Research Article
Rock Load Estimation in Development Galleries and Junctions for Underground Coal Mines: A CMRI-ISM Rock Mass Rating Approach
Table 6
-test for independent samples (variables treated as independent samples).
| S. number | Group 1 versus group 2 | Mean group 1 | Mean group 2 | -value | df | (level of significance) | Remarks |
| 1. | RMR versus calculated rock load (gallery width 3.6 m) | 67.5 | 21.8 | 2.0 | 8 | 0.05 | Number of data are less | 2. | RMR versus calculated rock load (junctions) | 67.5 | 22.6 | 2.0 | 8 | 0.05 | 3. | RMR versus calculated rock load (gallery width 4.2 m) | 51.0 | 7.3 | 7.5 | 40 | 0.000000 | Number of data are good | 4. | RMR versus calculated rock load (junctions) | 51.0 | 8.1 | 7.4 | 40 | 0.000000 | 5 | RMR versus calculated rock load (gallery width 4.8 m) | 51.3 | 2.7 | 15.0 | 14 | 0.000000 | Number of data are moderate | 6 | RMR versus calculated rock load (junctions) | 51.3 | 3.2 | 14.8 | 14 | 0.000000 |
|
|