Table of Contents
Journal of Theoretical Chemistry
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 240491, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/240491
Research Article

Calculation of the Quantum-Mechanical Tunneling in Bound Potentials

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA

Received 28 January 2014; Accepted 1 April 2014; Published 24 April 2014

Academic Editor: Anton Kokalj

Copyright © 2014 Sophya Garashchuk et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. X.-Z. Li, B. Walker, and A. Michaelides, “Quantum nature of the hydrogen bond,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 16, pp. 6369–6373, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. J. Sutclie and N. S. Scrutton, “A new conceptual framework for enzyme catalysis,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 269, no. 13, pp. 3096–3102, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. A. P. Jardine, E. Y. M. Lee, D. J. Ward et al., “Determination of the quantum contribution to the activated motion of hydrogen on a metal surface: H/Pt(111),” Physical Review Letters, vol. 105, no. 13, Article ID 136101, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. S. Iyengar, I. Sumner, and J. Jakowski, “Hydrogen tunneling in an enzyme active site: a quantum wavepacket dynamical perspective,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 112, no. 25, pp. 7601–7613, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. J. Knapp, K. Rickert, and J. P. Klinman, “Temperature-dependent isotope effects in soybean Lipoxygenase-1: correlating hydrogen tunneling with protein dynamics,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 124, no. 15, pp. 3865–3874, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. R. Schreiner, H. P. Reisenauer, D. Ley, D. Gerbig, C. Wu, and W. D. Allen, “Methylhydroxycarbene: tunneling control of a chemical reaction,” Science, vol. 332, no. 6035, pp. 1300–1303, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. J. Shannon, M. A. Blitz, A. Goddard, and D. E. Heard, “Accelerated chemistry in the reaction between the hydroxyl radical and methanol at interstellar temperatures facilitated by tunnelling,” Nature Chemistry, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 745–749, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. S. Hay, C. R. Pudney, T. A. McGrory, J. Pang, M. J. Sutcliffe, and N. S. Scrutton, “Barrier compression enhances an enzymatic hydrogen-transfer reaction,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 1452–1454, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Hay, L. O. Johannissen, M. J. Sutclie, and N. S. Scrutton, “Barrier compression and its contribution to both classical and quantum mechanical aspects of enzyme catalysis,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 121–128, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. S. Hay and N. S. Scrutton, “Good vibrations in enzyme-catalysed reactions,” Nature Chemistry, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 161–168, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. G. Newton, Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1982.
  12. W. H. Miller, S. D. Schwartz, and J. W. Tromp, “Quantum mechanical rate constants for bimolecular reactions,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 79, no. 10, pp. 4889–4898, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. E. Makarov and H. Metiu, “The reaction rate constant in a system with localized trajectories in the transition region: classical and quantum dynamics,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 107, no. 19, pp. 7787–7799, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Y. Ge and J. Zhang, “Quantum mechanical tunneling through a time-dependent barrier,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 105, no. 19, pp. 8628–8632, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. W. H. Miller, “Quantum mechanical transition state theory and a new semiclassical model for reaction rate constants,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1823–1834, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 1999.
  17. J. H. Weiner, “Quantum rate theory for a symmetric double-well potential,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 2492–2506, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. Madelung, “Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer form,” Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 40, no. 3-4, pp. 322–326, 1927. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. B. Poirier, “Reconciling semiclassical and Bohmian mechanics. I. Stationary states,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 121, no. 10, pp. 4501–4515, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. N. Rom, E. Engdahl, and N. Moiseyev, “Tunneling rates in bound systems using smooth exterior complex scaling within the framework of the finite basis set approximation,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 3413–3419, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Vanicek, W. H. Miller, J. F. Castillo, and F. J. Aoiz, “Quantum-instanton evaluation of the kinetic isotope effects,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 123, no. 5, Article ID 054108, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. I. R. Craig and D. E. Manolopoulos, “Chemical reaction rates from ring polymer molecular dynamics,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 122, no. 8, Article ID 084106, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. A. V. Turbiner, “Double well potential: perturbation theory, tunneling, WKB (beyond instantons),” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 25, no. 2-3, pp. 647–658, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. J. H. Weiner, “Transmission function vs energy splitting in tunneling calculations,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 4743–4849, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. D. Bohm, “A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables. I,” Physical Review, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 166–193, 1952. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. Maple 14 and 16. Maplesoft, a division of Waterloo Maple Inc., Waterloo, Canada, http://www.maplesoft.com/.
  27. D. T. Colbert and W. H. Miller, “A novel discrete variable representation for quantum mechanical reactive scattering via the S-matrix Kohn method,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 1982–1991, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. D. J. Tannor and D. E. Weeks, “Wave packet correlation function formulation of scattering theory: the quantum analog of classical S-matrix theory,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 3884–3893, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. Koslo, “Time-dependent quantum-mechanical methods for molecular dynamics,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 2087–2100, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. M. D. Feit, J. A. Fleck Jr., and A. Steiger, “Solution of the Schrödinger equation by a spectral method,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 412–433, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Y. Shao, L. F. Molnar, Y. Jung et al., “Advances in methods and algorithms in a modern quantum chemistry program package,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 8, no. 27, pp. 3172–3191, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus