Research Article

Rock Load Estimation in Development Galleries and Junctions for Underground Coal Mines: A CMRI-ISM Rock Mass Rating Approach

Table 3

RMR and rock load estimation for galleries and junctions for different mines.

S. numberName of the mineDensity
(t/m3)
RMRRock load in gallery
(t/m2)
Rock load in junction
(t/m2)

For 3.6 m gallery width where roof rock density varied from 2.2 t/m3 to 2.4 t/m3
% variation of RMR and density from minimum value is up to 9.6% and 9.5%, respectively
1Huriladih2.1957.61.832.89
2Block IV2.2160.31.562.55
3Sudamdih2.461.21.592.65
4Huriladih2.2355.82.073.19

For 4.2 m gallery width where roof rock density varied from 1.27 t/m3 to 2.55 t/m3
% variation of RMR and density from minimum value is up to 75% and 87.5%, respectively
1Bagdighi2.5562.051.862.82
2Jogidih2.3861.21.852.76
3Khas Kusunda2.1858.71.992.86
4Khas Kusunda2.32631.592.44
5Damoda2.461.21.862.77
6Sendra Bansjora2.0555.82.223.07
7Dobari1.8260.41.492.19
8Tetulmari2.3760.81.882.8
9Sendra Bansjora (Bot)1.4338.073.494.22
10Gopalichack1.4843.32.943.66
11Kusunda1.3636.73.494.19
12Bagdighi1.3640.82.93.66
13East Bhuggatdih1.5242.43.133.88
14Damoda (BJ Pit)1.27363.344
15Amlabad1.4441.63.063.78
16Alkusha1.4943.22.973.69
17Nichitpur1.5442.43.173.93
18Industry1.4136.93.594.32
19Ramkanali1.4441.63.073.78
20 Mudidih (Pit number 3)1.5143.742.943.67

For 4.8 m gallery width where roof rock density varied from 1.35 t/m3 to 2.4 t/m3
% variation of RMR and density from minimum value is up to 51.4% and 76.4%, respectively
1Godhur1.48453.23.5
2South Balihari1.3942.43.273.6
3Huriladih1.3541.63.283.6
4Godhur incline1.4743.23.353.8
5Mahamaya mine, SECL1.961.21.582.2
6Churcha mine, SECL2.456.72.823.6
7Shivani mine, SECL2.1557.62.43.0
8 Baherabad mine, SECL2.26631.762.4