Table of Contents
Journal of Thermodynamics
Volume 2015, Article ID 268034, 11 pages
Research Article

Thermal-Hydraulics Study of a 75 kWth Aqueous Homogeneous Reactor for 99Mo Production

1Higher Institute of Technologies and Applied Sciences (InSTEC), Avenida Salvador Allende y Luaces, Quinta de Los Molinos, Plaza de la Revolución, 10400 Havana, Cuba
2Tecnología Nuclear Médica SpA (TNM), Latadia, Las Condes, 4250 Santiago, Chile
3Departamento de Energía Nuclear, Universidad Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Cidade Universitária, Avenida Professor Luiz Freire, 1000 Recife, PE, Brazil

Received 12 September 2015; Revised 24 November 2015; Accepted 2 December 2015

Academic Editor: Pedro Jorge Martins Coelho

Copyright © 2015 Daniel Milian Pérez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Report to the Nuclear Science Advisory Committee, Review of the NNSA GTRI Mo-99 Program, May 2014.
  2. P. Peykov and R. Cameron, “Medical isotope supply in the future: production capacity and demand forecast for the 99Mo/99mTc market, 2015–2020,” Tech. Rep., Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), 2014. View at Google Scholar
  3. A. Mushtaq, “Future of low specific activity molybdenum-99/technetium-99m generator,” Current Radiopharmaceuticals, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 325–328, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. IAEA, “Non-HEU production technologies for molybdenum-99 and technetium-99m,” IAEA Nuclear Energy Series no. NF-T-5.4, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  5. A. Isnaeni, M. S. Aljohani, T. G. Aboalfaraj, and S. I. Bhuiyan, “Analysis of 99Mo production capacity in uranyl nitrate aqueous homogeneous reactor using ORIGEN and MCNP,” Atom Indonesia, vol. 40, no. 1, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  6. IAEA, “Homogeneous aqueous solution nuclear reactors for the production of 99Mo and other short lived radio isotopes,” Tech. Rep. IAEA-TECDOC-1601, IAEA, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. J. Youker, S. D. Chemerisov, M. Kalensky, P. Tkac, D. L. Bowers, and G. F. Vandegrift, “A solution-based approach for Mo-99 production: considerations for nitrate versus sulfate media,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2013, Article ID 402570, 10 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. C. Pain, C. R. E. de Oliveira, A. J. H. Goddard, and A. P. Umpleby, “Non-linear space-dependent kinetics for the criticality assessment of fissile solutions,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 53–114, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Y. Li, H. Wu, L. Cao et al., “FMSR: a code system for in-core fuel management calculation of aqueous homogeneous solution reactor,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 240, no. 4, pp. 763–770, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. V. Myasnikov, A. K. Pavlov, N. V. Petrunin, and V. A. Pavshook, “Conversion of the ARGUS solution reactor to LEU fuel: results of feasibility studies and schedule,” in Proceedings of the 34th International Meeting on Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactors (RERTR '12), Warsaw, Poland, October 2012.
  11. P. P. Boldyrev, V. S. Golubev, S. V. Myasnikov, A. K. Pavlov, N. V. Petrunin, and V. A. Pavshook, “The Russian ARGUS solution reactor HEU-LEU conversion: LEU fuel preparation, loading and first criticality,” in Proceeding of 35th International Meeting on Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactors (RERTR '14), October 2014.
  12. Graphite-Reflected Uranyl Sulphate (20.9% 235U) Solutions, Volume III, IEU-SOL-THERM-001, NEA/NSC/DOC/(95)03, 1997.
  13. M. V. Huisman, Medical Isotope Production Reactor Reactor design for a small sized aqueous homogeneous reactor for producing molybdenum-99 for regional demand [Master Thesis in Applied Physics], Delft University of Technology, 2013.
  14. S. Rijnsdorp, Design of a small aqueous homogeneous reactor for production of 99Mo improving the reliability of the supply chain [M.S. thesis], Delft University of Technology, 2014.
  15. C. M. Cooling, Development of a point kinetics model with thermal hydraulic feedback of an aqueous homogeneous reactor for medical isotope production [Ph.D. thesis], Engineering in Nuclear Engineering of Imperial College London and the Diploma of Imperial College London, 2014.
  16. D. Milian, D. E. Milian, M. Cadavid, L. P. Rodriguez, and J. Salomón, “Feasibility neutronic conceptual design for the core configuration of a 75 kWth aqueous homogeneous reactor for 99Mo production,” in Proceeding of XV Workshop on Nuclear Physics and IX Symposium on Nuclear & Related Techniques, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  17. ANSYS CFX, release 14, Help System, Meshing User's Guide and CFX Documentation, ANSYS, Inc, 2011.
  18. A. J. Younker, D. C. Stepinski, L. Ling, and F. George, “Mo recovery updates and physical properties of uranyl sulfate solutions,” Tech. Rep. ANL/CSE-13/20 REV 1 109440, Report of the Argonne National Laboratory, Chemical Sciences and Engineering Division, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  19. S. Chemerisov, R. Gromov, V. Makarashvili et al., “Experimental setup for direct electron irradiation of the uranyl sulfate solution: bubble formation and thermal hydraulics studies,” in Proceedings of the Mo-99 Topical Meeting on Molybdenum-99 Technological Development, Washington, DC, USA, June 2014.
  20. D. Y. Chuvilin, J. D. Meister, S. S. Abalin et al., “An interleaved approach to production of 99Mo and 89Sr medical radioisotopes,” Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, vol. 257, no. 1, pp. 59–63, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. F. J. Souto and R. H. Kimpland, “Reactivity analysis of solution reactors for medical-radioisotope production,” Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research, Section B, vol. 213, pp. 369–372, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  22. D. R. Pitts and L. E. Sissom, Theory and Problems of Heat Transfer, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1997.
  23. E. Cao, Transferencia de Calor en Ingeniería de Procesos, 1st edition, 2004.
  24. F. P. Incropera and D. P. DeWitt, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 1996.
  25. D. Yu. Chuvilin, R. W. Brown, V. E. Khvostionov et al., “Experimental demonstration of the new tecnology of medical Sr-89 production in solution reactor,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Isotopes (ICI '05), Brussels, Belgium, April 2005.