Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Optimization
Volume 2013, Article ID 519180, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/519180
Research Article

Optimizing the Two-Stage Supply Chain Inventory Model with Full Information Sharing and Two Backorders Costs Using Hybrid Geometric-Algebraic Method

Department of Information Systems, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 78, Al-Hufof 31982, Saudi Arabia

Received 27 January 2013; Revised 12 April 2013; Accepted 19 April 2013

Academic Editor: Cedric Yiu

Copyright © 2013 Mohamed E. Seliaman. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Banerjee, “A joint economic-lot-size model for purchaser and vendor,” Decision Sciences, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 292–311, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. M. Khouja, “Optimizing inventory decisions in a multi-stage multi-customer supply chain,” Transportation Research E, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 193–208, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Ben-Daya, M. Darwish, and K. Ertogral, “The joint economic lot sizing problem: review and extensions,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 185, no. 2, pp. 726–742, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Khouja and S. K. Goyal, “A review of the joint replenishment problem literature: 1989–2005,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 186, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. K. Goyal and Y. P. Gupta, “Integrated inventory models: the buyer-vendor coordination,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 261–269, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. K. Goyal and A. Z. Szendrovits, “A constant lot size model with equal and unequal sized batch shipments between production stages,” Engineering Costs and Production Economics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 203–210, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. Lu, “A one-vendor multi-buyer integrated inventory model,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 312–323, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. K. Goyal, “A one-vendor multi-buyer integrated inventory model: a comment,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 209–210, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. K. Goyal, “A joint economic-lot-size model for a purchaser and vendor: a comment,” Decision Sciences, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 236–241, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. M. A. Hoque and S. K. Goyal, “Optimal policy for a single-vendor single-buyer integrated production-inventory system with capacity constraint of the transport equipment,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 305–315, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. L. Lee, V. Padmanabhan, and S. Whang, “The bullwhip effect in supply chains,” MIT Sloan Management Review, pp. 93–102, Spring 1997. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. R. Carter, B. G. Ferrin, and C. R. Carter, “The effect of less-than-truckload rates on the purchase order lot size decision,” Transportation Journal, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 35–45, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  13. T. L. Esper and L. R. Williams, “The value of collaborative transportation management (CTM): its relationship to CPFR and information technology,” Transportation Journal, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 55–65, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J.-M. Chen and T.-H. Chen, “The multi-item replenishment problem in a two-echelon supply chain: the effect of centralization versus decentralization,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 3191–3207, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. M. Wee and C. J. Chung, “A note on the economic lot size of the integrated vendor-buyer inventory system derived without derivatives,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 1289–1293, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. E. Cárdenas-Barrón, “Optimizing inventory decisions in a multi-stage multi-customer supply chain: a note,” Transportation Research E, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 647–654, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. W. Grubbström, “Modelling production opportunities—an historical overview,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 41, no. 1–3, pp. 1–14, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  18. M. E. Seliaman, “Using complete squares method to optimize replenishment policies in a four-stage supply chain with planned backorders,” Advances in Decision Sciences, vol. 2011, Article ID 745896, 9 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. L. E. Cárdenas-Barrón, “The derivation of EOQ/EPQ inventory models with two backorders costs using analytic geometry and algebra,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 2394–2407, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. E. Seliaman and A. Ahmad, “A generalized algebraic model for optimizing inventory decisions in a multi-stage complex supply chain,” Transportation Research E, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 409–418, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. T. Teng, L. E. Cárdenas-Barrón, and K. R. Lou, “The economic lot size of the integrated vendor-buyer inventory system derived without derivatives: a simple derivation,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 217, no. 12, pp. 5972–5977, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. S. Sana, “A production-inventory model of imperfect quality products in a three-layer supply chain,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 539–547, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. J. Chung and L. E. Cárdenas-Barrón, “The complete solution procedure for the EOQ and EPQ inventory models with linear and fixed backorder costs,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 55, no. 11-12, pp. 2151–2156, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar