Table of Contents
Journal of Quality and Reliability Engineering
Volume 2013, Article ID 945039, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/945039
Research Article

Differential Importance Measure for Components Subjected to Aging Phenomena

1NIER Ingegneria, Via Altabella 3, 40127 Bologna, Italy
2DIENCA, University of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy

Received 27 April 2013; Revised 2 August 2013; Accepted 19 August 2013

Academic Editor: Benoit Iung

Copyright © 2013 Stefano La Rovere et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. Zio and L. Podofillini, “Accounting for components interactions in the differential importance measure,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 91, no. 10-11, pp. 1163–1174, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. C. Cheock, G. W. Parry, and R. R. Sherry, “Use of importance measures in risk-informed regulatory applications,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 60, pp. 213–226, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  3. E. Borgonovo, “The reliability importance of components and prime implicants in coherent and non-coherent systems including total-order interactions,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 204, no. 3, pp. 485–495, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. W. Birnbaum, “On the importance of different elements in a multi-elements system,” in Multivariate Analysis, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  5. X. R. Cao and H. F. Chen, “Pertubation realization, potentials, and sensitivity analysis of Markov processes,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1382–1393, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Marseguerra and E. Zio, “Optimizing maintenance and repair policies via a combination of genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 69–83, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. E. Borgonovo, M. Marseguerra, and E. Zio, “A Monte Carlo methodological approach to plant availability modeling with maintenance, aging and obsolescence,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 61–73, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Marseguerra and E. Zio, “Monte Carlo estimation of the differential importance measure: application to the protection system of a nuclear reactor,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 11–24, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Borgonovo and G. E. Apostolakis, “A new importance measure for risk-informed decision making,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 193–212, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. IAEA Safety Standards, Specific Safety Guide No. SSG-3, Development and Application of Level 1 Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants, 2010.
  11. P. Do Van, A. Barros, and C. Berenguer, “Reliability importance analysis of markovian systems at steady state using perturbation analysis,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 93, no. 11, pp. 1605–1615, 2008. View at Google Scholar