Ranking All DEA-Efficient DMUs Based on Cross Efficiency and Analytic Hierarchy Process Methods

<div class="floats-full-page floats-full-page-other"><h2>Table 5</h2><div class="floats-full-page-caption">Example <a href="../../594727/#ex1">1</a>: pairwise comparison matrices of seven CCR-efficient DMUs.</div><div class="floats-full-page-content"><table class="table-group" id="tab5"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="9"><hr /></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="left"> </td><td align="center">DMU<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center">DMU<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center">DMU<sub>7</sub></td><td align="center">DMU<sub>12</sub></td><td align="center">DMU<sub>15</sub></td><td align="center">DMU<sub>17</sub></td><td align="center">DMU<sub>20</sub></td><td align="center">Weight</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="9"><hr /></td></tr><tr><td align="left">DMU<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">0.7646271</td><td align="center">0.9123273</td><td align="center">0.9171495</td><td align="center">0.7644273</td><td align="center">0.8967514</td><td align="center">1.0232103</td><td align="center">0.33493</td></tr><tr><td align="left">DMU<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center">1.3078269</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">1.0095312</td><td align="center">1.0757141</td><td align="center">0.9886519</td><td align="center">1.3569705</td><td align="center">1.1753435</td><td align="center">0.42144</td></tr><tr><td align="left">DMU<sub>7</sub></td><td align="center">1.0960978</td><td align="center"> 0.9905587</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">1.0601981</td><td align="center">0.9638027</td><td align="center">1.0423561</td><td align="center">1.0526712</td><td align="center">0.38601</td></tr><tr><td align="left">DMU<sub>12</sub></td><td align="center">1.0903347</td><td align="center">0.9296149</td><td align="center">0.9432199</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">0.9222442</td><td align="center">0.9722520</td><td align="center">1.0387729</td><td align="center">0.36912</td></tr><tr><td align="left">DMU<sub>15</sub></td><td align="center">1.3081688</td><td align="center">1.0114783</td><td align="center">1.0375567</td><td align="center">1.0843114</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">1.1905150</td><td align="center">1.1539501</td><td align="center">0.41546</td></tr><tr><td align="left">DMU<sub>17</sub></td><td align="center">1.115136</td><td align="center">0.7369356</td><td align="center">0.9593650</td><td align="center">1.0285398</td><td align="center">0.8399725</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">0.8408676</td><td align="center">0.34737</td></tr><tr><td align="left">DMU<sub>20</sub></td><td align="center">0.9773161</td><td align="center">0.8508150</td><td align="center">0.9499641</td><td align="center">0.9626742</td><td align="center">0.8665885</td><td align="center">1.1892478</td><td align="center">1</td><td align="center">0.36284</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="9"><hr class="tbody-hr" /></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></div></div>

Table 5 | Ranking All DEA-Efficient DMUs Based on Cross Efficiency and Analytic Hierarchy Process Methods

title

Table 5: Ranking All DEA-Efficient DMUs Based on Cross Efficiency and Analytic Hierarchy Process Methods

description

Table 5

About this journal

<p><em>Journal of Optimization</em> publishes research on both theoretical and applied aspects of mathematical programming and optimization methodologies in science and engineering.</p>


Journal profile

Meet the editorial board

<p><em>Journal of Optimization</em> maintains an Editorial Board of practicing researchers from around the world, to ensure manuscripts are handled by editors who are experts in the field of study.</p>


Editor spotlight

Submit your proposal

Do you think there is an emerging area of research that really needs to be highlighted? Or an existing research area that has been overlooked or would benefit from deeper investigation? Raise the profile of a research area by leading a Special Issue.