Table of Contents
Journal of Medical Engineering
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 470539, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/470539
Research Article

Material Properties of the Mandibular Trabecular Bone

1Department of Structural Mechanics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem Rakpart 3, Budapest 1111, Hungary
2Department of Forensic Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 93, Budapest 1091, Hungary

Received 12 June 2014; Accepted 9 September 2014; Published 29 October 2014

Academic Editor: Hala Zreiqat

Copyright © 2014 Éva Lakatos et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Lemaitre, Handbook of Materials Behavior Models, Elsevier, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
  2. Y. H. An and R. A. Draughn, Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone–Implant Interface, CRC Press, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  3. F. Linde, “Elastic and viscoelastic properties of trabecular bone by a compression testing approach,” Danish Medical Bulletin, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 119–138, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Odgaard and F. Linde, “The underestimation of Young's modulus in compressive testing of cancellous bone specimens,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 691–698, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. B. Ashman and J. Y. Rho, “Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 177–181, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. R. Carter and W. C. Hayes, “The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. Series A, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 954–962, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Soncini, R. Rodriguez Y Baena, R. Pietrabissa, V. Quaglini, S. Rizzo, and D. Zaffe, “Experimental procedure for the evaluation of the mechanical properties of the bone surrounding dental implants,” Biomaterials, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Q. Kang, Y. H. An, and R. F. Friedman, “Mechanical properties and bone densities of canine trabecular bone,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 263–267, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. A. Goldstein, “The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 20, no. 11-12, pp. 1055–1061, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Y. Chevalier, D. Pahr, H. Allmer, M. Charlebois, and P. Zysset, “Validation of a voxel-based FE method for prediction of the uniaxial apparent modulus of human trabecular bone using macroscopic mechanical tests and nanoindentation,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 40, no. 15, pp. 3333–3340, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. E. F. Morgan, H. H. Bayraktar, and T. M. Keaveny, “Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 897–904, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. M. G. J. van Eijden, L. J. van Ruijven, and E. B. W. Giesen, “Bone tissue stiffness in the mandibular condyle is dependent on the direction and density of the cancellous structure,” Calcified Tissue International, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 502–508, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. M. O'Mahony, J. L. Williams, J. O. Katz, and P. Spencer, “Anisotropic elastic properties of cancellous bone from a human edentulous mandible,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 415–421, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. E. Misch, Z. Qu, and M. W. Bidez, “Mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the human mandible: implications for dental implant treatment planning and surgical placement,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 700–706, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. F. G. Evans and A. I. King, “Regional differences in some physical properties of human spongy bone,” in Biomechanical Studies of the Musculo-Skeletal System, F. G. Evans, Ed., p. 19, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, Ill, USA, 1961. View at Google Scholar
  16. J. H. McElhaney, J. L. Fogle, J. W. Melvin, R. R. Haynes, V. L. Roberts, and N. M. Alem, “Mechanical properties of cranial bone,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 495–496, IN5, 497–511, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. W. Pugh, R. M. Rose, and E. L. Radin, “Elastic and viscoelastic properties of trabecular bone: dependence on structure,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 6, pp. 475–485, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. M. Schoenfeld, E. P. Lautenschlager, and P. R. Meyer Jr., “Mechanical properties of human cancellous bone in the femoral head,” Medical and Biological Engineering, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 313–317, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. O. Lindahl, “Mechanical properties of dried defatted spongy bone,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. Ducheyne, L. Heymans, M. Martens, E. Aernoudt, P. de Meester, and J. C. Mulier, “The mechanical behaviour of intracondylar cancellous bone of the femur at different loading rates,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 10, no. 11-12, pp. 747–762, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. T. D. Brown and A. B. Ferguson Jr., “Mechanical property distributions in the cancellous bone of the human proximal femur,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 51, no. 1–6, pp. 429–437, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. L. Williams and J. L. Lewis, “Properties and an anisotropic model of cancellous bone from the proximal tibial epiphysis,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 50–56, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  23. M. Martens, R. van Audekercke, P. Delport, P. de Meester, and J. C. Mulier, “The mechanical characteristics of cancellous bone at the upper femoral region,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 971–983, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. J. Ciarelli, S. A. Goldstein, D. Dickie et al., “Experimental determination of the orthogonal mechanical properties, density, and distribution of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions utilizing materials testing and computed tomography,” Transactions of the Orthopedic Research Society, p. 42, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  25. T. S. Keller, T. H. Hansson, M. M. Panjabi, and D. M. Spengler, “Regional variations in the compressive properties of lumbar trabeculae,” Transactions of the Orthopedic Research Society, p. 378, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  26. S. Struhl, S. A. Goldstein, D. L. Dickie, M. J. Flynn, and L. S. Matthews, “The distribution of mechanical properties of trabecular bone within vertebral bodies and iliac crest: correlation with computed tomography density,” Transactions of the Orthopedic Research Society, p. 262, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  27. T. M. Keaveny, T. P. Pinilla, R. P. Crawford, D. L. Kopperdahl, and A. Lou, “Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 101–110, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. K. W. Luczynski, T. Brynk, B. Ostrowska, W. Swieszkowski, R. Reihsner, and C. Hellmich, “Consistent quasistatic and acoustic elasticity determination of poly-L-lactide-based rapid-prototyped tissue engineering scaffolds,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 138–144, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. K. W. Luczynski, A. Dejaco, O. Lahayne, J. Jaroszewicz, W. Swieszkowski, and C. Hellmich, “MicroCT/micromechanics-based finite element models and quasi-static unloading tests deliver consistent values for young's modulus of rapid-prototyped polymer-ceramic tissue engineering scaffold,” Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 505–528, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. Fritsch, C. Hellmich, and L. Dormieux, “Ductile sliding between mineral crystals followed by rupture of collagen crosslinks: experimentally supported micromechanical explanation of bone strength,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 260, no. 2, pp. 230–252, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. E. A. Zimmermann, E. Schaible, H. Bale et al., “Age-related changes in the plasticity and toughness of human cortical bone at multiple length scales,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 35, pp. 14416–14421, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. Malandrino, A. Fritsch, O. Lahayne et al., “Anisotropic tissue elasticity in human lumbar vertebra, by means of a coupled ultrasound-micromechanics approach,” Materials Letters, vol. 78, pp. 154–158, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. L. Cardoso, F. Teboul, L. Sedel, C. Oddou, and A. Meunier, “In vitro acoustic waves propagation in human and bovine cancellous bone,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1803–1812, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. C. Cowin and L. Cardoso, “Fabric dependence of wave propagation in anisotropic porous media,” Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 39–65, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus