|
| Row | Item | Impact | Committee score | Rasht score | Description |
|
| 1 | Fare collection management | + | 7 | 3 | Bus drivers receive tickets |
| 2 | Number of routes that leave out the corridor | + | 4 | 0 | No route leaves out the corridor |
| 3 | Frequency of bus movements at peak hours | + | 4 | 0 | Is more than 2 minutes |
| 4 | Frequency of bus movements at off-peak hours | + | 3 | 0 | Is more than 5 minutes |
| 5 | Services inside the station | + | 3 | 1 | The only service inside the station is a shoe cleaner machine |
| 6 | Control center | + | 3 | 0 | There is no control center |
| 7 | Located on the busiest route | + | 2 | 2 | It has the highest demand |
| 8 | Service times | + | 2 | 0 | It is close at late hours and on holidays |
| 9 | Multicorridor network | + | 2 | 0 | There is no particular network along the route |
| 10 | Set the route of movement | + | 7 | 4 | Too many opening sections |
| 11 | Route separation | + | 7 | 3 | Too many opening sections and the frequent presence of taxis |
| 12 | Intersection performance | + | 6 | 0 | It does not have the right of way at any intersection |
| 13 | Location of bus lanes in stations | + | 4 | 0 | Taxis and other vehicles are present |
| 14 | Minimizing bus emissions | + | 4 | 4 | All buses have passed EURO III standards |
| 15 | The station contains several intersections | + | 3 | 2 | Mikael, Farhang |
| 16 | Central station | + | 3 | 1 | Meli Bank and Mosalla |
| 17 | The quality of the pavement | + | 2 | 1 | Without reinforced concrete at the stations |
| 18 | The floor level of the bus stop | + | 6 | 6 | All stations are level |
| 19 | Comfortable and secure stations | + | 3 | 1 | Access to stations is dangerous |
| 20 | Number of bus doors | + | 3 | 2 | Includes two doors |
| 21 | Station sliding doors | + | 1 | 0 | There are not at the stations |
| 22 | Brand names | + | 3 | 0 | There is no brand in this route |
| 23 | Passengers information | + | 2 | 0 | There is no information |
| 24 | Public access | + | 3 | 3 | All stations have wheelchair access |
| 25 | Integration with other modes of transport | + | 3 | 1 | Only taxi has been integrated |
| 26 | Pedestrian access possibility | + | 3 | 1 | In most stations, pedestrian accesses are not suitable |
| 27 | Secure bike parking spaces | + | 2 | 0 | There are no bike parking spaces |
| 28 | Bike path | + | 2 | 1 | A bike path is nearby but does not have any rental bikes |
| 29 | Integration of the bike path and the bus lane | + | 1 | 0 | There is no integration between these two routes |
| 30 | Minimum average speed below 13 km/h | − | 10 | 5 | At peak hours, it is 11.7 km/h |
| 31 | Number of passengers in each direction below 1000 | − | 10 | 0 | There are more than 1000 passengers in each direction |
| 32 | Not using the right side of the bus lane | − | 5 | 2 | In most parts, there are opening sections |
| 33 | The gap between bus and station | − | 5 | 0 | There is no distance between the bus and the station |
| 34 | Bus stop invasion to the sidewalk | − | 3 | 1 | There is in Farhang |
| 35 | Overcrowding | − | 3 | 1 | There is in Meli bank station |
| 36 | Poor bus and station maintenance | − | 3 | 0 | Bus and station maintenance is desirable |
| 37 | Distance between stations is long | − | 3 | 0 | Distance between stations is desirable |
| Total score | | | | 27 | None of the grades are gained |
|
