Journal of Renewable Energy

Journal of Renewable Energy / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 545212 |

Naji Al Dahoudi, Qifeng Zhang, Guozhong Cao, "Low-Temperature Processing of Titanium Oxide Nanoparticles Photoanodes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells", Journal of Renewable Energy, vol. 2013, Article ID 545212, 8 pages, 2013.

Low-Temperature Processing of Titanium Oxide Nanoparticles Photoanodes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

Academic Editor: Onder Ozgener
Received05 Sep 2012
Revised20 Oct 2012
Accepted26 Oct 2012
Published29 Nov 2012


Using the low-temperature processing of different organofunctional silanes like TEOS, GPTS, and MPTS to incorporate within TiO2 network, dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) processed at low temperatures were obtained. The UV-cured MPTS-modified layer exhibited better performance over the TEOS and GPTS, where better mechanical stable layer is achieved in addition to better interconnection between the TiO2 nanoparticles. The J-V characteristics of the DSC composed of silane-based layer showed that the improved cell performance was due to the high photocurrent density accompanied with more dye adsorption and higher charge injection from TiO2 to FTO substrate resulting from the formation of an ohmic contact with the substrate. The highest conversion efficiency attained for MPTS-TiO2 layer cured with UV and followed by heating at 300C was %, which is 2.8 times better than the GPTS-based layer.

1. Introduction

The increasing global demands of clean energy is becoming one of the major scientific challenges for scientists, economists, and politicians [1], as the combustion of fossil foils has produced widespread environmental damage [2]. Therefore, the Sun as an abundant source of energy represents the ideal source of clean energy, which has a solar flux deposited on the surface of the earth within one hour as much as the global power usage. However, the high production cost compared with the fossil foils has retarded the widespread commercialization of this alternative energy. There have been intensive investigations for higher efficiency and cost effective conversion of solar radiation to electricity.

Silicon-based solar cell technologies are currently the widely used commercial photovoltaic technology; however, the nonsilicon photovoltaic thin films are a major competitor with less cost and more flexibility than traditional solar cells [3]. One of the most promising technologies is the dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs), which have attracted much attention as they offer the possibility of extremely inexpensive and efficient solar energy conversion with flexible routes of production. The maximum reported efficiency since the first report published by O’Regan and Grätzel in 1991 [4], is with a current record of ~11–13% [512]. DSC is a mimic of the photosynthesis and a physical separation between photon absorption and charge percolation process. The light is absorbed by a molecular dye, that is attached to the surface of semiconducting thick layer (10–15 μm) deposited on transparent conducting oxide (TCO) electrode. The excited dye rapidly injects an electron into the semiconducting photoanode, where it diffuses through the sintered particle network to be collected through the TCO electrode, while the dye is regenerated via reduction by a redox shuttle electrolyte. The oxidized electrolyte is diffused to a counter electrode to complete the circuit. The recombination of the injected electron with the oxidized dye before it is regenerated, or the redox shuttle, can intercept an electron from the photoanode before it is collected, causing a drop on the total performance of the conversion process.

The intensive investigations of many researchers have been concentrated on three main components of the cell: the photoanode, the dye, and the electrolyte and/or the interfaces between them [1214]. Conventional DSCs require to heat the photoanode at a temperature of 450°C or higher [15]. This annealing step is needed for ensuring good adherence of photoanode onto the substrate, eliminating the organic residues present in the paste or colloid, and improving the connection for efficient charge transport between the nanocrystallites that constitute the film. This step is difficult to be avoided and prevents the DSCs on flexible substrates that do not withstand high temperature annealing [16, 17]. Different reports have been published to avoid the high temperature annealing of the thick photoanode layer, for example, by not using organic compounds in the formulation of the paste [18] or by using alternative way of sintering the nanoparticles via utilizing high mechanical pressure or curing them by electron beams or UV irradiation [1921].

The inorganic-organic binders like Tetraethoxysilane (TEOS), 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (GPTS) or 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (MPTS), have also been used to enhance the electrical and mechanical properties of layers consisting of ITO nanoparticles [22, 23]. The so-called organofunctional silanes are hybrid compounds that can be used as “molecular bridges” between inorganic materials. The advantages of such monomers include the fact that they can be readily polymerized at relatively low temperature, which allows them to be used for nanocomposite coatings that processed at low temperatures.

Recently, we have developed a DSC of multiporous structure by the modification of the TiO2 nanoparticles using MPTS, where a significant enhancement of the total performance of the cell was obtained [24]. In this study, we applied different silica coupling agents to coat TiO2 nanoparticles to further lower the processing temperature as a photoelectrode. Such coupling agents are aimed to have a cross linkage between titania nanoparticles at relatively low processing temperatures (100–300°C). The microstructures, electrochemical properties, and the power conversion performance of the assembled DSCs composed of different silane networks, such as TEOS, GPTS, and MPTS, are compared and characterized.

2. Experimental Work

2.1. Photoelectrode Coating

Nanoparticles of TiO2 used in this work for preparing the coating paste were obtained by hydrothermally treating TiO2 sol, as previously reported [25]. Typically, 0.3 g of TiO2 powder is wetted and grinded by using 0.55 g of polyethylene Glycol solution (PEG400) in a mortar for 5 minutes. 0.05 g of 25 wt% ethanolic solution of Pluronic P123 and 0.1 g of 50 wt% ethanolic solution of hydrolyzed silane like TEOS, GPTS, and MPTS were added to the formed paste and further grinding for 5 minutes was applied to form a homogeneous viscous paste. The TiO2 paste was deposited onto FTO glass substrates using doctor blading technique to form a thick film. The obtained films were cured by UV irradiation using a 4 W UV Mineralight multiband lamp (UV 254/365 nm, UVGL-25) for 10 hours, and finally the layers are heated at 120, 200, and 300°C for 3 h in air.

2.2. Cell Assembly and Characterization

The films were all sensitized by immersing them in 0.5 mM ruthenium-based N3 dye solution for 24 h, then rinsed in ethanol and dried in air at RT. A Pt-coated silicon substrate was used as the counter electrode, and an iodide-based solution, consisting of 0.6 M tetrabutylammonium iodide, 0.1 M lithium iodide, 0.1 M iodine and 0.5 M 4-tert-butylpyridine in acetonitrile, was used as the liquid electrolyte. Photovoltaic properties of each solar cell were characterized using simulated AM 1.5 sunlight illumination with an output power of 100 mW/cm2. An Ultraviolet Solar Simulator (Model 16S, Solar Light Co., Philadelphia, PA) with a 200WXenon Lamp Power Supply (Model XPS 200, Solar Light Co., Philadelphia, PA) was used as the light source, and a Semiconductor Parameter Analyzer (4155A, Hewlett-Packard, Japan) was used to measure the current and voltage. The IV measurements were repeated three times and the average results were reported. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out through the Solartron 1287A coupling with the Solartron 1260 FRA/impedance analyzer to investigate electronic and ionic processes in DSCs.

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA 7, Perkin-Elmer) was used to investigate the thermal behavior of the UV cured paste as a function of the annealing temperature.

X-ray Diffraction (XRD, Philips PW 1830 Diffractometer) was used to verify the phase and particle size of the TiO2 nanoparticle films. The morphology of the photoanode surfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM-7000). The BET surface area and the pore size distribution of the layers were determined by using Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET, Quantachrome NOVA 4200e).

To measure the adsorbed N3 dye amount on the silane modified TiO2 films, the dye was desorbed by immersing dye-sensitized films in a 0.1 M NaOH solution in water and ethanol (1 : 1, v/v). An ultraviolet-visible-near infrared spectrophotometer (UV-VIS-NIR, Perkin Elmer Lambda 900) was employed to measure the dye concentration of the desorbed-dye solution.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. DSCs Performance

The photovoltaic properties of the DSCs composed of silica and titania network were investigated for different types of hydrolyzed alkoxysilanes, such as TEOS, GPTS, and MPTS. The titania-TEOS layers formed at low temperatures up to 300°C were not stable and easily removed from substrates after the dye sensitization. The titania-GPTS layers were stable when the samples heated at temperatures greater than 180°C, though the sample heated at 120°C was fragile after the dye sensitization. The titania-MPTS layers were stable for all samples, which indicates the better cross-link gained by using the MPTS due to siloxane-rich species especially after the UV polymerization that promote the condensation of the silanol groups [26]. Ukaji et al. [27] showed that the photo-catalytic activity and UV-shielding ability were influenced by the number of surface groups of silane-modified TiO2 nanoparticles, which change the surface character of the modified sample.

The JV curves of the cells composed of the photoelectrodes treated at different temperatures for MPTS- and GPTS-modified titania samples are shown in Figures 1(a) and 1(b) and Table 1. No data is shown for all TEOS-titania samples and the GPTS-titania sample which treated at 120°C, as part of the layer dissolved after the immersion of the dye solution. For the GPTS-modified sample (Figure 1(b)), it is exhibited that heating the photoanode layers from 200 to 300°C improved both the photocurrent density and the open circuit voltage with an increase of the efficiency from to . Also a minimal increase of the filling factor was observed. On the other hand, the MPTS-modified sample attained an efficiency of , which is obtained even for the sample tempered at low temperature (120°C). This means that MPTS may be considered as a suitable modifier for low-temperature processing, where silica network interconnects the titania nanoparticle forming an ohmic contact with the FTO substrate. Further improvement was obtained by further thermal treatment to 200°C and up to 300°C, which is referred to the better contact between the titania nanoparticles, in addition to the reduction of the existence of the organics species that affect the dye loading. The conversion efficiency of the DSCs was improved considerably from to by raising the heating temperature from 120 to 200°C. The main improvement of the efficiency was coming from the enhancement of the photocurrent density from to  mA/cm2, while a minimal change of the open circuit voltage was observed. Further step of improvements was obtained by raising the heating temperature of the MPTS-titania photoelectrode layer up to 300°C due to an increase of the open circuit voltage by 37 mV and a photocurrent density of  mA/cm2 with an overall conversion efficiency of . This value is 64% greater than the efficiency of the bare titania nanoparticles heated at the same temperature [28]. Nguyen et al. [29] have reported that the enhanced performance of TiO2/SiO2 electrode over bare TiO2 one was ascribed to the role of SiO2 as an energy barrier, increasing the physical separation of injected electrons and oxidized dyes/redox couple, and thereby retarding the recombination reactions in the resulting DSC.

(mA/cm2) (< ±0.01 Volt) (%)F.F. (< ±0.01)

120°C2.45 ± 0.110.6921.17 ± 0.040.65
200°C6.35 ± 0.132.36 ± 0.080.7030.712.86 ± 0.050.93 ± 0.030.620.55
300°C7.41 ± 0.143.21 ± 0.150.740.743.75 ± 0.071.34 ± 0.060.660.56

The superior performance results of MPTS over the TEOS- and GPTS-based layers might be referred to the fact that MPTS is a UV curable monomer much likely than GPTS and TEOS. From previous studies of using such monomers to interconnect tin-doped indium oxide (ITO) nanoparticles, it was found that MPTS allows the best cross linking of the conducting ITO nanoparticles under UV curing process [22]. The obtained sheet resistance of MPTS-ITO system was 8 KΩ, where those of GPTS- and TEOS-based system were 18 and 63 KΩ, respectively. The degree of polymerization as well as the cross linking of MPTS is enhanced by utilizing the UV irradiation as a result of the radical polymerization of the methacrylic moieties [30]. The thermal curing alone is not effective for the polymerization and the condensation process of the coatings. On the opposite, the UV treatment eliminates the C=C band, strongly reduces the C=O band, and forms a well-defined Si–O–Si network linking homogeneously the particles together. The epoxy group in the GPTS could react with water to form glycol, which may terminate the polymerization of the monomer [31].

The main characteristic of the enhancement of the conversion efficiency of MPTS-titania layer is attributed to the improvements of the photocurrent density, which is mainly referred to the difference of the dye adsorption as shown in Figure 3. The removal of the organic species from the films allowed more dye to penetrate the bulk of the thick film, where the texture of the heated films was changed accordingly. The TGA results shown in Figure 2 exhibited a significant weight loss for UV-treated MPTS-TiO2 sample compared with that of GPTS-TiO2 system. Larger surface area and pore size have a strong influence on the dye adsorption. It is thought that the silica network interconnected the TiO2 nanoparticles, which enhances the electron path within the photoanode layer. It is noticeable that the outperformance of the hydrolyzed MPTS over the other silica coupling agents may refer to its capability of long chain polymerization after the UV treatment, which allows direct pathway for the electron transport.

3.2. Thermal Analysis

The TGA curve shown in Figure 2 belongs to the GPTS- and MPTS-based Titania paste after 10 h UV curing and drying overnight at 80°C. The curve of the GPTS-titania sample showed a slower weight loss compared with MPTS-titania sample. The sample exhibited three distinct steps. The first stage is due to the removal of the physically adsorbed water up to 100°C. The second stage is up to 250°C, which is attributed to the release of the surfactant and the polyethylene glycol. The third stage is between 250 and 350°C, which is due to the condensation of the silica network. The degradation of the organic species in the paste of MPTS-titania exhibited a continuous weight loss of 4.5%, 21%, and 55% at the working temperatures 120, 200, and 300°C. Contrary to the GPTS-titania paste, no significant weight loss for the MPTS-titania sample was observed at temperature higher than 300°C, which means that most of the hydrogel network can be removed at relatively low processing temperature. The UV irradiation of the TiO2 paste may be resulted in a degradation of the organic groups, where it is common to use titanium oxide as a mean to degrade the organic wastes [32, 33].

3.3. Dye Loading

The amount of the dye loaded on the heat-treated MPTS-titania photoelectrode films were determined using UV-Vis spectroscopy. The dye N719 was first detached from the layers using 5 mL 0.1 mM KOH solution. Figure 3 shows that the sample absorption of the detached dye increases by increasing the heat treatment temperature. Based on the experimental data shown in the UV-Vis absorption spectra, the amounts of dye loaded on each layer is estimated to be , , and  mol/cm2 for the samples treated at 120, 200, and 300°C, respectively. The amount of the dye loaded for the GPTS-titania sample heated at 300°C was  mol/cm2. The amount of the dye loaded on the layers is an indication that the porous structure obviously improved the absorption of dye because of its large surface areas as shown in Table 2. The significant improvement in dye loading could result in a better light harvesting and a higher photocurrent conversion efficiency of the device, which is obvious from the results in Table 1.

SampleSurface area (m2/g)Pore volume (cc/g)Pore size (nm)


3.4. BET Surface Area

The heat treatment temperature strongly influences the texture properties of the MPTS-TiO2 electrodes, which were investigated by N2 adsorption measurements. The resulting adsorption and desorption isotherms for the different heat-treated MPTS-based samples exhibited a hysteresis loop with type IV isotherms with a sharp capillary condensation step at high relative pressures as shown in Figure 4. The surface area, pore volume, and average pore diameter were calculated by the BET method and the results are given in Table 2. An increase of the BET surface area from 32.6 to 56 and then to 70 m2/g was observed when the heating temperature was raised from 120 to 200 and then to 300°C, respectively. A relative increase of the pore size was calculated (Table 2) corresponding to the increase of the heating temperature, which indicates a removal of organic species of the binder. The increase of the surface area and the pore size might well explain the increased amount of dye loaded as revealed in Figure 3.

3.5. Structural Properties
3.5.1. XRD

The diffraction patterns of the MPTS-TiO2 nanoparticulate layers deposited on FTO glass substrate, UV cured in addition heating at 120, 200, and 300°C are shown in Figure 5. All peaks correspond to Anatase phase, like the original nanopowder [25]. No existence for other phases were detected, and almost no change in the crystallite size was observed at the different heating temperature.

3.6. Surface Morphology

The SEM surface morphologies with different magnification of the prepared MPTS-TiO2 electrodes heated at 120, 200, and 300°C are shown in Figures 6(a), 6(b), and 6(c), respectively. As shown in Figure 6(a), the sample treated at 120°C showed homogeneous surface with obvious loosely packed aggregates dispersed in organic matrix. The 200 and 300°C treated samples showed sharper morphology and closely packed aggregates were formed; however, a closer inspection revealed that the TiO2 film treated at higher temperature had indeed multiporous structure made up of nanocrystalline titanium dioxide particles. The 300°C treated sample showed larger porous structure. These multiporous structures resulted from the decomposition of organic binder, which could be expected to have a larger surface area and more convenient dye loading as well as more electrolyte transportation.

3.7. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy

The impedance data measured at the open-circuit voltage under dark condition with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was utilized to determine the charge-transfer resistance between the transparent-conducting oxide (FTO) and the TiO2 porous layer and the interface between TiO2/dye/electrolyte, as shown in Figure 7. The measured frequency range was from 0.1 Hz to 100 kHz. Usually, the impedance plot of a DSC exhibits two semicircles or arcs in the Nyquist diagram [34, 35]. The first semicircle in the high-frequency region is attributed to the impedance of the charge transfer process at the counter electrode. The second semicircle in the middle-frequency region is related to the charge-transfer process at the TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface as well as the resistance to the transport of electrons to the working electrode. The impedance data is interpreted using equivalent electrical circuit elements as shown in the inset of Figure 7. In this study, the charge transfer resistance increased from  Ω to  Ω when the annealing temperature increased from 120°C to 200°C and a reduction to  Ω by further increase to 300°C. This reveals that the low-temperature sample suffered from a high charge combination rate due to the existence of some organic residues that were present in the photoanode. This may be due to the decrease in pore size of the TiO2 film and thus decreasing the dye adsorption as well as penetration of redox couples into the pores of TiO2 electrode. Correspondingly, the characteristic frequency peaks shifted to lower frequency when the heating temperature increased to 200°C and then shifted slightly back again to higher frequency when the heating temperature was raised to 300°C. The characteristic frequency is related to the inverse of the recombination lifetime or electron lifetime in the TiO2 film [36]. The increase of the recombination rate of the 300°C sample might be attributed to more and easy electrolyte penetration due to high mesoporous surface area, large porosity, and large pores, which makes the recombination centers closer to the TiO2 surfaces. The Ohmic serial resistance corresponds to the overall series resistance decreased gradually by raising the heating temperature from 120 to 300°C. Such decrease is expected due to better interconnection between the TiO2 nanoparticles, which results in the improvement of the electron path and consequently higher photocurrent density will be observed.

4. Conclusions

Among three silane coupling agents investigated, MPTS shows a great promise for low-temperature processing of TiO2 photoanodes for DSCs. The J-V characteristics of the DSC composed of MPTS-based layer showed that the improved cell performance was due to the high photocurrent density facilitated with more dye adsorption and higher charge injection from TiO2 to FTO substrate resulting from the formation of an Ohmic contact with the substrate. The conversion efficiency attained for MPTS-TiO2 layer cured with UV and followed by heating at 200°C was , where further heating at 300°C raised the power conversion efficiency to .


N. Al Dahoudi would like to acknowledge the Council for International Exchange of Scholars (CIES) for their Fulbright Scholarship. Also, this work has been supported in part by the US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials and Engineering under Award no. DE-FG02-07ER46467 (Q.F.Z.) on the microstructure characterization and some power conversion efficiency measurements, National Science Foundation (DMR-1035196), Boeing-Steiner Endowment, University of Washington TGIF, grant, and Intel Corporation.


  1. G. W. Crabtree and N. S. Lewis, “Solar energy conversion,” Physics Today, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 37–42, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. R. A. Kerr, “How urgent is climate change?” Science, vol. 318, no. 5854, pp. 1230–1231, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. R. D. McConnell, “Assessment of the dye-sensitized solar cell,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 273–295, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  4. B. O'Regan and M. Grätzel, “A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films,” Nature, vol. 353, no. 6346, pp. 737–740, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  5. Y. Chiba, A. Islam, Y. Watanabe, R. Komiya, N. Koide, and L. Han, “Dye-sensitized solar cells with conversion efficiency of 11.1%,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 45, no. 24–28, pp. L638–L640, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. K. Nazeeruddin, F. De Angelis, S. Fantacci et al., “Combined experimental and DFT-TDDFT computational study of photoelectrochemical cell ruthenium sensitizers,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 48, pp. 16835–16847, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Grätzel, “Solar energy conversion by dye-sensitized photovoltaic cells,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 20, pp. 6841–6851, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Grätzel, “Dye-sensitized solid-state heterojunction solar cells,” MRS Bulletin, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 23–27, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  9. Y. Chiba, A. Islam, R. Komiya, N. Koide, and L. Han, “Conversion efficiency of 10.8% by a dye-sensitized solar cell using a TiO2 electrode with high haze,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 88, no. 22, Article ID 223505, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Z. S. Wang, M. Yanagida, K. Sayama, and H. Sugihara, “Electronic-insulating coating of CaCO3 on TiO2 electrode in dye-sensitized solar cells: improvement of electron lifetime and efficiency,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 2912–2916, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. K. Nazeeruddin, E. Baranoff, and M. Grätzel, “Dye-sensitized solar cells: a brief overview,” Solar Energy, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1172–1178, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Yella, H. W. Lee, H. N. Tsao et al., “Porphyrin-sensitized solar cells with cobalt (II/III)-based redox electrolyte exceed 12 percent efficiency,” Science, vol. 334, no. 6056, pp. 629–634, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  13. S.-H. Fan, A.-G. Zhang, C. C. Ju, and K.-Z. Wang, “A phenylcarbazole functionalized ruthenium dye for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells,” Solar Energy, vol. 85, no. 10, pp. 2497–2506, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. L. Guo, X. Pan, C. Zhang et al., “Ionic liquid electrolyte based on S-propyltetrahydrothiophenium iodide for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Solar Energy, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 373–378, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. D. Zhao, T. Peng, L. Lu, P. Cai, P. Jiang, and Z. Bian, “Effect of annealing temperature on the photoelectrochemical properties of dye-sensitized solar cells made with mesoporous TiO2 nanoparticles,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 22, pp. 8486–8494, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. B. Wang and L. L. Kerr, “Dye sensitized solar cells on paper substrates,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 2531–2535, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S.-S. Kim, J. H. Yum, and Y. E. Sung, “Flexible dye-sensitized solar cells using ZnO coated TiO2 nanoparticles,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 171, no. 3, pp. 269–273, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. F. Pichot, J. R. Pitts, and B. A. Gregg, “Low-temperature sintering of TiO2 colloids: application to flexible dye-sensitized solar cells,” Langmuir, vol. 16, no. 13, pp. 5626–5630, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. T. Kado, M. Yamaguchi, Y. Yamada, and S. Hayase, “Low temperature preparation of nano-porous TiO2 layers for plastic dye sensitized solar cells,” Chemistry Letters, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1056–1057, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. D. Gutiérrez-Tauste, I. Zumeta, E. Vigil, M. A. Hernández-Fenollosa, X. Domènech, and J. A. Ayllón, “New low-temperature preparation method of the TiO2 porous photoelectrode for dye-sensitized solar cells using UV irradiation,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 175, no. 2-3, pp. 165–171, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. T. N. Murakami, Y. Kijitori, N. Kawashima, and T. Miyasaka, “Low temperature preparation of mesoporous TiO2 films for efficient dye-sensitized photoelectrode by chemical vapor deposition combined with UV light irradiation,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 164, no. 1–3, pp. 187–191, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. N. Al Dahoudi, Wet chemical deposition of transparent conducting coatings made of redispersable crystalline ITO nanoparticles on glass and polymeric substrates [Ph.D. thesis], University of Saarland, Saarbrucken, Germany, 2003.
  23. I. Maksimenko, M. Gross, T. Königer, H. Münstedt, and P. J. Wellmann, “Conductivity and adhesion enhancement in low-temperature processed indium tin oxide/polymer nanocomposites,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 518, no. 10, pp. 2910–2915, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. N. Al Dahoudi, J. Xi, and G. Cao, “Silica modification of titania nanoparticles for dye-sensitized solar cell,” Electrochemica Acta, vol. 59, pp. 32–38, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. T. P. Chou, Q. Zhang, B. Russo, G. E. Fryxell, and G. Cao, “Titania particle size effect on the overall performance of dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 111, no. 17, pp. 6296–6302, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. Sepeur, N. Kunze, B. Werner, and H. Schmidt, “UV curable hard coatings on plastics,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 351, no. 1-2, pp. 216–219, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  27. E. Ukaji, T. Furusawa, M. Sato, and N. Suzuki, “The effect of surface modification with silane coupling agent on suppressing the photo-catalytic activity of fine TiO2 particles as inorganic UV filter,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 254, no. 2, pp. 563–569, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Xi, N. Al Dahoudi, Q. Zhang, Y. Sun, and G. Cao, “Effect of annealing temperature on the performances and electrochemical properties of TiO2 dye-sensitized solar cells,” Science of Advanced Materials, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 727–733, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. T. V. Nguyen, H. C. Lee, M. Alam Khan, and O. B. Yang, “Electrodeposition of TiO2/SiO2 nanocomposite for dye-sensitized solar cell,” Solar Energy, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 529–534, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Q. A. Acton, Alloys: Advances in Research and Applications, Scholarly Edition, Atlanta, Ga, USA, 2011.
  31. G. Philipp and H. Schmidt, “The reactivity of TiO2 and ZrO2 in organically modified silicates,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 82, no. 1–3, pp. 31–36, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  32. N. Serpone and E. Pelizzetti, Photocatalysis: Fundamentals and Applications, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1989.
  33. M. R. Hoffmann, S. T. Martin, W. Choi, and D. W. Bahnemann, “Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 69–96, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  34. J. Van De Lagemaat, N. G. Park, and A. J. Frank, “Influence of electrical potential distribution, charge transport, and recombination on the photopotential and photocurrent conversion efficiency of dye-sensitized nanocrystalline TiO2 solar cells: a study by electrical impedance and optical modulation techniques,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 104, no. 9, pp. 2044–2052, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  35. Q. Wang, J. E. Moser, and M. Grätzel, “Electrochemical impedance spectroscopic analysis of dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 31, pp. 14945–14953, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. G. Schlichthörl, S. Y. Huang, J. Sprague, and A. J. Frank, “Band edge movement and recombination kinetics in dye-sensitized nanocrystalline TiO2 solar cells: a study by intensity modulated photovoltage spectroscopy,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 101, no. 41, pp. 8141–8155, 1997. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Naji Al Dahoudi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.