Table of Contents
Journal of Structures
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 329130, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/329130
Research Article

Enhancing Seismic Capacity of Pile-Supported Wharves Using Yielding Dampers

School of Civil Engineering, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 11365-4563, Tehran, Iran

Received 15 February 2013; Revised 5 May 2013; Accepted 13 May 2013

Academic Editor: Domenico Bruno

Copyright © 2013 Seyed Amin Mousavi and Khosrow Bargi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. N. Gerolymos, A. Giannakou, I. Anastasopoulos, and G. Gazetas, “Evidence of beneficial role of inclined piles: observations and summary of numerical analyses,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 705–722, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. G. Poulos, “Raked piles—virtues and drawbacks,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 132, no. 6, pp. 795–803, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Oyenuga, E. Abrahamson, A. Krimotat, A. Kozak, T. Labasco, and F. Lobedan, “A study of the pile-wharf deck connection at the Port of Oakland,” in Ports 2001: American’s Ports-Gateways to the Global Economy, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. E. Lehman, E. Brackmann, A. Jellin, and C. W. Roeder, “Seismic performance of pile-wharf connections,” in Proceedings of the ASCE Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering Conference (TCLEE '09), p. 84, Oakland, Calif, USA, July 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Mageau and K. Chin, “Effectiveness of stone columns on slope deformations beneath wharves,” in Proceedings of the ASCE Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering Conference (TCLEE '09), p. 94, Oakland, Calif, USA, July 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. T. Soong and G. Dargush, Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering, Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1997.
  7. C. Xia and R. D. Hanson, “Influence of ADAS element parameters on building seismic response,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 1903–1918, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Foti, L. Bozzo, and F. Lopez-Almansa, “Numerical efficiency assessment of energy dissipaters for seismic protection of buildings,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 27, pp. 543–556, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  9. L. M. Moreschi and M. P. Singh, “Design of yielding metallic and friction dampers for optimal seismic performance,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1291–1311, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. F. C. Ponzo, A. di Cesare, D. Nigro et al., “JET-PACS project: dynamic experimental tests and numerical results obtained for a steel frame equipped with hysteretic damped chevron braces,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 16, pp. 662–685, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  11. I. Towhata, M. J. Alam, T. Honda, and S. Tamate, “Model tests on behaviour of gravity-type quay walls subjected to strong shaking,” Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 47–56, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Sadrekarimi, A. Ghalandarzadeh, and J. Sadrekarimi, “Static and dynamic behavior of hunchbacked gravity quay walls,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 99–117, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. OCDI, Technical Standards and Commentaries for Port and Harbor Facilities in Japan, The Overseas Coastal Area Development Institute of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, 2002.
  14. PEER, Strong Ground Motion Database, 2009, http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/.
  15. S. Mazzoni, F. McKenna, M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves, The OpenSees Command Language Manual: Version 1.7.3, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, University of California, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 2006.
  16. S. A. Mousavi, K. Bargi, and S. M. Zahrai, “Optimum parameters of tuned liquid column-gas damper for mitigation of seismic-induced vibrations of offshore jacket platforms,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 422–444, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  17. Matlab, User Guide, Curve Fitting Toolbox, MathWorks Inc., Version 7.6.0, 2008.
  18. Applied Technology Council (ATC), “Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings,” Tech. Rep. ATC 40, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, Calif, USA, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  19. ASCE, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (FEMA356), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
  20. M. Tehranizadeh, “Passive energy dissipation device for typical steel frame building in Iran,” Engineering Structures, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 643–655, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. L. Kramer, Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1996.
  22. R. W. Boulanger, C. J. Curras, B. L. Kutter, D. W. Wilson, and A. Abghari, “Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analyses,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 125, no. 9, pp. 750–759, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. F. Castelli and M. Maugeri, “Simplified approach for the seismic response of a pile foundation,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 135, no. 10, pp. 1440–1451, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. P. Bardet, K. Ichii, and C. H. Lin, A Computer Program for Equivalent-Linear Earthquake Site Response Analyses, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, 2000.
  25. A. Takahashi and J. Takemura, “Liquefaction-induced large displacement of pile-supported wharf,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 811–825, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus