Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Renewable Energy
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 8727164, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8727164
Research Article

A Comparison of Fishes and Invertebrates Living in the Vicinity of Energized and Unenergized Submarine Power Cables and Natural Sea Floor off Southern California, USA

1Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
2Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, 760 Paseo Camarillo, Camarillo, CA 93010, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Milton S. Love

Received 3 April 2017; Accepted 22 August 2017; Published 2 October 2017

Academic Editor: Abhijeet P. Borole

Copyright © 2017 Milton S. Love et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. B. Gill, M. Bartlett, and F. Thomsen, “Potential interactions between diadromous fishes of U.K. conservation importance and the electromagnetic fields and subsea noise from marine renewable energy developments,” Journal of Fish Biology, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 664–695, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. J. Kalmijn, “Electric and magnetic field detection in elasmobranch fishes,” Science, vol. 218, no. 4575, pp. 916–918, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. Formicki, M. Sadowski, A. Tański, A. Korzelecka-Orkisz, and A. Winnicki, “Behaviour of trout (Salmo trutta L.) larvae and fry in a constant magnetic field,” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 290–294, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Tanski, K. Formicki, P. Smietana, M. Sadowski, and A. Winnicki, “Sheltering behaviour of spinycheek crayfish (Orconectes limosus) in the presence of an artificial magnetic field,” Bulletin Francais de la Peche et de la Pisciculture, vol. 376, pp. 787–793, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  5. R. Kavet, M. T. Wyman, and A. P. Klimley, “Assessment of potential impact of electromagnetic fields from undersea cable on migratory fish behavior,” Tech. Rep., BOEM Publication Number, OCS Study BOEM 2016-041, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  6. E. Normandeu, T. Tricas, and A. Gill, Effects of EMFs From Undersea Power Cables on Elasmobranchs and Other Marine Species, OCS Study BOEMRE 2011-09, United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement, Pacific OCS Region, Camarillo, CA, USA, 2011.
  7. E. S. Dunlop, S. M. Reid, and M. Murrant, “Limited influence of a wind power project submarine cable on a Laurentian Great Lakes fish community,” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 18–31, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. S. Love, M. M. Nishimoto, S. Clark, and A. S. Bull, “Renewable Energy in situ Power Cable Observations,” in OCS Study 2016-008, OCS Study 2016-008, United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Pacific OCS Region, Camarillo, CA, USA, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  9. PRIMER-E Ltd, “Plymouth routines in multivariate ecological research,” Version 6.1.13, 2009.
  10. K. R. Clarke and R. N. Gorley, “Primer v6: User manual/Tutorial,” Primer-E. Plymouth, UK, 2006.
  11. SAS Institute Inc., “JMP Pro 12.0.1,” 2015.
  12. N. R. Draper and H. Smith, Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models, Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 3rd edition, 2014.
  13. M. S. Love, M. M. Nishimoto, S. Clark, and A. S. Bull, “Identical response of caged rock crabs (genera Metacarcinus and Cancer) to energized and unenergized power cables in southern California, USA,” Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences, pp. 33–41, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. M. S. Love, J. Caselle, and L. Snook, “Fish assemblages on mussel mounds surrounding seven oil platforms in the Santa Barbara Channel and Santa Maria Basin,” Bulletin of Marine Science, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 497–513, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. S. Love and A. York, “A comparison of the fish assemblages associated with an oil/gas pipeline and adjacent seafloor in the Santa Barbara Channel, Southern California Bight,” Bulletin of Marine Science, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 101–117, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. J. Anderson and M. M. Yoklavich, “Multiscale habitat associations of deepwater demersal fishes off central California,” Fishery Bulletin, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 168–179, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. S. Love, M. Yoklavich, and D. M. Schroeder, “Demersal fish assemblages in the Southern California Bight based on visual surveys in deep water,” Environmental Biology of Fishes, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 55–68, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. S. Love, Certainly more than you want to know about the fishes of the pacific coast, Really Big Press, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 2012.
  19. J. H. R. Goddard and M. S. Love, “Megabenthic invertebrates on shell mounds associated with oil and gas platforms off California,” Bulletin of Marine Science, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 533–554, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Kuhnz, K. Buck, C. Lovera, P. J. Whaling, and J. P. Barry, Potential Impacts of the Monterey Accelerated Research System (MARS) Cable on the Seabed and Benthic Fauna Assemblages, MARS Biological Survey Report, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, 2015.
  21. C. Greathead, J. M. Gonzalez-Irusta, J. Clarke et al., “Environmental requirements for three sea pen species: Relevance to distribution and conservation,” ICES Journal of Marine Science, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 576–586, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. Westerberg and I. Lagenfelt, “Sub-sea power cables and the migration behaviour of the European eel,” Fisheries Management and Ecology, vol. 15, no. 5-6, pp. 369–375, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. B. Gill, Y. Huang, I. Gloyne-Phillips et al., COWRIE 2.0 Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) Phase 2: EMF-Sensitive Fish Response to EM Emissions from Sub-sea Electricity Cables of the Type Used by the Offshore Renewable Energy Industry, COWRIE Ltd. Cowrie-EMF-1-06, 2009.
  24. “DONG Energy and Vattenfall A/S. Review Report 2005. The Danish Offshore Wind Farm Demonstration Project: Horn Rev and Nysted Offshore Wind Farms. Environmental Impact Assessment and Monitoring, 2006”.
  25. I. Kogan, C. K. Paull, K. Kuhnz et al., Environmental Impact of the ATOC/Pioneer Seamount Submarine Cable, Bay Aquarium Research Institute, 2003.
  26. L. A. Kuhnz, J. P. Barry, K. Buck, C. Lovera, and P. J. Whaling, Potential Impacts of the Monterey Accelerated Research System (MARS) Cable on the Seabed and Benthic Fauna Assemblages, MARS Biological Survey Report, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, 2011.