Review Article

A Review on the Progress of Ion-Engineered Water Flooding

Table 1

Summary of the investigation.

Proposed mechanismReferenceExperiments conductedConclusions drawn

1Clay swelling and fines migrationBernard [5]Core floodingMigration of fines plugs the flow channels and creates new channels. Profile modification on pore scale. Also clay swelling which squeezes out oil from pores.

2Wettability alterationTang and Morrow [6]; Zhang and Morrow [7]Imbibition test and core floodingMore diluted brine, the oil recovery being slower at initial stage and higher at final stage.

3VariousMorrow et al. [8]; Morrow et al. [9]; Zhang and Morrow [7]; Agbalaka et al. [10]Core floodingWith decreasing salinity, oil recovery increases.

4Fines migration, MIE, EDL expansionAustad et al. [11]Zeta Potential Studies & Adsorption measurementsInitial chemical equilibrium is disturbed when LSW injected into the reservoir, which leads to detachment of oil from clay surface.

5Wettability alteration, MIELager et al. [3]; Mohanty and Chandrasekhar [12]Core floodingPDIs are the deriving ions in changing the wettability

6Wettability alteration, fines migrationYi and Sarma [13]Core flooding, spontaneous imbibitionRock can become more water wet by decreasing the salinity of brine or increasing the concentration. PDIs desorb carboxylic acids from rock surface.

7Wettability alteration, MIEAustad et al. [14]; Strand et al. [15]; Zhang and Morrow [7]Contact angle measurementsMIE is the main mechanism behind increased oil recovery from low salinity water flooding.

8Wettability alteration,Yousef et al. [4]Contact angle measurements, NMR studies. core floodingRock surface become more water wet by diluting injected sea water, 18% additional oil recovery after secondary stage with sea water.

9Wettability modificationRomanuka et al. [16]Capillary imbibition testHigher oil recovery from injection of lower ionic strength brine.

10Wettability alterationAl Quraishi et al. [17]Core flooding, zeta potential and contact angle studies17% additional oil recovery after tertiary flooding with sea water. Contact angle dropped from 102° to 70° with 10 times diluted sea water.

11Rock dissolutionYousef et al. [18]Core flooding, Zeta potential, NMRLowering Ca concentration of injected brine leads to calcium carbonate dissolution. As a result, the polar components of oil would be released from rock surface.

12Mahani et al. [19]Zeta-potential measurements, ICP-MSWith increasing pH, zeta potential is towards positive and with increasing salinity has less influence. Mineral dissolution exists with 25 times diluted SW.

13Electric double layer effectLigthelm et al. [1]; Nasralla and Nasr-EL-Din [20, 21]Zeta potential studiesBy decreasing the pH of LSW, the electric charges of oil/brine and rock/brine surfaces changed from highly negative to close to zero value, which means that the expansion of EDL was reduced.

14IFT reductionYousef et al. [4]IFT studiesSalinity of injected brine has minor impact on the IFT and fluid-fluid interactions.

15Al Quraishi et al. [17]IFT studiesBy diluting the brine up to 10 times, the interfacial tension between oil and brine reduced to only 6 units which is insignificant.