Research Article
Utilization of Six Sigma in Quality Improvement of Recycled Aggregates Concrete
Table 11
Response optimization.
| Parameters | | Goal | Lower | Target | Upper | Weight | Import |
| Fc.avg | Maximum | 32.000 | 35.100 | 35.1 | 1 | 1 | Fc.stdv | Minimum | 1.921 | 1.921 | 2.5 | 1 | 1 | Global solution | | | | | | | % Coarse = 26.0101 | | | | | | | % Fine = 30.5556 | | | | | | | w/c ratio = 0.5 | | | | | | | Predicted responses | | | | | | | Fc.avg = 34.1753, desirability = 0.701712 | | | | | | | Fc.stdv = 2.0957, desirability = 0.698315 | | | | | | | Composite desirability = 0.700012 | | | | | | |
|
|