B. E. Rhoades, “Degree of approximation to functions in a normed space,” Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
C. K. Chui, An Introduction to Wavelets, vol. 1 of Wavelet Analysis and Its Applications, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1992.

Copyright

Copyright © 2016 M. L. Mittal and Mradul Veer Singh. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1386

Downloads

867

Citations