Table of Contents
Journal of Quality and Reliability Engineering
Volume 2014, Article ID 264920, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/264920
Research Article

An Integrated Procedure for Bayesian Reliability Inference Using MCMC

1Division of Operation and Maintenance Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 97187 Luleå, Sweden
2Luleå Railway Research Centre (JVTC), 97187 Luleå, Sweden

Received 5 August 2013; Revised 27 November 2013; Accepted 28 November 2013; Published 14 January 2014

Academic Editor: Luigi Portinale

Copyright © 2014 Jing Lin. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. L. Kelly and C. L. Smith, “Bayesian inference in probabilistic risk assessment—the current state of the art,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 628–643, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. Congdon, Bayesian Statistical Modeling, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2001.
  3. P. Congdon, Applied Bayesian Modeling, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2003.
  4. D. G. Robinson, “A hierarchical bayes approach to system reliability analysis,” Tech. Rep. Sandia 2001-3513, Sandia National Laboratories, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  5. V. E. Johnson, “A hierarchical model for estimating the reliability of complex systems,” in Bayesian Statistics 7, J. M. Bernardo, Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. G. Wilson, “Hierarchical Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) for bayesian system reliability,” Encyclopedia of Statistics in Quality and Reliability, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Lin, M. Asplund, and A. Parida, “Bayesian parametric analysis for reliability study of locomotive wheels,” in Proceedings of the 59th Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS '13), Orlando, Fla, USA, 2013.
  8. G. Tonţ, L. Vlǎdǎreanu, M. S. Munteanu, and D. G. Tonţ, “Hierarchical Bayesian reliability analysis of complex dynamical systems,” in Proceedings of the 9th WSEAS International Conference on Applications of Electrical Engineering (AEE '10), pp. 181–186, March 2010. View at Scopus
  9. J. Lin, “A two-stage failure model for Bayesian change point analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 388–393, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Lin, M. L. Nordenvaad, and H. Zhu, “Bayesian survival analysis in reliability for complex system with a cure fraction,” International Journal of Performability Engineering, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 109–120, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Hamada, H. F. Martz, C. S. Reese, T. Graves, V. Johnson, and A. G. Wilson, “A fully Bayesian approach for combining multilevel failure information in fault tree quantification and optimal follow-on resource allocation,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 297–305, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. L. Graves, M. S. Hamada, R. Klamann, A. Koehler, and H. F. Martz, “A fully Bayesian approach for combining multi-level information in multi-state fault tree quantification,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 1476–1483, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. Kuo and B. Mallick, “Bayesian semiparametric inference for the accelerated failure-time model,” The Canadian Journal of Statistics, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 457–472, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Walker and B. K. Mallick, “A Bayesian semiparametric accelerated failure time model,” Biometrics, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 477–483, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. Hanson and W. O. Johnson, “A Bayesian semiparametric AFT model for interval-censored data,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 341–361, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. K. Ghosh and S. Ghosal, “Semiparametric accelerated failure time models for censored data,” in Bayesian Statistics and Its Applications, S. K. Upadhyay, Ed., Anamaya Publishers, New Delhi, India, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  17. A. Komárek and E. Lesaffre, “The regression analysis of correlated interval-censored data: illustration using accelerated failure time models with flexible distributional assumptions,” Statistical Modelling, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 299–319, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. Y. Li, Q. G. Wu, and Y. H. Zhao, “On bayesian analysis of binomial reliability growth,” The Japan Statistical Society, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  19. J. Y. Tao, Z. M. Ming, and X. Chen, “The bayesian reliability growth models based on a new dirichlet prior distribution,” in Reliability, Risk and Safety, C. G. Soares, Ed., Chapter 237, CRC Press, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  20. L. Kuo and T. Y. Yang, “Bayesian reliability modeling for masked system lifetime data,” Statistics and Probability Letters, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 229–241, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. Ilkka, “Methods and problems of software reliability estimation,” Tech. Rep. VTT Working Papers 1459-7683, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  22. Y. Tamura, H. Takehara, and S. Yamada, “Component-oriented reliability analysis based on hierarchical bayesian model for an open source software,” American Journal of Operations Research, vol. 1, pp. 25–32, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  23. G. I. Schuëller and H. J. Pradlwarter, “Benchmark study on reliability estimation in higher dimensions of structural systems—an overview,” Structural Safety, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 167–182, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. K. Au, J. Ching, and J. L. Beck, “Application of subset simulation methods to reliability benchmark problems,” Structural Safety, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 183–193, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. Li, Bayes reliability studies for complex system [Doctor thesis], National University of Defense Technology, 1999, Chinese.
  26. A. M. Walker, “On the asymptotic behavior of posterior distributions,” Journal of Royal Statistics Society B, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 80–88, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  27. S. Ghosal, “A review of consistency and convergence of posterior distribution. Technical report,” in Proceedings of National Conference in Bayesian Analysis, Benaras Hindu University, Varanashi, India, 2000.
  28. T. Choi, R. V. B. C. Ramamoorthi, and S. Ghosal, Eds., Pushing the Limits of Contemporary Statistics: Contributions in Honor of Jayanta K. Ghosh, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Beachwood, Ohio, USA, 2008.
  29. V. P. Savchuk and H. F. Martz, “Bayes reliability estimation using multiple sources of prior information: binomial sampling,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 138–144, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. K. J. Ren, M. D. Wu, and Q. Liu, “The combination of prior distributions based on kullback information,” Journal of the Academy of Equipment of Command & Technology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 90–92, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  31. Q. Liu, J. Feng, and J.-L. Zhou, “Application of similar system reliability information to complex system Bayesian reliability evaluation,” Journal of Aerospace Power, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 7–10, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Q. Liu, J. Feng, and J. Zhou, “The fusion method for prior distribution based on expert's information,” Chinese Space Science and Technology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 68–71, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. G. H. Fang, Research on the multi-source information fusion techniques in the process of reliability assessment [Doctor thesis], Hefei University of Technology, China, 2006.
  34. Z. B. Zhou, H. T. Li, X. M. Liu, G. Jin, and J. L. Zhou, “A bayes information fusion approach for reliability modeling and assessment of spaceflight long life product,” Journal of Systems Engineering, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 2517–2522, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  35. R. Howard and S. Robert, Applied Statistical Decision Theory, Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1961.
  36. J. Lin, M. Asplund, and A. Parida, “Reliability analysis for degradation of locomotive wheels using parametric bayesian approach,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. J. Lin and M. Asplund, “Bayesian semi-parametric analysis for locomotive wheel degradation using gamma frailties,” Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. J. G. Ibrahim, M. H. Chen, and D. Sinha, Bayesian Survival Analysis, 2001.
  39. J. Lin, Y.-Q. Han, and H.-M. Zhu, “A semi-parametric proportional hazards regression model based on gamma process priors and its application in reliability,” Chinese Journal of System Simulation, vol. 22, pp. 5099–5102, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  40. S. K. Sahu, D. K. Dey, H. Aslanidou, and D. Sinha, “A weibull regression model with gamma frailties for multivariate survival data,” Lifetime Data Analysis, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 123–137, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. H. Aslanidou, D. K. Dey, and D. Sinha, “Bayesian analysis of multivariate survival data using Monte Carlo methods,” Canadian Journal of Statistics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 33–48, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, “Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1087–1092, 1953. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. W. K. Hastings, “Monte carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications,” Biometrika, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 97–109, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. L. Tierney, “Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1701–1762, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  45. S. Chib and E. Greenberg, “Understanding the metropolis-hastings algorithm,” Journal of American Statistician, vol. 49, pp. 327–335, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  46. U. Grenander, Tutorial in Pattern Theory, Division of Applied Mathematics, Brow University, Providence, RI, USA, 1983.
  47. S. Geman and D. Geman, “Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 721–741, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. A. E. Gelfand and A. F. M. Smith, “Sampling-based approaches to calculation marginal densities,” Journal of American Asscioation, vol. 85, pp. 398–409, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  49. M. A. Tanner and W. H. Wong, “The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation (with discussion),” Journal of American Statistical Association, vol. 82, pp. 805–811, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  50. N. G. Polson, “Convergence of markov chain conte carlo algorithms,” in Bayesian Statistics 5, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  51. G. O. Roberts and J. S. Rosenthal, “Markov-chain Monte Carlo: some practical implications of theoretical results,” Canadian Journal of Statistics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 4–31, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. K. L. Mengersen and R. L. Tweedie, “Rates of convergence of the Hastings and Metropolis algorithms,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 101–121, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. A. Gelman and D. B. Rubin, “Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences (with discussion),” Statistical Science, vol. 7, pp. 457–511, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  54. A. E. Raftery and S. Lewis, “How many iterations in the gibbs sampler,” in Bayesian Statistics 4, pp. 763–773, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  55. S. T. Garren and R. L. Smith, Convergence Diagnostics for Markov Chain Samplers, Department of Statistics, University of North Carolina, 1993.
  56. G. O. Roberts and J. S. Rosenthal, “Markov-chain Monte Carlo: some practical implications of theoretical results,” Canadian Journal of Statistics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 5–31, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. S. P. Brooks and A. Gelman, “General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 434–455, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. J. Geweke, “Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments,” in Bayesian Statistics 4, J. M. Bernardo, J. Berger, A. P. Dawid, and A. F. M. Smith, Eds., pp. 169–193, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  59. V. E. Johnson, “Studying convergence of markov chain monte carlo algorithms using coupled sampling paths,” Tech. Rep., Institute for Statistics and Decision Sciences, Duke University, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  60. P. Mykland, L. Tierney, and B. Yu, “Regeneration in markov chain samplers,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, no. 90, pp. 233–241, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  61. C. Ritter and M. A. Tanner, “Facilitating the gibbs sampler: the gibbs stopper and the griddy gibbs sampler,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 87, pp. 861–868, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  62. G. O. Roberts, “Convergence diagnostics of the gibbs sampler,” in Bayesian Statistics 4, pp. 775–782, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  63. B. Yu, Monitoring the Convergence of Markov Samplers Based on Estimated L1 Error, Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 1994.
  64. B. Yu and P. Mykland, Looking at Markov Samplers through Cusum Path Plots: A Simple Diagnostic Idea, Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 1994.
  65. A. Zellner and C. K. Min, “Gibbs sampler convergence criteria,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 90, pp. 921–927, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  66. P. Heidelberger and P. D. Welch, “Simulation run length control in the presence of an initial transient,” Operations Research, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1109–1144, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. C. Liu, J. Liu, and D. B. Rubin, “A variational control variable for assessing the convergence of the gibbs sampler,” in Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Statistical Computing Section, pp. 74–78, 1992.
  68. J. F. Lawless, Statistical Models and Method for Lifetime Data, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1982.
  69. A. Gelman, J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, and D. B. Rubin, Bayesian Data Analysis, Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
  70. R. A. Kass and A. E. Raftery, “Bayes factor,” Journal of American Stattistical Association, vol. 90, pp. 773–795, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  71. A. Gelfand and D. Dey, “Bayesian model choice: asymptotic and exact calculations,” Journal of Royal Statistical Society B, vol. 56, pp. 501–514, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  72. C. T. Volinsky and A. E. Raftery, “Bayesian information criterion for censored survival models,” Biometrics, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 256–262, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. R. E. Kass and L. Wasserman, “A reference bayesian test for nested hypotheses and its relationship to the schwarz criterion,” Journal of American Statistical Association, vol. 90, pp. 928–934, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  74. D. J. Spiegelhalter, N. G. Best, B. P. Carlin, and A. van der Linde, “Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 583–639, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. S. Geisser and W. Eddy, “A predictive approach to model selection,” Journal of American Statistical Association, vol. 74, pp. 153–160, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  76. A. E. Gelfand, D. K. Dey, and H. Chang, “Model determinating using predictive distributions with implementation via sampling-based methods (with discussion),” in Bayesian Statistics 4, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  77. M. Newton and A. Raftery, “Approximate bayesian inference by the weighted likelihood bootstrap,” Journal of Royal Statistical Society B, vol. 56, pp. 1–48, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  78. P. J. Lenk and W. S. Desarbo, “Bayesian inference for finite mixtures of generalized linear models with random effects,” Psychometrika, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 93–119, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. X.-L. Meng and W. H. Wong, “Simulating ratios of normalizing constants via a simple identity: a theoretical exploration,” Statistica Sinica, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 831–860, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. S. Chib, “Marginal likelihood from the Gibbs output,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 90, pp. 1313–1321, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  81. S. Chib and I. Jeliazkov, “Marginal likelihood from the metropolis-hastings output,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 96, no. 453, pp. 270–281, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. S. M. Lewis and A. E. Raftery, “Estimating Bayes factors via posterior simulation with the Laplace-Metropolis estimator,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 92, no. 438, pp. 648–655, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. S. K. Sahu and R. C. H. Cheng, “A fast distance-based approach for determining the number of components in mixtures,” Canadian Journal of Statistics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 3–22, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. K. Mengersen and C. P. Robert, “Testing for mixtures: a bayesian entropic approach,” in Bayesian Statistics 5, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  85. J. G. Ibrahim and P. W. Laud, “A predictive approach to the analysis of designed experiments,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 89, pp. 309–319, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  86. A. E. Gelfand and S. K. Ghosh, “Model choice: a minimum posterior predictive loss approach,” Biometrika, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. M.-H. Chen, D. K. Dey, and J. G. Ibrahim, “Bayesian criterion based model assessment for categorical data,” Biometrika, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 45–63, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. P. J. Green, “Reversible jump Markov chain monte carlo computation and Bayesian model determination,” Biometrika, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 711–732, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. C. Robert and G. Casella, Monte Carlo Statistical Methods, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
  90. M. Stephens, “Bayesian analysis of mixture models with an unknown number of components—an alternative to reversible jump methods,” Annals of Statistics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 40–74, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. M. Tatiana, F. S. Sylvia, and D. A. Georg, Comparison of Bayesian Model Selection Based on MCMC with an Application to GARCH-Type Models, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, 2003.
  92. P. C. Gregory, “Extra-solar planets via Bayesian fusion MCMC,” in Astrostatistical Challenges for the New Astronomy, J. M. Hilbe, Ed., Springer Series in Astrostatistics, Chapter 7, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  93. H. Chen and S. Huang, “A comparative study on model selection and multiple model fusion,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION '05), pp. 820–826, July 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. H. Jeffreys, Theory of Probability, Oxford Univiersity Press, Oxford, UK, 1961.
  95. G. Celeux, F. Forbes, C. P. Robert, and D. M. Titterington, “Deviance information criteria for missing data models,” Bayesian Analysis, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 651–674, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  96. H. Akaike, “Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory, Tsahkadsor, 1971.