Assessment of Optimized Electrode Configuration for Electrical Impedance Myography Using Genetic Algorithm via Finite Element Model

Figure 2

(a) Variation in EIM parameters with change in muscle thickness for (15 mm-30 mm-15 mm) electrode spacing and 65 mm × 7 mm surface electrode. (b) Variation in EIM parameters with change in skin fat thickness for (15 mm-30 mm-15 mm) electrode spacing and 65 mm × 7 mm surface electrode. (c) Variation in reactance due to different interelectrode distance between the sense electrodes (left) and the excitation electrodes (Right) for a model with 51 mm muscle thickness and 5 mm fat thickness and 65 mm × 7 mm surface electrode.

(a)

(b)

(c)