Table of Contents
Journal of Textiles
Volume 2014, Article ID 363079, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/363079
Research Article

Dyeing of Polyester and Polyamide Synthetic Fabrics with Natural Dyes Using Ecofriendly Technique

1Chemical Metrology, National Institute of Standards, Cairo 12211, Egypt
2Department of Textile Printing, Dyeing and Finishing, Faculty of Applied Arts, Damietta University, Damietta 34512, Egypt

Received 28 July 2014; Revised 30 October 2014; Accepted 31 October 2014; Published 24 November 2014

Academic Editor: Ricardo Molina

Copyright © 2014 Khaled Elnagar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This work presents an ecofriendly method for dyeing synthetic fabrics with natural dyes using UV/ozone pretreatment to activate fiber and improve dyeability of polyester and nylon. Fabrics are pretreated with UV/ozone for different periods of time ranged from 5 min to 120 min. Effect of pretreatment on surface morphology was studied by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Mechanical behavior was studied by testing tensile strength and elongation percentage. Chemical modification of the surface was studied using attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (ATR-FTIR). Dyeability of the treated samples was investigated in terms of their colour strength expressed as K/s in addition to fastness to washing and light. This research showed the increment of the affinity of the studied synthetic fabrics towards curcumin and saffron natural dyes using ecofriendly technique.

1. Introduction

With the continued increase in the use of synthetic fibers in the last fifteen years, many investigations have been carried out with the objective of obtaining a better understanding of improving chemical and physical properties of synthetic fibers.

These fibers surpass the production of natural fibers with a market share of 54.4%. The advantages of these fibers are their high modulus and strength, stiffness, stretch or elasticity, wrinkle and abrasion resistances, relatively low cost, convenient processing, tailor-able performance, and easy recycling. The downside to synthetic fibers use are reduced wearing comfort, build-up of electrostatic charge, the tendency to pill, difficulties in finishing, poor soil release properties, and low dyeability. These disadvantages are largely associated with their hydrophobic nature. To render their surfaces hydrophilic, various physical, chemical, and bulk modification methods are employed to mimic the advantageous properties of their natural counterparts [1].

The classical chemical modification of synthetic polymers, using strong alkaline or acid agents, requires high amounts of energy and chemicals (binders, coupling agents, etc.), which are partially discharged to the environment. Furthermore, some of the substances used, due to their weak bonding, are released from the end-products, presenting potential health risks and reducing the technical lifetime of the products. Although alkaline products render synthetic fibres more hydrophilic, they also lead to the deterioration of other properties causing irreversible yellowing and loss of resistance. In order to reduce the use of such chemicals and their environmental impact, new technologies have been developed to replace classical methodologies [2, 3].

One of the potentially more effective and economical methods for synthetic fabrics surface modification is ultraviolet ozone (UV/O3) treatment with significant depth. In UV/O3 treatment, two different UV radiations are present. One has a wavelength of 184.9 nm (λ1), and the other has a wavelength of 253.7 nm (λ2). When the molecules on the surface of synthetic polymers are exposed to the UV lights, excitation and dissociation of the polymeric molecules by the short-wavelength UV radiation take place. This is known as a photosensitized oxidation process. This treatment, also, changes the surface morphology and topography of the polymer. The SEM (scanning electron microscopy) images of the samples showed a marked increase in the grain size and the surface roughness of the irradiated polymer in comparison to the surface of the untreated samples. This method is suitable for synthetic fabric pretreatment and does not cause damage by heat to the fabrics because the modification is carried out under mild thermal conditions (or low temperatures). Thus, beneficial improvements to synthetic fabrics dyeability, printability, and shrink resistance properties can be achieved [4, 5].

In the recent years, there has been a trend to revive the art of natural dyeing. This is a result of the stringent environmental standards imposed by many countries in response to the toxic and allergic reactions associated with synthetic dyes. Natural dyes are more ecofriendly than synthetic dyes and can exhibit better biodegradability and generally have a higher compatibility with the environment [6, 7].

This study is to improve the hydrophilicity of synthetic fabrics via UV/O3 irradiation and to impart deep coloring effect of the irradiated synthetic fabrics when dyed with natural dyes.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials
2.1.1. Fabrics

In this study, 100% scoured and bleached plain weave polyester (109 g/m2), nylon (119 g/m2) fabrics were used. Fabrics were purchased from Misr for Spinning and Weaving Company, Mahalla El-Kobra, Egypt.

2.1.2. Natural Dyes

Curcumin and saffron were purchased from Riedel de Haen Ag Seelze Hannover Company, Germany, and were used as natural dyes.

2.1.3. Chemicals

Ferrous sulphate (FeSO4) was used as a mordant, and sodium sulphate and sodium carbonate were purchased from Algmohria Company, Egypt, and were used as chemicals reagent.

2.2. Methods
2.2.1. UV/Ozone Treatment

UV/O3 irradiation was carried out using high intensity; low-pressure mercury lamp without outer envelope (LRF 02971, 200 watts, 220 volts, made in Poland) was placed in a cubic box of side length 60 cm. Samples’ strips were hanged around the source at a distance (~20 cm), for different periods 5, 20, 50, 110, and 120 minutes, respectively [8, 9].

2.2.2. Dyeing Procedure

(A) Mordanting. The polyester and nylon fabrics were premordanted by treating in a bath containing ferrous sulphate 6% (owf) keeping material to liquor ratio 1 : 15 at 60°C for 60 min followed by rinsing with cold water and well drying [10].

(B) Dyeing with Natural Dyes. All the dyeing experiments were carried out by exhaustion method in a water bath containing the dye extract.

(1) Dyeing with Curcumin Dye. The premordanted polyester and nylon fabrics were introduced, respectively, into the dye bath containing 2% curcumin dye (Figure 1) at a material-to-liquor ratio 1 : 15 at 70°C in the presence of 50 gm/L sodium sulphate to promote exhaustion. Dyeing was maintained for 100 min. The dyed samples were washed with cold water and dried well at room temperature [10, 11].

363079.fig.001
Figure 1: Chemical structure of curcumin.

(2) Dyeing with Saffron Dye. The premordanted polyester and nylon fabrics were introduced, respectively, into the dye bath containing 5% saffron dye (Figure 2) at room temperature which then increased to 85°C with gentle stirring, keeping the liquor ratio 1 : 30. The dyeing was then continued for one hour at pH 7-8 using 2 gm/L of sodium carbonate. After dyeing the samples were taken out of the bath and thoroughly washed with water [12].

363079.fig.002
Figure 2: Chemical structures of saffron.
2.3. Measurements and Analysis Testing
2.3.1. SEM Analysis

The scanning electron microscope (SEM) photographs were carried out for samples under our study using SEM Model Philips XL 30, with accelerating voltage 30 kV, magnification 10x up to 400.000x, and resolution for wavelength (3.5 nm). Samples are coated with gold. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) is used to examine the surface morphology of conventionally and UV/ozone treated polyester and nylon fabrics.

2.3.2. Mechanical Testing

The tensile strength and percentage elongation at break of untreated and treated samples for different periods were carried out according to the Standard Method (ASTM 2000) using a Shimadzu Universal Tester of (C.R.T)-type S-500 Japan.

2.3.3. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy with Attenuation Total Reflection (ATR-FTIR)

ATR-FTIR spectra of the above mentioned samples were recorded by means of Nicolet 380 Spectrometer using a zinc selenide crystal, in the wavelength range 650–4000 cm−1. To ensure reproducible contact between the crystal face and the fabric, a pressure of about 18 Kpa is applied to the crystal holder. The ATR-FTIR absorbance frequencies for the treated samples are recorded with an average of 128 scans using a resolution of 4 cm−1.

2.3.4. Colour Strength () and Colour Parameters Determination

These measurements were carried out using Colour Eye 3100 Spectrophotometer SDL, England. The colour strength () values of the different examined samples were determined from the reflection spectra values at the proper wavelength according to Kubelka Munk equation (AATCC, 1991) as follows: where “” is the decimal fraction of the reflectance of dyed fabric.

These () values represent the dyeability of the different treated and untreated samples.

2.3.5. Assessment of Color Fastness

(1) Fastness to Washing. The different (treated and untreated with UV/Ozone) dyed samples were stitched between two pieces of undyed cotton fabric (all fabric pieces had the same diameter) and then washed at 50°C for 30 min. The staining of the undyed adjacent fabric was assessed according to the following grey scale: 1, poor; 2, fair; 3, moderate; 4, good; 5, excellent (ISO 105-C01:1998).

(2) Fastness to Light. The different (treated and untreated with UV/O3) dyed samples are exposed to artificial daylight for 100 hours using Tera Light Fastness Tester [9] at temperature 25 ± 2°C and relative humidity 65 + 5% alongside with a Standard Grey Scale. The light fastness values are assessed visually according to the Standard Method (ISO 105:1997).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. SEM Analysis

The SEM images of the polyester and nylon fabrics in Figures 3 and 4 show that the untreated fabric has fairly smooth surface, and the existence of few small particles on the surface of the fibers are probably due to the insufficient removal of the chemicals during the washing stage. However, the surface morphology of the treated fabrics has been changed dramatically and there are different features on the surface of the fibers, such as grooves and voids and nanoscale surface roughness [13]. This modification may be owed to the etching of the fiber surface happening after the bombardment of the surface of the fibers with ions and free radicals. This surface roughening effect leads to either a light trapping phenomenon due to destructive interference or increase in the dyeing rate of the fiber, which is a consequence of increasing the surface area of the fiber. Both of these effects may be the reason for the increase in the of the fabrics after the treatment. UV/Ozone irradiation long period may also cause degree of oxidation with significant depth.

fig3
Figure 3: The SEM image of the polyester fabrics, (a) untreated sample, (b) treated sample, ×1500.
fig4
Figure 4: The SEM image of the nylon fabrics, (a) untreated sample, (b) treated sample, ×1500.
3.2. The Effect of the UV/O3 Treatment on the Mechanical Testing of the Synthetic Fabrics

The changes in the mechanical properties (tensile strength and percentage elongation at break) of blank unexposed polyester and nylon fabrics and those exposed to UV/O3 treatments are evaluated and the obtained results are represented in Table 1. These results showed that both the tensile strength and percentage elongation decreased. The changes in the mechanical properties of the examined fabric during exposure reflect not only the changes in the chemical structure of its polymer system but its supper molecular organization, that is, its morphology. Thus, these results assumed that the examined polyester and nylon samples had lost part of its strength by UV/Ozone treatment especially for the nylon fibers which may be due to the fact that such treatment had caused a removal of the surface layer of the synthetic fabrics. Due to the irradiation to UV/Ozone a degree of oxidation of the bulk polymer may also occur.

tab1
Table 1: The changes in the mechanical properties of the tested fabrics with UV/Ozone irradiation.
3.3. The Effect of UV/Ozone Treatment on the Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy with Attenuation Total Reflection (ATR-FTIR) of Synthetic Fabrics

The ATR-FTIR spectroscopic technique was employed to study the effect of UV/Ozone treatment on the % reflection values as a function of the wave number in the range from 4000 to 500 cm−1 of the major function time. Figures 5 and 6 show the spectra of untreated and UV/Ozone treated polyester and nylon fabrics. Figure 5 shows IR spectra of the polyester fabric. The waves were assigned as follows: 1717 cm−1 (C=O), 1407 cm−1 (aromatic ring), 1339 cm−1 and 1014 cm−1 (carboxylic ester or anhydride), 1092 cm−1 and 1014 cm−1 (O=C–O–C or secondary alcohol), 971 cm−1 (C=C), 872 cm−1 (five substituted H in benzene), 847 cm−1 (two neighboring H in benzene), and 724 cm−1 (heterocyclic aromatic ring). The main structure of the polyester sample had ester, alcohol, anhydride, aromatic ring, and heterocyclic aromatic rings. Alcohol was able to react with anhydride and produce ester groups. That was the reason there was still alcohol and anhydride as residual reactants left in the polyester. The carboxyl, ester, anhydride, and alcohol groups showed the polyester fabric was not pure PET. The peak at 1407 cm−1 corresponded to the aromatic ring which was a stable group. It was the characteristic absorption peak of PET. The peaks at 1717 and 1092 cm−1 were assigned to the ester group which preferred to break under certain conditions. From Figure 5 the increment of the intensity of the most characteristic groups due to oxidation effect caused by photochemical interactions and polymer degradation [1419] is clear.

363079.fig.005
Figure 5: ATR-FTIR spectra of untreated and treated PET fabric.
363079.fig.006
Figure 6: ATR-FTIR spectra of untreated and treated nylon fabric.

Figure 6 showed that the characteristic bands of the nylon fibers were observed at 3300 cm−1 with an overtone at 3080 cm−1 due to the stretching of hydrogen bonded to the N–H and the N–H bending. The CH2 symmetric and asymmetric stretching were found at 2930 and 2854 cm−1, associated at 720 cm−1 with the vibration of 4 or more –CH2 groups in the polymer chain. The band at 1634 cm−1 is associated with the C=O stretching and the 1535 cm−1 band is due to a combination of the bending N–H band and the stretching of the C–N [2025]. It is clear that the intensity of C=O and CO increased due to the UV/Ozone irradiation while the other characteristic groups were slightly degreased.

3.4. The Effect of Different UV/Ozone Treatment Times on the Values of the Dyed Synthetic Fabrics

Molecular oxygen was subjected to irradiation at 184.9 nm and 253.7 nm leading to absorption of hydrocarbons and the formation of ozone [26] and form active chemical sites. The products underwent UV/ozone excitation with atomic oxygen to form simpler, volatile molecules, which desorbed from the surfaces that has roughness at the nanoscales [13]. Therefore, when both wavelengths were present atomic oxygen was continuously generated and ozone was continually formed and then destroyed [2629].

Figures 7 and 8 show the effect of different UV/Ozone treatment times on the values of the two examined synthetic fabrics (polyester and nylon) dyed with saffron and curcumin dyes. As is evident, increasing the UV/Ozone treatment time (5, 20, 50, 110, and 120 min) brings about a noticeable increase in the value; this probably due to the diffusion of larger amount of dye into fabrics under study.

fig7
Figure 7: The values of polyester fabrics, (a) curcumin dye, (b) saffron dye.
fig8
Figure 8: The values of nylon fabrics, (a) curcumin dye, (b) saffron dye.

Increasing of the UV/ozone treated fabrics than untreated fabrics may be attributed to the fact that interaction of UV in presence of oxygen on the polymeric materials (polyester and nylon fabrics) produces many free radicals (P, POO, HOO, H, HO) as explained in Figure 9. Increase of values can be also be attributed to the affinity increase of dye molecules with the new functional groups generated during the treatment (C–O, C=O, COOH) but not in a radical state. These free radicals are responsible for making active sites for the attachment of treatment solutions (saffron or curcumin dye molecules) to the polyester and nylon fabrics.

363079.fig.009
Figure 9: Effect of UV/O3 radiation on polymeric materials.
3.5. The Effect of the UV/O3 Treatment on the Fastness Properties of the Synthetic Fabrics
3.5.1. Washing Fastness

The colour fastness to washing of the different examined dyed samples was determined according to standard methods (AATCC, 61-1975, 8-1977).

The results of washing fastness for all of the examined samples are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. These data showed that there was a slight effect of UV/O3 treatment in improving washing fastness. Washing fastness assessment of obtained colors on polyester and nylon fibers have shown good levels.

tab2
Table 2: Effect of exposure time on washing fastness of polyester dyed samples.
tab3
Table 3: Effect of exposure time on washing fastness of nylon dyed samples.
3.5.2. Light Fastness

The light fastness results are good and acceptable showing little fading of light shades in both the treated and untreated dyed nylon and polyester fabrics. The results of light fastness for all of the examined samples are summarized in Tables 4 and 5.

tab4
Table 4: Effect of exposure time on light fastness of polyester dyed samples.
tab5
Table 5: Effect of exposure time on light fastness of nylon dyed samples.

4. Conclusion

This work can conclude that treating nylon and polyester under study by UV/Ozone for different time ranged from 0 to 120 min increased the dyeability of both fabrics with curcumin and saffron natural dyes. Dyeability of both fabrics was measured according to colour strength () and fastness to washing and light fastness. Treatment with UV/ozone showed marked change of the surface chemical structure as shown by ATR-ATR-FTIR measurements in addition to the surface morphology as shown by SEM images.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Faculty of Applied Arts, Damietta University, and National Institute for Standards, Ministry of Scientific Research, for offering the facilities to conduct most of the experimental part of this study.

References

  1. M. P. Gashti, J. Willoughby, and P. Agrawal, “Surface and bulk modification of synthetic textiles to improve dyeability,” in Textile Dyeing, P. J. Hauser, Ed., chapter 13, InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  2. C. Silva and A. Cavaco-Paulo, “Biotransformations in synthetic fibres,” Biocatalysis and Biotransformation, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 350–356, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. A. Elmaaty, K. Elnagar, S. Hassan, and H. Gamal, “Antibacterial activity and dyeing characteristics of some azo-pyazole disperse dyes using eco-friendly ultrasound energy for PET fabric,” International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1156–1161, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  4. K. J. Lee, C. Kim, K. Ho, and K. Constant, “Improved surface wettability of polyurethane films by ultraviolet ozone treatment,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 118, no. 5, pp. 3024–3303, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. N. A. Elzaher and M. N. Micheal, “Time optimization of ultraviolet-ozone pretreatment for improving wool fabrics properties,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 1469–1476, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. K. Samanta and A. Konar, “Dyeing of textiles with natural dyes,” in Natural Dyes, E. P. A. Kumbasar, Ed., chapter 3, p. 132, InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. F. A. Nagia and R. S. EL-Mohamedy, “Dyeing of wool with natural anthraquinone dyes from Fusarium oxysporum,” Dyes and Pigments, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 550–555, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. F. Ibrahim, K. El-Nagar, and F. M. Tera, “Improving wool printability at reduced energy using UV/ozone treatment,” Research Journal of Textile and Apparel. In press.
  9. K. Elnagar, S. M. Reda, H. E. Ahmed, and S. Kamal, “Studying irradiation homogeneity in light aging for historical textile conservation,” Fibers and Polymers, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1581–1585, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Urbeen, S. Ali, T. Hussain, and R. Nawaz, “Dyeing properties of natural dyes extracted from turmeric and their comparison with reactive dyeing,” Research Journal of Textile and Apparel, vol. 12, no. 4, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  11. K. Sachan and V. P. Kapoor, “Optimization of extraction and dyeing conditions for traditional turmeric dye,” Indian Journal of traditional Knowledge, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 270–278, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  12. A. S. Raja, P. K. Pareek, D. B. Shakyawar, S. A. Wani, F. A. Nehvi, and A. H. Sofi, “Extraction of natural dye from Saffron flower waste and its application on pashmina fabric, Pelagia Research Library,” Advances in Applied Science Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 156–161, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  13. J. Jang and Y. Jeong, “Nano roughening of PET and PTT fabrics via continuous UV/O3 irradiation,” Dyes and Pigments, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 137–143, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. X. Song, H. Liu, L. Cheng, and Y. Qu, “Surface modification of coconut-based activated carbon by liquid-phase oxidation and its effects on lead ion adsorption,” Desalination, vol. 255, no. 1–3, pp. 78–83, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. L. Pavia, G. M. Lampman, and G. S. Kriz, Introduction to Spectroscopy, Thomson Business Information India Pvt., Bangalore, India, 3rd edition, 2006.
  16. V. Bajpai, A. Dey, S. Ghosh, S. Bajpai, and M. K. Jha, “Quantification of bacterial adherence on different textile fabrics,” International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1169–1174, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Li, M. Frey, and K. J. Browning, “Biodegradability study on cotton and polyester fabrics,” Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 42–53, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y. Zhang, Y. Su, J. Peng et al., “Composite nanofiltration membranes prepared by interfacial polymerization with natural material tannic acid and trimesoyl chloride,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 429, pp. 235–242, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Minhalma and M. N. de Pinho, “Tannic-membrane interactions on ultrafiltration of cork processing wastewaters,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 22-23, pp. 479–488, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Z. Wu, C. Zhou, R. Qi, and H. Zhang, “Synthesis and characterization of nylon 1012/clay nanocomposite,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 83, no. 11, pp. 2403–2410, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. G. Gholap, D. A. Musale, S. S. Kulkarni, S. K. Karode, and U. K. Kharul, “Protein and buffer transport through anionically grafted nylon membranes,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 183, no. 1, pp. 89–99, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. E. M. Enlow, J. L. Kennedy, A. A. Nieuwland, J. E. Hendrix, and S. L. Morgan, “Discrimination of nylon polymers using attenuated total reflection mid-infrared spectra and multivariate statistical techniques,” Applied Spectroscopy, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 986–992, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. Iwamoto and H. Murase, “Infrared spectroscopic study of the interactions of nylon-6 with water,” Journal of Polymer Science. Part B: Polymer Physics, vol. 41, no. 14, pp. 1722–1729, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. Stuart, Infrared Spectroscopy: Fundamentals and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
  25. A. A. Younis, M. A. Nour, and K. El-Nagar, “Studying the effect of phosphorylated sol-gel on polyester fabric as flame-retardant coating,” Applied Chemistry-Elixir International Journal, vol. 70, pp. 24230–24235, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  26. M. N. Michael and N. A. El-Zaher, “Invistigation into the effect of UV/ozone treatment on dyeing properties of natural fabrics,” Egyptian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 93–100, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  27. F. Fattahi, H. Izadan, and A. Khoddami, “Investigation into the effect of UV/Ozone irradiation on dyeing behaviour of poly(lactic acid) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) substrates,” Progress in Color, Colorants and Coatings, vol. 5, pp. 15–22, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  28. S. F. Ibrahim, Investigation into the effect of UV/ozone treatments on physical properties and dyeing kinetics of some polymeric fabrics [Ph.D. thesis], Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt, 2003.
  29. E. M. Osman, M. N. Michael, and H. Gohar, “the effect of both UV/Ozone and chitosan on natural fabrics,” International Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 28–39, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar