Table of Contents
Journal of Oral Diseases
Volume 2014, Article ID 157523, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/157523
Research Article

Reliability of Pederson Scale in Surgical Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molars: Proposal of New Scale

1Dental School, Aleppo University, Aleppo, Syria
2Al Farabi College of Dentistry, Jeddah 45107, Saudi Arabia
3Al Farabi College of Dentistry, Riyadh 11691, Saudi Arabia

Received 3 April 2014; Revised 29 May 2014; Accepted 4 June 2014; Published 12 June 2014

Academic Editor: Tarek El-Bialy

Copyright © 2014 Mohamed Yasser Kharma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Bali, D. Bali, A. Sharma, and G. Verma, “Is pederson index a true predictive difficulty index for impacted mandibular third molar surgery? A meta-analysis,” Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 359–364, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. L. J. Peterson, “Principles of management of impacted teeth,” in Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, L. J. Peterson, E. Ellis, J. R. Hupp, and M. R. Tucker, Eds., Mosby, Chicago, Ill, USA, 4th edition.
  3. M. Diniz-Freitas, L. Lago-Méndez, F. Gude-Sampedro, J. M. Somoza-Martin, J. M. Gándara-Rey, and A. García-García, “Pederson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars,” British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 23–26, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  4. H. Yuasa, T. Kawai, and M. Sugiura, “Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars,” British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 26–31, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. G. Garcia, F. G. Sampedro, J. G. Rey, and M. G. Torreira, “Trismus and pain after removal of impacted lower third molars,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 1223–1226, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. O. M. Gbotolorun, G. T. Arotiba, and A. L. Ladeinde, “Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 1977–1983, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. García-García, F. G. Sampedro, J. G. Rey, P. G. Vila, and M. S. Martin, “Pell-Gregory classiffication is unreliable as a predictor of difficulty in extracting impacted lower third molars,” British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 585–587, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  8. A. J. MacGregor, The Impacted Lower Wisdom Tooth, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1985.
  9. M. Parant, Petite Chirurgie de la Bouche, Expansion Cientifique, Paris, France, 1974.
  10. R. W. de Carvalho, R. C. de Araْjo Filho, and B. C. do Egito Vasconcelos, “Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted lower third molars,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 2714–2721, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. O. Sefvan Janjua, Z. Baig, A. Manzoor, and T. Abbas, “Accuracy of Pederson and modified Parant scale for predicting difficulty level of mandibular third molars,” Archives of Orofacial Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 9–13, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. Barreiro-Torres, M. Diniz-Freitas, L. Lago-Méndez, F. Gude-Sampedro, J. M. Gándara-Rey, and A. García-García, “Evaluation of the surgical difficulty in lower third molar extraction,” Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, no. 6, pp. e869–e874, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  13. N. Komerik, M. Muglali, B. Tas, and U. Selcuk, “Difficulty of impacted mandibular third molar tooth removal: predictive ability of senior surgeons and residents,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 1062.e1–1062.e6, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar