Table of Contents
Journal of Nanoparticles
Volume 2016, Article ID 8203260, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8203260
Research Article

Improved Synthesis of Nanosized Silica in Water-in-Oil Microemulsions

Department of Chemical Engineering, Wrocław University of Technology, Norwida 4/6, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland

Received 30 November 2015; Accepted 10 February 2016

Academic Editor: Raphael Schneider

Copyright © 2016 Tomasz Koźlecki et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Present contribution describes modified Stöber synthesis of silica nanoparticles in oil-in-water microemulsion, formulated using heptane, 2-ethylhexanol, Tween® 85 nonionic surfactant, and tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS). After some specified incubation time, ammonium hydroxide was added and the reaction mixture was stirred for 24 hours at room temperature. Prior to synthesis, pseudoternary diagram was created for oil-rich area and Winsor IV region was identified. These microemulsions were used for synthesis of silica particles. Resulting particles were characterized by dynamic light scattering, electrokinetic measurements, specific surface area measurements, and powder diffraction. Particles’ diameter was ranging between ca. 130 and 500 nm; usually monodisperse distribution was obtained. The specific surface area of nanoparticles was ranging between 250 and 300 m2/g. Notably, productivity per unit volume of solution was 3 to 5 times higher than for previously reported procedures. Our method can be extended, because polymeric materials can be added to dispersed aqueous phase. In our studies, β-cyclodextrin and hydroxyethylcellulose have been used, giving particles between 170 and 422 nm, with the surface area larger than 300 m2/g.

1. Introduction

Colloidal silica is an inorganic material of high industrial and scientific importance [1]. Its structure consists of dense, amorphous particles of SiO2; the building blocks of these particles are randomly distributed [SiO4] tetrahedrons (Figure 1). The surface of the material is coated with silanol Si–OH groups; their density depends strongly on the manufacturing process. Generally, one can distinguish five main methods to synthesize colloidal silica [2]:(a)Ion exchange, using sodium or potassium silicate [3, 4].(b)Neutralization of aqueous alkali silicates or hydrolysis of alkoxysilanes, followed by condensation [5, 6].(c)Peptization of silica gel [7].(d)Direct oxidation of silicon metal [8, 9].(e)Pyrogenic method, by burning of silicon tetrachloride in hydrogen/oxygen flame [10, 11].

Figure 1: Idealized structure of colloidal silica.

An annual production of silica by the above methods was estimated as 1.2 million metric tons [12] (data from 1990). More recent data for Western European countries show the production was 392.1 thousand tons, while the sales in 2000 were 367.95 thousand tons [13]. Approximately 80% of the above amounts are produced by method (e), and ca. 10% are produced by method (b).

Stöber method is the most important example of the hydrolysis-condensation (sol-gel) methods, widely employed to obtained silica particles of different size [5]. Typical reaction mixture includes tri- or tetralkoxysilane, alcohol, usually ethanol, water, and acid or base, the latter being usually aqueous ammonium hydroxide. For tetraethoxysilane, the reaction can be written as [14]where is usually equal to 4. Originally, micrometer-sized particles have been obtained, but nanosized ones can be synthesized using microheterogeneous medium; microemulsions seem to be particularly useful for such purpose [14, 15].

According to Danielsson and Lindman [16], the microemulsion is a system of water, oil, and an amphiphile which is a single optically isotropic and thermodynamically stable liquid solution. Generally, microemulsions form spontaneously upon mixing of amphiphile (surfactant), aliphatic alcohol (cosurfactant), hydrocarbon (oil), and water. One can consider microemulsions as a sort of emulsions, that is, droplet type dispersions either of oil-in-water (O/W) or of water-in-oil (W/O), with a size ranging between 10 and 100 nm in drop diameter, albeit there are significant differences between microemulsions and ordinary emulsions (which can be then called macroemulsions). Contrary to macroemulsions, which are kinetically stable, but thermodynamically unstable, microemulsions are thermodynamically stable and thus do not require high-energy processes to be formed [17].

A well-known classification of microemulsions is that of Winsor [18], who identified four types of phase equilibria:Winsor I. The surfactant is mainly in an aqueous phase and oil-in-water (O/W) microemulsions form. The surfactant-rich water phase coexists with the oil phase where surfactant is only present as monomers at small concentration.Winsor II. The surfactant is mainly in the oil phase and water-in-oil (W/O) microemulsions form. The surfactant-rich oil phase coexists with the surfactant-poor aqueous phase.Winsor III. It is a three-phase system where a surfactant-rich middle-phase coexists with both excess water and oil surfactant-poor phases.Winsor IV. It is a single-phase (isotropic) micellar solution that forms upon addition of a sufficient quantity of surfactant and alcohol.

Microemulsion methods provide invaluable tools to synthesize nanoparticles of different chemical nature, size, and morphology. Examples include synthesis nanoparticles of copper [19], palladium [20], cerium trifluoride [21], nickel [22], Prussian blue [23], cholesterol, Rhovanil and rhodiarome [24], and zinc sulfide [25]; some theoretical studies have been published [26, 27], as well as some general reviews [2730]. In order to obtain the particles of low polydispersity, one should consider Winsor IV system as preferable reaction medium, albeit syntheses in other systems (particularly Winsor II) are known too [3133].

Although synthesis of silica nanoparticles in water-in-oil microemulsions is well-known process [15, 34], only one type of microemulsions is usually used to carry out the process. Standard composition consists of cyclohexane, alkylphenol ethoxylate, water, and tetraethoxysilane (TEOS), and the sol-gel process is induced by the addition of an aqueous ammonium hydroxide; in many cases, medium-chain alkyl alcohol (pentanol or hexanol) was added as cosurfactant [3540]. Only Aubert et al. mention use of heptane with Brij®30 (polyoxyethylene(4) lauryl ether), to form core-shell silica particles [14]. There is also known example of using ionic surfactant, sodium salt of bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate (AOT) [41], as well as hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) or sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) [42]. Salabat et al. used dodecane and heptane/dodecane mixtures with AOT to tune stability of silica particles but did not carry out the synthesis, using commercial nanoparticles [43].

During the Stöber process in microemulsion, partial expulsion of water from the microemulsion phase may occur, resulting in formation of second phase of bulk water which, causing bimodal size distribution [44]. Detailed research on the kinetics of the process has been presented by Osseo-Asare and Arriagada [38, 45].

Present contribution describes modification of standard synthetic process. Oil-in-water microemulsion was formed using heptane, 2-ethylhexanol, Tween 85 (polyoxyethylene sorbitan trioleate), and TEOS, followed by delayed addition of aqueous ammonium hydroxide. This specific system has never been studied by any researcher, regarding the synthesis of nanoparticles. In order to find optimal conditions for the synthesis, pseudoternary diagrams were investigated for oil-rich area and Winsor IV region was identified. These microemulsions were used for synthesis of silica particles. Resulting SiO2 particles were characterized by dynamic light scattering, electrokinetic measurements, and specific surface area measurements (see Scheme 1).

Scheme 1

Our method can be extended, because polymeric materials can be added to dispersed aqueous phase. In our studies, addition of hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) and β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) has been examined.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

All reagents used were of analytical grade. Tween 85, n-heptane, hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC), β-cyclodextrin (β-CD), and tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, 2-ethylhexanol (2EH) was purchased from Acros Organics, and 25% ammonium hydroxide, 99.8% ethanol, and acetone were purchased from Avantor Chemical Poland. ASTM Type I water with specific conductivity 0.057 μS·cm−1 was produced by TKA Pacific station (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Membrane syringe filters with 0.45 μm pores made of regenerated cellulose were purchased from Macherey-Nagel.

2.2. Identification of Isotropic Region in Phase Diagrams

Nonionic surfactant was weighted into 30 mL glass vial; then an appropriate amount of n-heptane and 2-ethylhexanol was added, to obtain total volume between 10 and 20 cm3; due to the limitations of measuring instrument the volume cannot exceed 24.5 cm3. The mixture was vortexed to dissolve surfactant; subsequently, weighted amount of water was added and the dispersion was shaken vigorously for 180 s and then analyzed using Turbiscan LAb Expert instrument (Formulaction), operating in both transmission and backscattering mode. If the sample remained transparent, another portion of water was added, and the procedure was repeated until permanent turbidity has been achieved. Next portion of surfactant was then added to create isotropic solution, and then the titration with water was repeated. Results were plotted using ProSim Ternary Diagram software (ProSim).

2.3. Synthesis of Nanoparticles

An appropriate amount nonionic surfactant has been weighted into 50 cm3 polypropylene tube, followed by heptane, 2-ethylhexanol, and tetraethyl orthosilicate. Resulting mixture was shaken for 60 s with vortex, then water or 2% aqueous solution of HEC or β-CD was added, and the mixture was vortexed for 15 s, followed by vigorous magnetic stirring (800 rpm). 25% aqueous ammonium hydroxide was added after 15 minutes, tube was closed tightly, and the content was stirred magnetically (800 rpm) for 24 hours. Samples were diluted with ethanol (40 cm3) and precipitated nanoparticles were centrifuged at 4500 rpm, then washed with acetone (40 cm3), centrifuged again, and dried at 1 Torr/50°C for 6 h. The summary of experiments is given in Table 1. Three series were run, the first one with water (1W–5W), the second one with hydroxyethylcellulose (1H–5H), and the third one with β-cyclodextrin (1C–5C).

Table 1: Summary of experimental conditions for the synthesis of silica nanoparticles.

2.4. Characterization of Nanoparticles

Particle size measurements have been performed using two dynamic light scattering instruments: Nicomp 380ZLS (Particle Sizing Systems) and Photocor Complex (Photocor Instruments). The former apparatus was equipped with 532 nm/50 mW laser, and the measurements were carried out in 12.5 × 12.5 × 45 mm square polystyrene cuvettes, while the latter one was equipped with 646 nm/28 mW laser and measurements were carried out in 14.8 mm round cells submerged in a toluene as an index-matching liquid. Refractive index of heptane-2-ethylhexanol mixture was determined for sodium line using D5000α refractometer (Atago); density was measured with DMA4000 instrument (Anton Paar).

Electrokinetic potentials have been measured by means of electrophoretic light scattering, using Zetasizer 2000 apparatus (Malvern Instruments). Immediately before the measurement, dispersions of nanoparticles were diluted with pH 7.45 isotonic phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The buffer was prepared according to Sorensen, using analytical grade NaH2PO4, Na2HPO4, NaCl, and ASTM Type I deionized water and then filtered through 0.45 μm membrane. Measurements were carried out at °C, using rapid mode. The value of zeta potential reported for each sample corresponds to the average of 5 measurements.

The powder diffraction measurements have been taken with D8 Advance (Bruker) X-ray powder diffractometer with CuKα radiation ( Å). XRD data were collected over a 2θ range of 10–40° with a step width of 0.01° and a counting time of 0.2 s/step.

The surface area was measured at 77 K by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method [46] for helium/nitrogen mixture [47], using single-point FlowSorbII apparatus (Micromeritics). Prior to the measurement, samples were washed with acetone; precipitated nanoparticles were centrifuged, and the supernatant was discarded. This operation was repeated four times, and then the nanoparticles were dried in vacuo (1 Torr/50°C) for 24 hours. The mass of sample used was 1.00 g for each experiment. All experiments were run in triplicate.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Choice of Microemulsion System

We have decided to examine completely new microemulsion, composed of n-heptane, water, polyoxyethylene sorbitan trioleate (Tween 85), and 2-ethylhexanol. According to our unpublished research, heptane-based emulsions are much more stable and of better solubilization capacity. Polyoxyethylene sorbitan trioleate seems to be better choice than Triton® X-100 surfactant, because of its lower HLB [48, 49]; the literature value is 11 for Tween 85, and 13.5 for Triton X-100. Lower HLB value seems beneficial when water-in-oil system is formed, albeit it requires higher amount of surface-active agent, comparing to higher HLB compound, to obtain dispersion of the same total HLB. We believe that larger amount of surfactant may increase solubilization, making the system more capable of dispersing aqueous phase and stabilizing synthesized particles. Another factor is an environmental safety. Alkylphenol ethoxylates are consider to be harmful for environment [50]; moreover, they exhibit estrogenic activity [51, 52]. Contrary to this, sorbitan esters are considered to be much more environmentally friendly.

We have decided to use of 2-ethylhexanol as a co-surfactant [53], rather than n-pentanol and n-hexanol, commonly employed in the microemulsion synthesis of silica nanoparticles. This aliphatic chain of this alcohol is longer than the alcohols mentioned above and branched; we expected it to promote formation of water-in-oil microemulsions.

3.2. Identification of Isotropic Regions of Pseudoternary Diagrams

Determination of isotropic regions is important to avoid Winsor I–III systems. As mentioned in Introduction, synthesis should occur in Winsor IV system. This assumption led us to determination of oil-rich isotropic systems, composed of water, nonionic surfactant Tween 85, and cosurfactant 2-ethylhexanol. Measurements were carried out using combined Multiple Light Scattering (MLS) system. MLS consists of near-infrared laser (880 nm), illuminating the sample. The photons, after being scattered many times by the droplets in the dispersion, emerge from the sample and are detected by the 2 detectors: transmission () for nonopaque samples (incident angle 0°) and backscattering (BS) for opaque ones (incident angle 135°). Analysis of both and BS is carried out as a function of the position of the laser (0–55 mm, with the step of 0.040 mm), and the analysis time. Normally, transmission should be used, when at least 1-2% of the illuminating light passes through the sample; in other cases, backscattering is employed. These experiments give insight into many properties of the colloidal system, including stability of the particulate system, mean size, and concentration (volume fraction) of the dispersed phase. In our case, we have determined regions of high transparency, and the borderline between Winsor IV and Winsor II. Our research was not aimed at giving detailed insight into the ternary diagram, just to determine some useful conditions to carry out sol-gel synthesis.

Typical picture for the analysis of the pseudoternary diagram is shown in Figure 2. Transparent Winsor IV region has been defined as the one with at least 90% transmission, that is, 0, 0.1, and 0.2 g of water; 0.3 g of water gives decrease transparency to 50%, while 0.4 and 0.5 g results in complete turbidity. Typical destabilization pattern is shown in Figure 3, for the sample containing 10 g of heptane-2-ethylhexanol mixture (75 : 25, w/w) and 0.5 g of water; the total volume was ca. 13.1 cm3. An aqueous phase starts to separate almost immediately, to form finally 4 mm thick layer (1.8 cm3); this gives volume fraction of aqueous phase close to 0.135.

Figure 2: Transmission () and backscattering (BS) of 10 g of n-heptane/2-ethylhexanol mixture (75 : 25, w/w) with 0.5 g of Tween 85 upon addition of water (amount given next to the color scale, in g).
Figure 3: Destabilization of the ternary system, containing 10 g of heptane-2-ethylhexanol mixture (75 : 25, w/w), 0.5 g of Tween 85, and 0.5 g of water.

The pseudoternary diagrams are shown in Figures 47. For the sake of clarity, only parts of diagrams have been shown, for the mass fraction of Tween 85 below 0.35. In every case top corner representing pure Tween 85 is omitted. 2-Ethylhexanol is abbreviated as 2EH.

Figure 4: Fragment of ternary diagram for water/heptane/Tween 85 system. Green points: isotropic systems, red points: two-phase system.
Figure 5: Fragment of pseudoternary diagram for water/heptane-2-ethylhexanol (8 : 2, w/w)/Tween 85 system. Green points: isotropic systems, red points: two-phase system.
Figure 6: Fragment of pseudoternary diagram for water/heptane-2-ethylhexanol (7.5 : 2.5, w/w)/Tween 85 system. Green points: isotropic systems, red points: two-phase system.
Figure 7: Fragment of pseudoternary diagram for water/heptane-2-ethylhexanol (1 : 1, w/w)/Tween 85 system. Green points: isotropic systems, red points: two-phase system, and yellow points: turbid solution (%), but aqueous phase did not separate after 1 h.

One can see that, in the absence of 2-ethylhexanol, isotropic region is very narrow (Figure 4). Such system is not real microemulsion but rather contains swollen micelles. In the case of heptane to 2-etylhexanol mass ratio between 8 : 2 and 7.5 : 2.5 (w/w), relatively wide isotropic area is observed (Figures 5 and 6, resp.). Increasing amount of 2-ethylhexanol, isotropic region becomes narrow again (Figure 7), thus unusable for the synthesis of nanoparticles.

3.3. Synthesis and Analysis of Nanoparticles

Nanoparticles were synthesized similarly to literature procedure [38]. Delayed addition of ammonium hydroxide has been done according to the results of Abarkan and coworkers [40]. The work states that using this procedure, silicon species are not present in the oil phase, because the amphiphilic character of the prehydrolyzed TEOS monomers introduced in the system drives them into the droplets of dispersed phase. In our case, 15-minute delay between the addition of TEOS and ammonium hydroxide has been applied. The stirring rate between 800 and 1200 rpm was tested, but with no significant effect on the size of particles; thus we set the stirring at 800 rpm. The purification method has been taken from [40].

The yield of particles are given in Table 2. It was calculated basing on the equation given in Introduction, assuming all C2H5O– groups were replaced by –OH. The yields were moderate-to-good, with an average 77%, standard deviation of 5.3%. Some losses were probably caused by too low centrifugation speed, resulting in the incomplete sedimentation of the nanoparticles.

Table 2: Yield of silica nanoparticles.

All particles have been examined by dynamic light scattering. Typical DLS pattern is shown in Figure 8 and summary of all results is presented in Table 3. For water and HEC series, monomodal distribution is usually achieved, while in the presence of β-CD, bimodal distributions are always achieved. Moreover, the presence of β-CD affects mean size of the particles. In the case of water and HEC solution, the sizes ranged between approximately 130 and 430 nm, while for β-CD samples the mean size was 205–294 nm.

Table 3: Particle size diameter of synthesized silicas.
Figure 8: Typical particle size distribution for synthesized nanoparticles (sample 1W).

Minor component is always of smaller diameter, as shown in Figure 8. Calculations indicate that the mas or volume contribution of this minor component ranges between 5 and 11%. The diameter of smaller particles corresponds roughly to the size microemulsion droplets, as measured by dynamic light scattering (Figure 9). One can conclude that primary silica particles are of the same size as microemulsion droplets, but some coalescence occurs, resulting in the formation of much bigger particles. This observation is consistent with the mechanism proposed by Finnie and coworkers [39]. They reasoned that in basic solution particle growth occurs via coalescence growth of colliding droplets (Figure 10), resulting in formation of spherical and dense particles by the ripening of potential aggregates formed during the collision of droplets-containing nuclei. According to this paper, such mechanism gives the particles with strong mesoporous contribution and the specific area of particles below 100 m2/g. The same effect was observed by Abarkan and coworkers [40]. Our research shows that the particles’ surface area is much higher (Table 4), which indicates the presence of micropores rather than mesopores. This effect is quite unusual and should be attributed to the microheterogeneous system used. On the other hand, the specific surface area is smaller than in the case of particles formed at pH 1.05, when it reaches 510 m2/g [39]; thus one can conclude that micropores are probably larger than 1 nm. It is noteworthy that the presence of hydroxyethylcellulose results in the substantial growth of specific surface area, between 50 and 120 m2/g, compared to the samples obtained with water. Powder diffraction experiments revealed all particles were completely amorphous. An exemplary result is shown in Figure 11. Broad peak, centered at ca. 24°, indicates absence of any crystalline forms.

Table 4: Specific surface area of synthesized silicas.
Figure 9: Particle size distribution for microemulsions composed of 9 g heptane, 3 g 2-ethylhexanol, 1.5 g Tween 85, and variable amount of water. Average and standard deviation bars given.
Figure 10: Mechanism for particle formation under acidic and basic conditions. Reprinted with permission from [39]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society.
Figure 11: Exemplary powder diffraction pattern for silica sample 3W.

Electrokinetic measurements did not show any difference between samples. All samples were measured at pH 7.45 in highly concentrated isotonic buffer; the results are given in Table 5. As one can observe, no difference between samples can be observed. Relatively low negative values are due to the high ionic strength of the continuous phase [54].

Table 5: Electrokinetic potentials of silica nanoparticles at pH 7.45.

4. Conclusions

Silica nanoparticles have been synthesized in novel water-in-oil microemulsion composed of aqueous phase/n-heptane/polyoxyethylene sorbitan trioleate/2-ethylhexanol, where aqueous phase was water or 2% aqueous hydroxyethylcellulose or 2% aqueous β-cyclodextrin. Oil-rich Winsor IV region has been identified for several n-heptane/2-ethylhexanol ratios and then used to synthesize nanoparticles; the diameter was 131.5–497.4, 146.9–421.7, and 205.1–294.2 nm for water, 2% aqueous hydroxyethylcellulose, and 2% aqueous β-cyclodextrin, respectively. In some cases smaller fractions were observed; their size corresponded to the diameter of microemulsion particles. This supports observations of Finnie et al., explaining mechanism of formation of silica nanoparticles in basic solution. Surface area of the particles was much higher than expected for silicas with predominant mesopores; thus we concluded that micropores predominate. Addition of hydroxyethylcellulose resulted in significant increase of surface area, compared to the samples made in the presence of water or β-cyclodextrin.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contribution

Tomasz Koźlecki created general concept of the paper and carried out syntheses of nanoparticles. Wojciech Sawiński conducted research on pseudoternary phase diagrams. Izabela Polowczyk measured specific surface area and particle size distribution. Anna Bastrzyk measured electrokinetic potentials.

Acknowledgment

The work was supported by Wroclaw Research Center EIT+ within the project “The Application of Nanotechnology in Advanced Materials,” NanoMat (POIG.01.01.02-02-002/08), cofinanced by the European Regional Development Fund (Operational Programme Innovative Economy, 1.1.2).

References

  1. H. E. Bergna and W. O. Roberts, Colloidal Silica: Fundamentals and Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2005.
  2. R. K. Iler, The Chemistry of Silica: Solubility, Polymerization, Colloid and Surface Properties and Biochemistry of Silica, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1979.
  3. A. Yoshida, “Silica nucleation, polymerization, and growth preparation of monodispersed sols,” in The Colloid Chemistry of Silica, H. E. Bergna, Ed., pp. 51–66, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. M.-S. Tsai, “The study of formation colloidal silica via sodium silicate,” Materials Science and Engineering B: Solid-State Materials for Advanced Technology, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 52–55, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. W. Stöber, A. Fink, and E. Bohn, “Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range,” Journal of Colloid And Interface Science, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 62–69, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. I. Ab Rahman and V. Padavettan, “Synthesis of silica nanoparticles by sol-gel: size-dependent properties, surface modification, and applications in silica-polymer nanocomposites—a review,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2012, Article ID 132424, 15 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. Y.-K. Lee, Y. Rock Yoon, and H.-K. Rhee, “Preparation of colloidal silica using peptization method,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 173, no. 1–3, pp. 109–116, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. M. Lim, H. C. Shin, S. H. Huh, and S. H. Lee, “Effect of catalyst on the colloidal silica particle growth in direct oxidation of silicon,” Advances in Nanomaterials and Processing, vol. 124–126, pp. 667–670, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. W. K. Na, H. M. Lim, S. H. Huh, S. E. Park, Y.-S. Lee, and S. H. Lee, “Effect of the average particle size and the surface oxidation layer of silicon on the colloidal silica particle through direct oxidation,” Materials Science and Engineering B: Solid-State Materials for Advanced Technology, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 82–87, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. V. Khavryutchenko, A. Khavryutchenko, and H. Barthel, “Fumed silica synthesis: influence of small molecules on the particle formation process,” Macromolecular Symposia, vol. 169, pp. 1–5, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. D. Ulrich and J. W. Rieh, “Aggregation and growth of submicron oxide particles in flames,” Journal of Colloid And Interface Science, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 257–265, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. K. Ferch, “Industrial synthetic silicas in powder form,” in Colloidal Silica: Fundamentals and Applications, H. E. Bergna and W. O. Roberts, Eds., pp. 187–199, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  13. CEFIC/ASASP, Amorphous Silica Yearly Statistics Historical Data, European Chemical Industry Council, Association of Synthetic Amorphous Silica Producers, Brussels, Belgium, 2000.
  14. T. Aubert, F. Grasset, S. Mornet et al., “Functional silica nanoparticles synthesized by water-in-oil microemulsion processes,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 341, no. 2, pp. 201–208, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. F. J. Arriagada and K. Osseo-Asare, “Synthesis of nanometer-sized silica by controlled hydrolysis in reverse Micellar systems,” in Colloidal Silica: Fundamentals and Applications, H. E. Bergna and C. B. Roberts, Eds., pp. 81–89, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  16. I. Danielsson and B. Lindman, “The definition of microemulsion,” Colloids and Surfaces, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 391–392, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. K. Shinoda and B. Lindman, “Organized surfactant systems: microemulsions,” Langmuir, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 135–149, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. A. Winsor, “Hydrotropy, solubilisation and related emulsification processes. Part I,” Transactions of the Faraday Society, vol. 44, pp. 376–398, 1948. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. M. Qi, J. M. Ma, and J. L. Shen, “Synthesis of copper nanoparticles in nonionic water-in-oil microemulsions,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 186, no. 2, pp. 498–500, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C.-C. Wang, D.-H. Chen, and T.-C. Huang, “Synthesis of palladium nanoparticles in water-in-oil microemulsions,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 189, no. 1–3, pp. 145–154, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Q. Qiu, J. X. Dong, and G. X. Chen, “Synthesis of CeF3 nanoparticles from water-in-oil microemulsions,” Powder Technology, vol. 113, no. 1-2, pp. 9–13, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D.-H. Chen and S.-H. Wu, “Synthesis of nickel nanoparticles in water-in-oil microemulsions,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1354–1360, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Vaucher, M. Li, and S. Mann, “Synthesis of Prussian blue nanoparticles and nanocrystal superlattices in reverse microemulsions,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1793–1796, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. F. Debuigne, L. Jeunieau, M. Wiame, and J. B. Nagy, “Synthesis of organic nanoparticles in different W/O microemulsions,” Langmuir, vol. 16, no. 20, pp. 7605–7611, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. V. T. Liveri, M. Rossi, G. D'Arrigo, D. Manno, and G. Micocci, “Synthesis and characterization of ZnS nanoparticles in water/AOT/n-heptane microemulsions,” Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 369–373, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. Tojo, M. C. Blanco, and M. A. Lopez-Quintela, “Preparation of nanoparticles in microemulsions: a Monte Carlo study of the influence of the synthesis variable,” Langmuir, vol. 13, no. 17, pp. 4527–4534, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. A. López-Quintela, J. Rivas, M. C. Blanco, and C. Tojo, “Synthesis of nanoparticles in microemulsions,” in Nanoscale Materials, L. M. Liz-Marzán and P. V. Kamat, Eds., pp. 135–155, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  28. M. A. Malik, M. Y. Wani, and M. A. Hashim, “Microemulsion method: a novel route to synthesize organic and inorganic nanomaterials: 1st Nano Update,” Arabian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 397–417, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. Sarkar and K. C. Khilar, “Microemulsion-mediated synthesis of nanoparticles,” in Recent Advances in Nanoscience and Technology, S. Kumar and M. Mohan, Ed., pp. 25–37, Bentham Science, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  30. M. Sanchez-Dominguez, C. Aubery, and C. Solans, “New trends on the synthesis of inorganic nanoparticles using microemulsions as confined reaction media,” in Smart Nanoparticles Technology, A. A. Hashim, Ed., chapter 9, pp. 195–220, InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. A. Manna, T. Imae, T. Yogo, K. Aoi, and M. Okazaki, “Synthesis of gold nanoparticles in a Winsor II type microemulsion and their characterization,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 256, no. 2, pp. 297–303, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. B. Khomane, A. Manna, A. B. Mandale, and B. D. Kulkarni, “Synthesis and characterization of dodecanethiol-capped cadmium sulfide nanoparticles in a Winsor II microemulsion of diethyl ether/AOT/water,” Langmuir, vol. 18, no. 21, pp. 8237–8240, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. Manna, B. D. Kulkarni, K. Bandyopadhyay, and K. Vijayamohanan, “Synthesis and characterization of hydrophobic, approtically-dispersible, silver nanoparticles in Winsor II type microemulsions,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 3032–3036, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. Wang, Z. H. Shah, S. Zhang, and R. Lu, “Silica-based nanocomposites via reverse microemulsions: classifications, preparations, and applications,” Nanoscale, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 4418–4437, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. X. Fu and S. Qutubuddin, “Synthesis of titania-coated silica nanoparticles using a nonionic water-in-oil microemulsion,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 65–70, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. X. J. Zhao, R. P. Bagwe, and W. H. Tan, “Development of organic-dye-doped silica nanoparticles in a reverse microemulsion,” Advanced Materials, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 173–176, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. Nooney, C. O’Connell, S. Roy et al., “Synthesis and characterisation of far-red fluorescent cyanine dye doped silica nanoparticles using a modified microemulsion method for application in bioassays,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 221, pp. 470–479, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. F. J. Arriagada and K. Osseo-Asare, “Synthesis of nanosize silica in a nonionic water-in-oil microemulsion: effects of the water/surfactant molar ratio and ammonia concentration,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 211, no. 2, pp. 210–220, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. K. S. Finnie, J. R. Bartlett, C. J. A. Barbé, and L. G. Kong, “Formation of silica nanoparticles in microemulsions,” Langmuir, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 3017–3024, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. I. Abarkan, T. Doussineau, and M. Smaïhi, “Tailored macro/microstructural properties of colloidal silica nanoparticles via microemulsion preparation,” Polyhedron, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1763–1770, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. F. J. Arriagada and K. Osseo-Asare, “Synthesis of nanosize silica in aerosol OT reverse microemulsions,” Journal of Colloid And Interface Science, vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 8–17, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. R. Stanley and A. S. Nesaraj, “Effect of surfactants on the wet chemical synthesis of silica nanoparticles,” International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, vol. 12, pp. 9–21, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  43. A. Salabat, J. Eastoe, K. J. Mutch, and R. F. Tabor, “Tuning aggregation of microemulsion droplets and silica nanoparticles using solvent mixtures,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 318, no. 2, pp. 244–251, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. F. J. Arriagada and K. Osseo-Asare, “Phase and dispersion stability effects in the synthesis of silica nanoparticles in a non-ionic reverse microemulsion,” Colloids and Surfaces, vol. 69, no. 2-3, pp. 105–115, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. K. Osseo-Asare and F. J. Arriagada, “Growth kinetics of nanosize silica in a nonionic water-in-oil microemulsion: a reverse micellar pseudophase reaction model,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 68–76, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. S. Brunauer, P. H. Emmett, and E. Teller, “Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 309–319, 1938. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. K. Sing, “The use of nitrogen adsorption for the characterisation of porous materials,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 187-188, pp. 3–9, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. W. C. Griffin, “Classification of surface-active agents by ‘HLB’,” Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 311–326, 1949. View at Google Scholar
  49. W. C. Griffin, “Calculation of HLB values of non-ionic surfactants,” Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 249–256, 1954. View at Google Scholar
  50. C. G. Naylor, “The environmental safety of alkylphenol ethoxylate,” in Handbook of Detergents, Part B: Environmental Impact, U. Zoller, Ed., pp. 429–446, CRC Press, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  51. K. L. Thorpe and C. R. Tyler, “Estrogenic effects of the alkylphenol ethoxylates demonstrated by risk assesment and guidelines for their safe use,” in Handbook of Detergents B: Environmental Impact, U. Zoller, Ed., pp. 447–466, CRC Press, New York, NY, USA, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  52. A. C. Nimrod and W. H. Benson, “Environmental estrogenic effects of alkylphenol ethoxylates,” Critical Reviews in Toxicology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 335–364, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. P. Stilbs, K. Rapacki, and B. Lindman, “Effect of alcohol cosurfactant length on microemulsion structure,” Journal of Colloid And Interface Science, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 583–585, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. P. Leroy, N. Devau, A. Revil, and M. Bizi, “Influence of surface conductivity on the apparent zeta potential of amorphous silica nanoparticles,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 410, pp. 81–93, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus