Research Article
Simulation-Based Fuzzy Logic Approach to Assessing the Effect of Project Quality Management on Construction Performance
Table 3
Linguistic terms and domains for the assessment of variables in the model.
| Variables | Domain | Domain range | Linguistic terms for assessment of variables |
| Performance level of PQM practices | Quality index | 0–100% | No formal approach | Reactive approach | Stable-formal system | Continual improvement emphasized | Best-in-class performance |
| Number of nonconformance events | Fuzzy | NA | Very low | Low | Average | High | Very high |
| Quality level of the project requirements () | Fuzzy | NA | Very poor | Poor | Average | Good | Very good |
| Frequency level of occurrence of the quality level () | Psychometric | 0–10 | Very unusual | Unusual | Often | Usual | Very usual |
| Adverse consequence resulting of the quality level () | Psychometric | 0–10 | Very mild | Mild | Medium | Severe | Very severe |
| Number of disruptions in a given construction activity () | Number of disruptions | 0–+∞ | Very small | Small | Medium | Large | Very large |
| Duration of delays due to disruptions () | Duration of delay (hours) | 0–+∞ | Very small | Small | Medium | Large | Very large |
|
|