Table of Contents
Journal of Mycology
Volume 2014, Article ID 371218, 5 pages
Research Article

Antagonistic Evaluation of Bioactive Metabolite from Endophytic Fungus, Aspergillus flavipes KF671231

1Department of Biotechnology, Barkatullah University, Bhopal 462026, India
2Department of Microbiology, Barkatullah University, Bhopal 462026, India

Received 25 May 2014; Revised 14 July 2014; Accepted 15 August 2014; Published 27 August 2014

Academic Editor: Zia U. Khan

Copyright © 2014 Ankita Verma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Of the total 40 endophytic fungi isolated from foliar tissues of medicinal plant Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni, a fungal isolate, Aspergillus flavipes, was subjected to bioassay guided fractionation. The fractionation was found active against medicinal plant pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum with an inhibition zone of 29 mm in size. Further the metabolite was extracted which shows 20% growth inhibition in 24 h and 46% after 48 h, respectively. Bioassay guided chemical compound was identified as 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid, mono(2-ethylhexyl) ester. On the basis of morphological characters and rDNA sequencing of ITS region the endophyte was identified as Aspergillus flavipes which showed promising plant growth promotory properties.

1. Introduction

Bioprospecting refers to the search for novel products of economic importance from animal, plant, and microbial sources [1]. Traditionally we always relied on natural remedies for treating and healing our ailments. Natural products have been exploited for human use for thousands of years and plants have been a major source of compounds of medicinal use. Plants are found to be associated with microorganisms which are capable of producing molecules possessing remarkable biological activities. Microorganisms that live in the intercellular spaces of different parts of plants showed no evident expression of their presence and are called endophytes [2]. The relationship between plant and endophyte is considered to be mutualistic, the former being protector and feeder for the latter which in return produces bioactive substances that provide protection to plant and also enhance the growth and competitiveness of the host in nature [3].

Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, a phytopathogenic fungus, occurs worldwide and infects a wide array of plants, resulting in considerable losses. Although a significant number of natural bioactive compounds have been reported to antagonize this fungus [4], Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni; Asteraceae), an exotic annual plant originating from Paraguay, contains glucosides of a diterpenoid nature, which are used as a low-caloric sweetener in some South American and South East Asian countries [5]. The main active ingredient of Stevia is a stevioside, which is 100 to 300 times sweeter than sucrose.

Traditionally, farmers use agrochemicals to protect plants from diseases and to optimise the crop yields. Prolonged and persistence use of pesticides including fungicides and herbicides made several organisms resistant to such chemicals besides causing the environmental pollution. This present study represents a step towards understanding the endophytes as a means to develop effective biocontrol agents for Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni with broader implications for use against other crops.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

Leaves of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni (Family: Asteraceae) were randomly collected from Misrod Agricultural field, near Bhopal, India (Lg N 2309021′ and Lt E 077°27′04.3). Immediately after collection, leaves were washed with tap water and processed for isolation of endophytic fungi.

2.2. Media Preparation

Potato dextrose agar (PDA, Hi-media) was used to isolate endophytic fungi. Chloramphenicol (0.2 gL−1) was added to the medium to avoid bacterial contamination.

2.3. Isolation of Endophytic Fungi

Endophytic fungi were isolated from healthy leaves employing surface sterilization procedure [6]. Briefly, the tissues were surface sterilized with 70% ethanol for 2 min followed by treatment with 4% sodium hypochlorite for 2 min. Finally tissues were washed with sterile distilled water for 2 sec. Sterile leaves were placed on blotting sheet and cut into 5 mm pieces which were transferred to PDA plates. Plates were incubated at 28°C for 3–6 days. Hyphal tips of the developing fungal colonies were transferred to fresh PDA plates to get pure cultures.

2.4. Confrontation Bioassay

Primary screening for antagonism was done by a confrontation assay [7]. The endophyte and the pathogenic fungus (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) were cocultured on 90 mm petri dish containing PDA and incubated at 28°C for 3–5 days to check the interaction between them. A culture of the pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum was obtained from the Directorate of Soybean Research, Indore. Plates were observed regularly and antagonism was expressed by the presence of inhibition zone at the point of interaction.

2.5. Molecular Identification of Antagonistic Endophyte

Morphological identification of the organism was carried out at National Fungal Culture Collection of India (NFCCI), Agharkar Research Institute, Pune. For molecular identification, total genomic DNA of the endophytic fungus was isolated directly from actively growing mycelium growing in potato dextrose broth (PDB), using CTAB method [8]. DNA amplification was performed by PCR using primer pair ITS1: TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG and ITS4: TCCTCCGCTTGATATGC [9]. PCR was carried out according to the following protocol: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min; denaturation at 95°C for 1 min; annealing at 55°C for 45 sec; extension at 72°C for 10 min; steps 2–4 were repeated 35 times. Sequencing of PCR product was carried at Xcelris Labs Ltd, Ahmedabad. The sequenced data was subjected to BLAST algorithm and submitted to Genebank for accession number.

2.6. Plant Growth Promoting Attributes

Plant growth promoting attributes of the antagonistic endophyte such as production of IAA [10] and siderophore [11] and phosphate solubilization activity [12] was assayed both qualitatively and quantitatively.

2.7. Evaluation of Bioactivity

Bioactivity of the culture filtrate against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum was evaluated over growth and temperature.

2.8. Influence of Growth Period

A 48 h old fungal culture grown on PDA was inoculated in Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 mL PDB. The flasks were incubated at 28°C at 120 rpm for 10 d. Culture broth was recovered at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 d after incubation by centrifugation at 12000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C. A disc diffusion assay was carried out to determine the bioactivity of the culture filtrate obtained after 6 d of fungal growth.

2.9. Influence of Temperature

The Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 mL PDB were incubated at 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, and 32°C at 120 rpm for 6 d to assess the influence of temperature on bioactive metabolite. The culture filtrate was harvested and antagonistic activity of the filtrate was checked by disk diffusion assay against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.

2.10. Extraction of Antifungal Metabolite

For extraction of antifungal metabolite, the culture filtrate was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C and the culture supernatant (pH 5.8) was acidified (1 N HCl) to a final pH 2.0 [13]. The acidified filtrate was subjected to organic extraction by ethyl acetate (1 : 1 v/v). Organic extract was dried under vacuum in a rotary evaporator. The dried crude was dissolved in 2 mL of methanol. For antagonistic assay, 40 μL of methanolic extract was impregnated on sterile paper discs; MeOH coated discs were used as control. Plates were incubated at 28°C and inhibition of fungal growth was recorded after 24 h and 48 h. Growth inhibition was calculated as per the following formula: where = radial diameter of test fungus; = radial diameter of test fungus against culture.

2.11. Characterization of Bioactive Compound
2.11.1. Chromatographic Detection and Partial Purification of Bioactive Metabolite

Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on crude extracted from the culture broth of the endophyte (TLC silica gel 60, , 0.5 mm, Merk Co, Inc.). For this, the crude fraction was spotted (30 μL) on the TLC plate and chromatography was performed by employing solvent system dichloromethane: methanol (95 : 5 v/v). Spots were visualized by spraying with ceric sulphate; silica residue was extracted and centrifuged and the supernatant was transferred to a microcentrifuge tube. The silica-free supernatant was checked for antifungal activity. Preparative TLC was carried out to obtain the partial purified sample which showed antifungal activity.

2.11.2. GC-MS Analysis

GC-MS analysis was carried out at Central Instrumentation Facility JNU (New Delhi). Gas-chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of the crude was performed on a Shimadzu GCMS-QP-2010 plus system. RTx-5 Sil MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm id ×0.25 film thickness) was used for the analysis. The operating conditions of the column were as follows: oven temperature program from 80°C to 210°C at 4°C/min with holding time of 2 min and from 210°C to 300°C at 15°C/min with holding time of 5 min, and the final temperature was kept for 20 min. The injector temperature was maintained at 270°C, and the volume of injected sample was 0.3 μL, pressure 85.4 kPa, total flow 76.8 mL/min, column flow 1.21 mL/min, linear velocity 40.5 cm/sec, purge flow 3.0 mL/min, split ratio 60.0, ion source temperature 230°C, scan mass range 40–600, and interface line temperature 280°C. The identification of compounds was performed by comparing the mass spectra with data from NIST05 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, US), WILEY 8, and FFNSC1.3 (Flavour and Fragrance Natural and Synthetic Compounds) libraries.

3. Results

3.1. Confrontation Assay and Identification of Potential Antagonistic Endophytic Fungi

The confrontation assay showed strong inhibition of Sclerotinia scleretiorum and produced an inhibition zone of 29 mm after 48 h. The antagonistic endophytic fungus was identified by rDNA sequencing of ITS region wherein it showed 99% similarity with Aspergillus flavipes (accession number KF671231).

3.2. Plant Growth Promoting Attributes

Aspergillus flavipes was positive for siderophore production as evident by an orange halo on CAS medium. It solubilized inorganic phosphorus as determined by a clear zone around the culture on Pikovskaya’s agar. IAA production was confirmed by the appearance of stable pink colour when reacted with Salkowsky reagent. This fungal strain produced 7.3 μg mL−1 of IAA whereas siderophore level after 2 d was estimated at 22.72 mg mL−1; endophyte was found as a promising phosphate solubilizer (12.5 μg ml−1).

3.3. Extraction and Evaluation of Bioactivity of Metabolite

The culture filtrate from 48 h old culture inoculated with PDB showed no bioactivity on 2 d whereas an inhibition zone of 10 mm was observed on 4 d; maximum bioactivity was obtained on 6 d with zone size of 17 mm. There was reduced bioactivity with further incubation and no antagonism was obtained with 10 d old culture filtrate. The culture filtrate recovered after 6 d of incubation was acidified in the pH range (1–6). The filtrate showed maximum activity at pH 2.0, that is, 19 mm inhibition zone; zone size was reduced to 9 mm at pH 4.0.

The inhibitory activity of the culture filtrate was maximum at 28°C, that is, 15 mm inhibition zone; a 10 mm zone was obtained at 24°C whereas there was further reduction at 30–32°C. During the temperature dependent incubation, biomass was constantly increased up to 28°C (0.5–1.02 g dry wt/100 mL) followed by a decline (Figure 1). The metabolite was extracted through ethyl acetate. The dried extract was dissolved in methanol and subjected to disk diffusion assay. Percent growth inhibition against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum was 20.45% after 24 h and 46.2% after 48 h (Figure 2).

Figure 1: Effect of temperature on biomass and inhibition zone (mm). The inhibitory activity of the culture filtrate was maximum at 28°C whereas there was further reduction at 30–32°C. During the temperature dependent incubation, biomass was constantly increased up to 28°C followed by a decline as the temperature increases.
Figure 2: Disc diffusion assay: (a) control plate, (b) inhibition after 24 hrs, and (c) inhibition after 48 hrs. (a) Control plate having discs impregnated with methanol. (b) Zone of inhibition observed after 24 h on plate having discs impregnated with methanolic extract. (c) Zone of inhibition observed after 48 h on plate having discs impregnated with methanolic extract.
3.4. Characterization of Bioactive Compound

Thin layer chromatographic analysis and partial purification of bioactive compound: the crude extract prepared from the cell-free culture filtrates showed strong antagonistic activity against the pathogenic fungus S. sclerotiorum. No inhibitory activity was observed in the supernatant. The crude extract was subjected to TLC analysis for the separation of the antifungal molecule. Two fractions designated as 1st and 2nd were observed when developed in dichloromethane: methanol (95 : 5) on silica gel TLC plates and sprayed with ceric sulphate. These were eluted out and checked for antifungal activity; only 2nd fraction having exhibited the antifungal activity. The spot showed purplish colour when sprayed with ceric sulphate. Preparative TLC was carried out to obtain sufficient crude material for further analysis.

3.5. GC-MS Analysis

The crude extract was partially purified by TLC analysis. The partially purified crude was subjected to GC-MS analysis which showed one sharp peak at RT 14.648 which covers maximum % area (Table 1). This matched at 98% level in the standard library (NIST) with 1,2-benzene dicarboxylic acid, mono(2-ethylhexyl) ester. The antifungal property is likely to be due to this compound (Figure 3).

Table 1: Percentage area covered by the antifungal compounds.
Figure 3: Mass spectrum of 1,2-benzene dicarboxylic acid, mono(2-ethylhexyl) ester compound from NIST Library.

4. Discussion

Anitha et al. [14] recently reported occurrence of an endophyte from the stem of endemic medicinal plants of Tirumala hills while others have earlier reported A. flavipes from inner bark of Acanthus ilicifolius [15]. Endophytic presence of A. flavipes has also been recorded in flowers of Calotropis gigantea [16]. However, to the best of our knowledge this is the first report on A. flavipes from the foliar tissues of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni, a medicinal plant. Sclerotina sclerotiorum is the world’s most successful and omnivorous fungal pathogen with a host range of more than 400 plant species. Despite decades of dedicated efforts, resistant germplasm is still lacking in economically important crops. This was an important reason for screening antagonistic endophytes against this phytopathogen for current study. Matroudi et al. [17] screened three species of Trichoderma spp. which showed 85% growth reduction of Sclerotina sclerotiorum in dual culture assay. Rocha et al. [18] observed a reduction in the growth rate of S. sclerotiorum ranging from 46.7% to 50.0% by different strains of endophytic fungi isolated from Comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.). Powthong et al. [19] studied the fungal extracts of endophytic fungi for antimicrobial activity against Bacillus subtilis and Candida albicans. Evaluation of the antifungal activity of Aspergillus flavipes from Stevia rebaudiana was performed wherein it was maximum on 6th day at pH 2.0. Ethyl acetate worked as the best solvent system for extraction of metabolite. GC-MS analysis of the bioactive metabolite showed that the compound is 1,2-benzene dicarboxylic acid, mono(2-ethylhexyl) ester which showed antifungal activity against S. sclerotiorum; a similar compound along with 1-tetradecamine,N,N-dimethyl, squalene, and phytol were reported from Muscodor tigerii, as novel endophyte from Cinnamomum camphora [20]. This showed 100% inhibition of Alternaria alternata and 71.67% inhibition of Rhizoctonia solani; the compounds were also active against Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus. Present investigation was carried out against S. sclerotiorum which showed 20% growth inhibition in 24 h and 46% growth inhibition in 48 h. We also recovered Alternaria alternata as endophyte from healthy leaves of Stevia rebaudiana. However, production of 1,2-benzene dicarboxylic acid, mono(2-ethylhexyl) ester produced by Aspergillus flavipes might prevent Alternaria alternata to cause infection in Stevia rebaudiana although leaf spot disease caused by A. alternata in Stevia rebaudiana was reported [21]. A marine Burkholderia cepacia also produced 1,2-benzene dicarboxylic acid, (2-ethylhexyl) ester which showed potential antibacterial activity against Aeromonas hydrophila, Edwardsiella tarda, and Vibrio ordalii [22]. These studies showed that the compound 1,2-benzene dicarboxylic acid, (2-ethylhexyl) ester is a potential antifungal and antibacterial in endophytic fungi.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The first author is supported as Junior Research Fellowship from M.P. Biotechnology Council, Bhopal. The authors are grateful to Dr. S.K. Singh, Coordinator, National Facility (NFCCI), Pune, for identification of fungi. They are thankful to Analytical Instrumentation Facility JNU (New Delhi) for GC-MS analysis and result interpretation. The first author is extremely thankful to Dr. Ankit Kumar, Research Associate, IARI, New Delhi, for his valuable suggestions in the preparation of the paper. The authors are also thankful to Mr. Sandeep Saini and Mrs. Nidhi Gujar for their help in the conduct of this research.


  1. M. Stinson, D. Ezra, W. M. Hess, J. Sears, and G. Strobel, “An endophytic Gliocladium sp. of Eucryphia cordifolia producing selective volatile antimicrobial compounds,” Journal of Plant Science, vol. 165, pp. 913–922, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  2. H. Lu, W. X. Zou, J. C. Meng, J. Hu, and R. X. Tan, “New bioactive metabolites produced by Colletotrichum sp., an endophytic fungus in Artemisia annua,” Journal of Plant Science, vol. 151, pp. 67–73, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  3. G. A. Strobel, “Rainforest endophytes and bioactive products,” Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 315–333, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. Garg, H. Li, K. Sivasithamparam, and M. J. Barbetti, “Differentially expressed proteins and associated histological and disease progression changes in cotyledon tissue of a resistant and susceptible genotype of Brassica napus infected with Sclerotinia sclerotiorum,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 6, Article ID e65205, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. K. Goyal and R. K. Goyal, “Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana) a bio-sweetener: a review,” International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. O. Petrini, “Taxonomy of endophytic fungi of aerial plant tissues,” in Microbiology of the Phylosphere, N. J. Fokkenna and J. Van Den Heuvel, Eds., pp. 175–187, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  7. S. Gopalakrishnan, P. Humayun, B. K. Kiran et al., “Evaluation of bacteria isolated from rice rhizosphere for biological control of charcoal rot of sorghum caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1313–1321, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Sambrook and D. W. Rusell, “Rapid cloning of yeast DNA,” in Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, J. Sambrook and D. W. Rusell, Eds., pp. 631–632, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, NY, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  9. T. J. White, T. Bruns, S. Lee, and J. W. Taylor, “Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics,” in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White, Eds., pp. 315–322, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. M. Bric, R. M. Bostock, and S. E. Silverstone, “Rapid in situ assay for indoleacetic acid production by bacteria immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 535–538, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. Schwyn and J. B. Neilands, “Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 47–56, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. I. Pikovskaya, “Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in connection with the vital activity of some microbial species,” Microbiology, vol. 17, pp. 362–370, 1948. View at Google Scholar
  13. M. Grover, L. Nain, S. B. Singh, and A. K. Saxena, “Molecular and biochemical approaches for characterization of antifungal trait of a potent biocontrol agent bacillus subtilis RP24,” Current Microbiology, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 99–106, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Anitha, T. Vijaya, D. Pragathi et al., “Isolation and characterization of endophytic fungi from endemic medicinal plants of Tirumala hills,” International Journal of Life Science & Pharma Research, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 364–373, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  15. Z. Lin, G. Zhang, T. Zhu, R. Liu, H. Wei, and Q. Gu, “Bioactive cytochalasins from Aspergillus flavipes, an endophytic fungus associated with the mangrove plant Acanthus ilicifolius,” Helvetica Chimica Acta, vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 1538–1544, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Selvanathan, I. Indrakumar, and M. Johnpaul, “Biodiversity of the endophytic fungi isolated from Calotropis gigantea (L.),” Recent Research of Science and Techechnology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 94–100, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Matroudi, M. R. Zamani, and M. Motallebi, “Antagonistic effects of three species of Trichoderma sp. on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, the causal agent of canola stem rot,” Egyptian Journal of Biology, vol. 2, pp. 37–44, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  18. R. Rocha, D. E. da Luz, C. Engels et al., “Selection of endophytic fungi from comfrey (Symphytum officinale l.) for in vitro biological control of the phytopathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (lib.),” Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 73–78, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. Powthong, B. Jantrapanukorn, A. Thongmee, and P. Suntornthiticharoen, “Evaluation of endophytic fungi extract for their antimicrobial activity from Sesbania grandiflora (L.) Pers,” International Journal of Biomedical & Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 132–136, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  20. S. Saxena, V. Meshram, and N. Kapoor, “Muscodor tigerii nov.-Volatile antibiotic producing endophytic fungus from the Northeastern Himalayas,” Annals of Microbiology, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. C. K. Maiti, S. Sen, R. Acharya, and K. Acharya, “First report of Alternaria alternata causing leaf spot on Stevia rebaudiana,” Plant Pathology, vol. 56, no. 4, p. 723, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Y. M. Gohar, “Characterization of marine Burkholderia cepacia antibacterial agents,” Journal of Natural Product, vol. 3, pp. 86–94, 2010. View at Google Scholar