Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Optimization
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 1652928, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1652928
Research Article

Optimization of Conductive Thin Film Epoxy Composites Properties Using Desirability Optimization Methodology

School of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal, 14300 Seberang Perai Selatan, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

Received 2 December 2015; Accepted 26 January 2016

Academic Editor: Ling Wang

Copyright © 2016 C. P. Khor et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. J. F. Harris, “Carbon nanotube composites,” International Materials Reviews, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 31–43, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. H. Gojny, M. H. G. Wichmann, B. Fiedler et al., “Evaluation and identification of electrical and thermal conduction mechanisms in carbon nanotube/epoxy composites,” Polymer, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 2036–2045, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. Voo, M. Mariatti, and L. C. Sim, “Properties of epoxy nanocomposite thin films prepared by spin coating technique,” Journal of Plastic Film and Sheeting, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 331–346, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. Foo, M. Jaafar, A. Aziz, and L. C. Sim, “Properties of spin coated epoxy/silica thin film composites: effect of nano- and micron-size fillers,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1432–1437, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. W. P. Serena Saw and M. Mariatti, “Properties of synthetic diamond and graphene nanoplatelet-filled epoxy thin film composites for electronic applications,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 817–824, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Tanco, E. Viles, and L. Pozueta, “Comparing different approaches for design of experiments (DoE),” in Advances in Electrical Engineering and Computational Science, S.-I. Ao and L. Gelman, Eds., vol. 39 of Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, pp. 611–621, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. D. G. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
  8. H. Adeli, S. H. S. Zein, S. H. Tan, and A. L. Ahmad, “Optimization of the mechanical strength properties of poly(L-lactide)/multi-walled carbon nanotube scaffolds using response surface methodology,” Nano: Brief Reports and Reviews, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 113–122, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. G. C. A. Derringer, Balancing Act: Optimizing a Product's Properties, Quality Progress, 1994.
  10. J. C. Wei, D. L. Olson, and E. M. White, “Simultaneous optimization in process quality control via prediction-interval constrained programming,” The Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1161–1167, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Q. Wang, H. S. Xia, and C. H. Zhang, “Preparation of polymer/inorganic nanoparticles composites through ultrasonic irradiation,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 80, no. 9, pp. 1478–1488, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. J. Obermiller, Multiple Response Optimization using JMP®, Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Mich, USA, 2000.