Table of Contents
International Journal of Quality, Statistics, and Reliability
Volume 2009, Article ID 670340, 10 pages
Research Article

Analysis of Parameter Sensitivity Using Robust Design Techniques for a Flatfish Type Autonomous Underwater Vehicle

1Department of Engineering Design, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India
2A.P. Moller-Maersk Group, MAERSK LINE, Prince Infocity, 11th Floor 286/1, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Kottivakkam-Kandanchavadi, Chennai 600096, India

Received 6 July 2009; Accepted 27 October 2009

Academic Editor: Suk joo Bae

Copyright © 2009 M. Santhakumar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Perrault, N. Bose, S. O'Young, and C. D. Williams, “Sensitivity of AUV added mass coefficients to variations in hull and control plane geometry,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 645–671, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Perrault, N. Bose, S. O'Young, and C. D. Williams, “Sensitivity of AUV response to variations in hydrodynamic parameters,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 779–811, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. V. Alt, “Autonomous underwater vehicles,” in Proceedings of the Autonomous Underwater Lagrangian Platforms and Sensors Workshop, pp. 1–5, Sea Lodge, La Jolla, Calif, USA, March 2003.
  4. C. Aage and L. W. Smitt, “Hydrodynamic maneuverability data of a flatfish type AUR,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Oceans Engineering for Today's Technology and Tomorrow's Preservation, vol. 3, pp. 425–430, Brest, France, September 1994.
  5. T. I. Fossen, Guidance and Control of Ocean Vehicles, John Wiley & Sons, England, UK, 1994.
  6. M. Santhakumar, T. Asokan, and T. R. Sreeram, “A 6 sigma framework for the design of flatfish type autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV),” in Proceedings of the SAE World Congress and Exhibition, SAE Paper Series, Detroit, Mich, USA, April 2009.
  7. S. H. Park, Robust Design Analysis for Quality Engineering, Chapman & Hall, London, UK, 1996.
  8. P. R. Rosenbaum, “Sensitivity analysis in observational studies,” Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science, vol. 4, pp. 1809–1814, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  9. H. C. Frey and S. R. Patil, “Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods,” Risk Analysis, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 553–578, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Phadke, Quality Engineering Using Robust Design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1989.
  11. D. M. Byrne and S. Taguchi, “The taguchi approach to parameter design,” in Proceedings of the 40th Quality Congress Transactions, vol. 40, pp. 168–177, Anaheim, Calif, USA, May 1986. View at Scopus
  12. R. N. Kackar, “Off-line quality control, parameter design, and the Taguchi approach,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 4, pp. 17–24, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  13. G. Box, “Signal-to-noise ratios, performance criteria, and transformations,” Technometrics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. J. Ross, Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1988.
  15. K. Al-Widyan and J. Angeles, “A model-based formulation of robust design,” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 388–396, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. Wu and A. Wu, Taguchi Methods for Robust Design, ASME, New York, NY, USA, 2000.