Journal of Signal Transduction

Journal of Signal Transduction / 2012 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 619747 | 11 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/619747

The Role of HCN Channels on Membrane Excitability in the Nervous System

Academic Editor: Junichi Nakai
Received20 Apr 2012
Accepted19 Jun 2012
Published13 Aug 2012

Abstract

Hyperpolarization-activated and cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels were first reported in heart cells and are recently known to be involved in a variety of neural functions in healthy and diseased brains. HCN channels generate inward currents when the membrane potential is hyperpolarized. Voltage dependence of HCN channels is regulated by intracellular signaling cascades, which contain cyclic AMP, PIP2, and TRIP8b. In addition, voltage-gated potassium channels have a strong influence on HCN channel activity. Because of these funny features, HCN channel currents, previously called funny currents, can have a wide range of functions that are determined by a delicate balance of modulatory factors. These multifaceted features also make it difficult to predict and elucidate the functional role of HCN channels in actual neurons. In this paper, we focus on the impacts of HCN channels on neural activity. The functions of HCN channels reported previously will be summarized, and their mechanisms will be explained by using numerical simulation of simplified model neurons.

1. Introduction

Hyperpolarization-activated and cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels, first identified in 1976 in the heart by Noma and Irisawa [1] and characterized by Brown and Difrancesco [2] and Weiss and his colleague [3], are cation channels that open when the membrane potential is hyperpolarized. The general structure of HCN channels resembles that of the voltage-gated K+ channels. HCN channels consist of four subunits that have six transmembrane segments [4], the canonical GYG sequence in the pore forming region, and the positively charged S4 segment [4, 5]. But the K+ permeability of HCN channels is not so selective as typical K+ channels and is permeable to Na+ [6]. Thus a typical current reversal potential of HCN channels is around −30 mV. For voltage-dependent gating, inward movement of S4 segment in response to hyperpolarization is reported [79], but molecular aspects of channel opening are still unknown. For example, HCN channels require extracellular Cl and extracellular K+ to open [4]. Cyclic-AMP-(cAMP-) binding site locates near the C terminus, and cAMP affects the voltage dependence of activation in some HCN channel isoforms [10]. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) is also known as a modulator of HCN channels; it shifts the voltage dependence through a different mechanism from that of cAMP [11, 12]. These multifaceted features endow HCN channels to work in many functions described below. In this paper, we try to understand the physiological significance of these functions by using simple numerical simulations.

2. Expression Pattern

Previous literatures reported that HCN channels are expressed in heart [1], brain [14], taste buds [15], and pancreatic cells [16]. This paper focuses on the electrophysiological function of HCN channels in the central nervous system. In the brain, HCN1 isoform is expressed strongly in cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and superior colliculus [17], and HCN2 is expressed ubiquitously in the brain. Expression of HCN3 and HCN4 is found in localized regions in the brain [18]. In the neuron, HCN channels are found in dendrites, somas, and axon terminals. Expression in axon terminals is reported at the calyx of Held [19] and the globus pallidus neurons [20]. Previous reports showed that expression of HCN channels on the cell surface is uneven in some neurons. HCN channels are expressed more strongly in distal dendrites than in somas in thalamic reticular neurons, whereas they distribute nearly evenly in thalamocortical relay neurons [21]. Recently, isoform-specific localization is also reported. For example, HCN1 is expressed strongly in dendrites in layer 5 pyramidal neurons of matured rats, whereas HCN2 is mainly expressed in the soma [22].

Expression and kinetics of HCN channels are affected by unusual neuronal activity like epilepsy and environmental stimuli. Decrease in HCN channel expression is often observed in epilepsy models [2326]. The molecular mechanism underlying HCN channel downregulation following epilepsy is not well understood. Recent studies showed that channel current and surface expression of HCN channels decrease in one hour after pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus, but decreases in total channel protein and mRNA occur in the subsequent week [27]. Altered voltage dependence is also reported in epilepsy. Involvement of activation of calcineurin and inactivation of P38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) in the hyperpolarizing shift of voltage-dependence is reported [25].

On the other hand, some reports showed that sensory inputs are necessary to increase or keep the expression level of HCN channels. Deprivation of whiskers decreases the expression of dendritic HCN channels in the rat somatosensory cortex [28]. Interestingly, Adams et al. [24] reported increased HCN2 in CA3 and decreased HCN1 and HCN2 in CA1 in the same epilepsy model. Mechanisms underlying the regulation of HCN channel expression require further investigations.

3. Functional Roles of HCN Channels

Based on the multifaceted features, HCN channels are involved in many kinds of functions that range from cellular to behavior levels (working memory task [29], initiation of neuropathic pain [10]). In this paper, we focus on neuron-level functions, which include regulation of resting membrane potential, normalization of synaptic inputs, selective filtering for coincident inputs, modulation of intrinsic cellular frequency characteristics, and regulation of membrane resistance. They are categorized into three groups: excitatory, inhibitory, and modulatory functions. We summarize these functions and show typical examples of stimulations obtained by using NEURON simulator (Figure 1(a)) [30]. Conditions for the simulation are summarized at the end of the text.

3.1. Excitatory Function

Because a typical current reversal potential of HCN channels is about −30 mV that is higher than the normal threshold for the generation of action potential, HCN channel currents depolarize and control the membrane potential near the resting membrane potential. When HCN channel conductance is removed, a simulated neuron shows a hyperpolarized membrane potential (Figure 1(b)). For example, blockade of HCN channels induces hyperpolarization in the rat superior colliculus [17]. Although HCN channel conductance decreases the EPSP amplitude (see below and Figure 2(a)), this inhibitory effect is masked by depolarization of the membrane potential (Figure 1(c)). In addition, the effect of inhibitory synaptic inputs is suppressed by HCN channels, because hyperpolarizing conductance of inhibitory synaptic input opens HCN channels to evoke depolarizing conductance [31].

When voltage dependence of HCN channels is shifted to the depolarizing direction by cAMP or PIP2, HCN channels can be active at around the resting membrane potential and can work as an excitatory factor. Furthermore, in an interesting case, dendritic HCN channels are necessary to generate dendritic spikes at a short and fixed latency following optic fiber stimulation in the rat superior colliculus [17].

3.2. Inhibitory Function

Activated HCN channel conductance reduces the membrane resistance (Figure 1(d)). This reduction suppresses the impact of synaptic inputs on membrane potential. As HCN channels activate more, the amplitude and kinetics of postsynaptic potentials become smaller and shorter (Figures 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), and 2(d)).

3.3. Modulatory Function

Dendritic HCN channels normalize synaptic inputs in the cortical and hippocampal neurons. Current density of HCN channels increases along with the distance from the soma in hippocampal [32] and neocortical pyramidal neurons [33]. Such dendritic HCN channels scale the EPSP amplitude measured at the soma and suppress the location dependency of synaptic inputs in hippocampal [34] and neocortical pyramidal neurons [35]. We use two models with the gradient and even HCN channel distributions (Figure 3(a)), and computer simulation can reproduce a similar effect (Figure 3(b)). Interestingly note that, despite of different HCN channel distributions, both models show similar current amplitudes and overlapping voltage dependence of HCN channels in this condition (Figures 3(c) and 3(d)).

Activated HCN channels are involved in the detection of coincidental synaptic inputs. Because HCN channel conductance shortens the rise time and decay time of the EPSPs through the decrease in membrane resistance (Figure 2), summation of repetitive EPSPs that occur at a low frequency is suppressed. This suppression filters out low-frequency inputs, and thus improves the selectivity for synchronous synaptic inputs [36] (Figure 4(a)).

Active conductance of ion channels enables neurons to produce intrinsic membrane potential oscillation and resonance [37]. Such rhythmic activity can filter inputs at certain frequencies [38], and can influence the precision of spike timing [39, 40]. HCN channel currents filter out the slow frequency inputs [41, 42]. Our simulation successfully shows that HCN channel conductance suppresses intrinsic activities particularly around 10 Hz (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)).

4. Influence of Other Ion Channels on the Roles of HCN Channels

Because HCN channels can work as both excitatory and inhibitory factors, it is difficult to predict which is the major role of HCN channels in controlling neural activity without conducting actual experiments. Other ion channels that are activated at similar potentials make the prediction more difficult. For example, K+ channels and CaV3 (T-type) Ca2+ channels can indirectly affect the activation of HCN channels through modulation of membrane potential and resistance, and vice versa [43, 44]. Especially, delayed-rectifier M-type K+ channels (Km), also called KV7 or KCNQ channels, have a large impact on the role of the HCN channels, because Km channels open slowly at relatively polarized potentials from about −60 mV and do not inactivate [45]. George et al. [44](2009) showed that Km channels determine whether HCN channels function as an excitatory or an inhibitory factor, on the basis of recordings from hippocampal pyramidal neurons and computational simulation of model neurons.

We further advanced the simulation study and examined the role of Km channel conductance on the threshold potential for spike generation by using a model neuron with conductances for HCN, Km, delayed rectifier K+, Na+, and Ca2+ channels. Our simulation reproduces a similar effect of Km channels on the HCN channel function (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). For a weak synaptic input, the membrane potential at the peak EPSPs ( 𝑉 p e a k ) is more depolarized with HCN channel conductance than without HCN channel conductance (Figure 5(b)). But as the synaptic input becomes stronger, the relation between 𝑉 p e a k with and without HCN channel conductance reverses. The crossing point of the relationship shifts in a Km conductance-dependent manner (Figure 5(b)). Because our model contains Na+ conductances, we can also analyze the effect of HCN channel conductance on the threshold potential to generate action potential in various Km conductance conditions. Our simulation suggests that when Km conductance is very small, HCN channel conductance reduces the minimum intensity of synaptic input to generate action potential. But when Km conductance becomes large, HCN channel conductance increases the minimum intensity of synaptic input to generate action potential (Figure 5(c)). The relationships between required intensity of synaptic input and Km conductance with and without HCN channel conductance crosses (Figure 5(d)). Conversely, when T-type Ca2+ channel conductance was altered to shift the action potential threshold, the relation of the threshold does not reverse in our simulation condition (Figures 5(e) and 5(f)).

A previous study showed that presynaptic HCN1 channels regulate CaV3.2 channel activity and neurotransmission at specific cortical synapses [46]. In order to uncover how HCN channels contribute to the neural activity, it will be necessary to compare the effects of K+ channels and Ca2+ channels by actual experiments.

5. Effects of Modulators of HCN Channel

To elucidate the role of HCN channels in the neuron, modulators of HCN channels are indispensable. A number of modulators are reported for HCN channels (summarized by Lewis et al. [47]). Previous studies showed that cAMP, PIP2, and ethanol shift the voltage dependence to the depolarizing direction and accelerate the gating kinetics [48, 49]. In contrast, TRIP8b shifts the voltage dependence to the hyperpolarizing direction and slows the kinetics. These modulators can shift the voltage dependence by as large as 10 mV in either direction. We examined the effect of such shifts of voltage dependence on neural activity as well as effects of Km and T-type channel conductance. Briefly, hyperpolarizing and depolarizing shifts of the voltage dependence, respectively, result in decrease and increase in channel conductance (Figures 5(g) and 5(h)). Such modulation occurs during the maturation process in medial superior olive neurons [12]. Importance of modulated voltage dependence of HCN channels in the nervous system has already reported. For example, HCN channels are inhibited via suppression of cAMP by the activation of α2A-adrenoceptors that are colocalized with HCN channels in dendritic spines in the prefrontal cortex. This inhibition results in improved working memory in monkey and rat [29]. Increased neural activity caused by enhanced HCN channel activity with cAMP is involved in the initiation of neuropathic pain [10].

6. Involvement of HCN Channels in Neural Diseases

Previous reports showed the involvement of HCN channels in brain disorders, including absence seizures, febrile seizures, and Parkinson’s disease. Reduced HCN channel activity following the establishment of status epilepticus is reported in many epilepsy models [2326]. Decreased HCN channel activity is also reported in the external segment of the globus pallidus in rodent models of Parkinson’s disease [50]. It is not known well, however, whether such reductions precede or follow the onset of the diseases. Genetic mutations of HCN channels are found in human epilepsy ([51, 52], and references therein). HCN2 null mice show absence epilepsy [53], and HCN1 null mice are more susceptible to kainic acid-induced seizures [13]. These reports imply, at least, dysfunction of HCN channel can promote the onset of seizures.

7. Conclusion

Because HCN channels can work both excitatory and inhibitory, and these effects can be altered by pharmacological modulation, HCN channels are one of the promising pharmacological targets in treating diseases of the brain. Further studies about complex relations between HCN channels and other ion channels and about mechanisms underlying modulation of voltage dependence will provide us a concrete step for clinical usage of HCN channel modulation.

8. Simulation Condition

For computer simulation, a simplified neuron model is used, because the complicated dendritic structure can be compactified according to the Rall’s rule [54] (Figure 1(a)). Membrane capacitance (1.4 μF/cm2) and axial resistance (150 Ω·cm) are even throughout the neuronal structure. The model neuron contains conductances for two kinds of Na+ channels, delayed rectifier K+ channel, muscarinic K+ (Km) channel, and HCN channel. In addition, nonspecific leak conductance is set in all models (conductance, 40 μS/cm2; reversal potential, −70 mV). Conductance for the T-type Ca2+ channel is included in some of the simulations, where addition is explicitly stated. Most conductances, except for delayed rectifier K+ and Km channels [55], are taken from a model of the rat subthalamic nucleus [56]. In order to change the voltage dependence, we shifted membrane potential ±7 mV in PROCEDURE section of mod file. Conductance density for each channel is summarized in Table 1. Unless stated otherwise, synaptic input is always applied to the soma using the Exp2Syn function of the NEURON simulator (tau1, 1.5 ms; tau2, 4 ms). Reversal potentials of excitatory and inhibitory inputs are 0 and −85 mV, respectively.


Name of ion channelConductance (S/cm2)Accession of ModelDB

Na+ channelSoma: 0.1 dendrite: 0.0174298
Original Na+ channel of Na+ channelInitial segment: 0.1Shift voltage dependence
Delayed rectifier K+ channel0.4101629
Muscarinic K+ channel0.4101629
HCN channel0.4 (otherwise noted)74298
Cav3 Ca2+ channel0.174298

ModelDB: https://senselab.med.yale.edu/modeldb.

References

  1. A. Noma and H. Irisawa, “Membrane currents in the rabbit sinoatrial node cell as studied by the double microelectrode method,” Pflügers Archiv, vol. 364, no. 1, pp. 45–52, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  2. H. Brown and D. Difrancesco, “Voltage-clamp investigations of membrane currents underlying pace-maker activity in rabbit sino-atrial node,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 308, pp. 331–351, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  3. J. Maylie, M. Morad, and J. Weiss, “A study of pace-marker potential in rabbit sino-atrial node: measurement of potassium activity under voltage-clamp conditions,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 311, pp. 161–178, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
  4. C. W. Siu, D. K. Lieu, and R. A. Li, “HCN-encoded pacemaker channels: from physiology and biophysics to bioengineering,” Journal of Membrane Biology, vol. 214, no. 3, pp. 115–122, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Biel, C. Wahl-Schott, S. Michalakis, and X. Zong, “Hyperpolarization-activated cation channels: from genes to function,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 847–885, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. R. B. Robinson and S. A. Siegelbaum, “Hyperpolarization-activated cation currents: from molecules to physiological function,” Annual Review of Physiology, vol. 65, pp. 453–480, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. Chen, J. S. Mitcheson, M. Lin, and M. C. Sanguinetti, “Functional roles of charged residues in the putative voltage sensor of the HCN2 pacemaker channel,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 46, pp. 36465–36471, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. L. Vaca, J. Stieber, X. Zong, A. Ludwig, F. Hofmann, and M. Biel, “Mutations in the S4 domain of a pacemaker channel alter its voltage dependence,” FEBS Letters, vol. 479, no. 1-2, pp. 35–40, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. R. Männikkö, F. Elinder, and H. P. Larsson, “Voltage-sensing mechanism is conserved among ion channels gated by opposite voltages,” Nature, vol. 419, no. 6909, pp. 837–841, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. E. C. Emery, G. T. Young, E. M. Berrocoso, L. Chen, and P. A. McNaughton, “HCN2 ion channels play a central role in inflammatory and neuropathic pain,” Science, vol. 333, no. 6048, pp. 1462–1466, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  11. P. Pian, A. Bucchi, A. DeCostanzo, R. B. Robinson, and S. A. Siegelbaum, “Modulation of cyclic nucleotide-regulated HCN channels by PIP2 and receptors coupled to phospholipase C,” Pflügers Archiv, vol. 455, no. 1, pp. 125–145, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. Khurana, Z. Liu, A. S. Lewis, K. Rosa, D. Chetkovich, and N. L. Golding, “An essential role for modulation of hyperpolarization-activated current in the development of binaural temporal precision,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 2814–2823, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  13. Z. Huang, M. C. Walker, and M. M. Shah, “Loss of dendritic HCN1 subunits enhances cortical excitability and epileptogenesis,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 35, pp. 10979–10988, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. V. Halliwell and P. R. Adams, “Voltage-clamp analysis of muscarinic excitation in hippocampal neurons,” Brain Research, vol. 250, no. 1, pp. 71–92, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. D. R. Stevens, R. Seifert, B. Bufe et al., “Hyperpolarization-activated channels HCN1 and HCN4 mediate responses to sour stimuli,” Nature, vol. 413, no. 6856, pp. 631–635, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. W. El-Kholy, P. E. MacDonald, J. M. Fox et al., “Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels in pancreatic β-cell,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 753–764, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. T. Endo, E. Tarusawa, T. Notomi et al., “Dendritic Ih ensures high-fidelity dendritic spike responses of motion-sensitive neurons in rat superior colliculus,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 2066–2076, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. T. Notomi and R. Shigemoto, “Immunohistochemical localization of Ih channel subunits, HCN1–4, in the rat brain,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 471, no. 3, pp. 241–276, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H. Huang and L. O. Trussell, “KCNQ5 channels control resting properties and release probability of a synapse,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 840–847, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. Boyes, J. P. Bolam, R. Shigemoto, and I. M. Stanford, “Functional presynaptic HCN channels in the rat globus pallidus,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 2081–2092, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Y. Abbas, S. W. Ying, and P. A. Goldstein, “Compartmental distribution of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic-nucleotide-gated channel 2 and hyperpolarization-activated cyclic-nucleotide-gated channel 4 in thalamic reticular and thalamocortical relay neurons,” Neuroscience, vol. 141, no. 4, pp. 1811–1825, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. E. Atkinson and S. R. Williams, “Postnatal development of dendritic synaptic integration in rat neocortical pyramidal neurons,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 735–751, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Jung, T. D. Jones, J. N. Lugo et al., “Progressive dendritic HCN channelopathy during epileptogenesis in the rat pilocarpine model of epilepsy,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 47, pp. 13012–13021, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. B. E. L. Adams, C. A. Reid, D. Myers et al., “Excitotoxic-mediated transcriptional decreases in HCN2 channel function increase network excitability in CA1,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 249–257, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. S. Jung, J. B. Bullis, I. H. Lau, T. D. Jones, L. N. Warner, and N. P. Poolos, “Downregulation of dendritic HCN channel gating in epilepsy is mediated by altered phosphorylation signaling,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 19, pp. 6678–6688, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. D. Kase, T. Inoue, and K. Imoto, “Roles of the subthalamic nucleus and subthalamic HCN channels in absence seizures,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 393–406, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. Jung, L. N. Warner, J. Pitsch, A. J. Becker, and N. P. Poolos, “Rapid loss of dendritic HCN channel expression in hippocampal pyramidal neurons following status epilepticus,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 40, pp. 14291–14295, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  28. J. D. Breton and G. J. Stuart, “Loss of sensory input increases the intrinsic excitability of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in rat barrel cortex,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 587, no. 21, pp. 5107–5119, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. Wang, B. P. Ramos, C. D. Paspalas et al., “α2A-adrenoceptors strengthen working memory networks by inhibiting cAMP-HCN channel signaling in prefrontal cortex,” Cell, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 397–410, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. L. Hines and N. T. Carnevale, The Neuron Book, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2006.
  31. J. F. Atherton, K. Kitano, J. Baufreton et al., “Selective participation of somatodendritic HCN channels in inhibitory but not excitatory synaptic integration in neurons of the subthalamic nucleus,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 47, pp. 16025–16040, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. C. Magee, “Dendritic hyperpolarization-activated currents modify the integrative properties of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 19, pp. 7613–7624, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  33. T. Berger, M. E. Larkum, and H. R. Lüscher, “High Ih channel density in the distal apical dendrite of layer V pyramidal cells increases bidirectional attenuation of EPSPs,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 855–868, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  34. J. C. Magee, “Erratum: dendritic I(h) normalizes temporal summation in hippocampal CA1,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 2, no. 9, p. 848, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  35. S. R. Williams and G. J. Stuart, “Site independence of EPSP time course is mediated by dendritic Ih in neocortical pyramidal neurons,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 3177–3182, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  36. D. L. F. Garden, P. D. Dodson, C. O'Donnell, M. D. White, and M. F. Nolan, “Tuning of synaptic integration in the medial entorhinal cortex to the organization of grid cell firing fields,” Neuron, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 875–889, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. B. Hutcheon and Y. Yarom, “Resonance, oscillation and the intrinsic frequency preferences of neurons,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 216–222, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. F. G. Pike, R. S. Goddard, J. M. Suckling, P. Ganter, N. Kasthuri, and O. Paulsen, “Distinct frequency preferences of different types of rat hippocampal neurones in response to oscillatory input currents,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 529, no. 1, pp. 205–213, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  39. J. Kwag and O. Paulsen, “Bidirectional control of spike timing by GABAA receptor-mediated inhibition during theta oscillation in CA1 pyramidal neurons,” NeuroReport, vol. 20, no. 13, pp. 1209–1213, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. D. McLelland and O. Paulsen, “Neuronal oscillations and the rate-to-phase transform: mechanism, model and mutual information,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 587, no. 4, pp. 769–785, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. R. Zemankovics, S. Káli, O. Paulsen, T. F. Freund, and N. Hájos, “Differences in subthreshold resonance of hippocampal pyramidal cells and interneurons: the role of h-current and passive membrane characteristics,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 588, no. 12, pp. 2109–2132, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. W. N. Xue, Y. Wang, S. M. He, X. L. Wang, J. L. Zhu, and G. D. Gao, “SK- and h-current contribute to the generation of theta-like resonance of rat substantia nigra pars compacta dopaminergic neurons at hyperpolarized membrane potentials,” Brain Structure and Function, vol. 217, no. 2, pp. 379–394, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. G. Meuth, T. Kanyshkova, P. Meuth et al., “Membrane resting potential of thalamocortical relay neurons is shaped by the interaction among TASK3 and HCN2 channels,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 1517–1529, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. S. George, L. F. Abbott, and S. A. Siegelbaum, “HCN hyperpolarization-activated cation channels inhibit EPSPs by interactions with M-type K+ channels,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 577–584, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. D. A. Brown and G. M. Passmore, “Neural KCNQ (Kv7) channels,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 156, no. 8, pp. 1185–1195, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. Z. Huang, R. Lujan, I. Kadurin et al., “Presynaptic HCN1 channels regulate CaV3.2 activity and neurotransmission at select cortical synapses,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 478–486, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. A. S. Lewis, C. M. Estep, and D. M. Chetkovich, “The fast and slow ups and downs of HCN channel regulation,” Channels, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 215–231, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  48. T. Tateno and H. P. Robinson, “The mechanism of ethanol action on midbrain dopaminergic neuron firing: a dynamic-clamp study of the role of Ih and GABAergic synaptic integration,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 1901–1922, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. W. Ying, G. R. Tibbs, A. Picollo et al., “PIP2-mediated HCN3 channel gating is crucial for rhythmic burst firing in thalamic intergeniculate leaflet neurons,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 28, pp. 10412–10423, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. C. S. Chan, K. E. Glajch, T. S. Gertler et al., “HCN channelopathy in external globus pallidus neurons in models of Parkinson's disease,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 85–92, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. J. C. DiFrancesco, A. Barbuti, R. Milanesi et al., “Recessive loss-of-function mutation in the pacemaker HCN2 channel causing increased neuronal excitability in a patient with idiopathic generalized epilepsy,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 48, pp. 17327–17337, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. C. A. Reid, A. M. Phillips, and S. Petrou, “HCN channelopathies: pathophysiology in genetic epilepsy and therapeutic implications,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. A. Ludwig, T. Budde, J. Stieber et al., “Absence epilepsy and sinus dysrhythmia in mice lacking the pacemaker channel HCN2,” EMBO Journal, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 216–224, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. W. Rall and J. Rinzel, “Branch input resistance and steady attenuation for input to one branch of a dendritic neuron model,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 648–688, 1973. View at: Google Scholar
  55. P. Hemond, D. Epstein, A. Boley, M. Migliore, G. A. Ascoli, and D. B. Jaffe, “Distinct classes of pyramidal cells exhibit mutually exclusive firing patterns in hippocampal area CA3b,” Hippocampus, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 411–424, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. A. Gillies and D. Willshaw, “Models of the subthalamic nucleus: the importance of intranuclear connectivity,” Medical Engineering and Physics, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 723–732, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Daisuke Kase and Keiji Imoto. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

16048 Views | 5095 Downloads | 34 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.