Lymphoma / 2012 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 904367 | 9 pages |

AIDS-Related Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Sub-Saharan Africa: Current Status and Realities of Therapeutic Approach

Academic Editor: Jan Delabie
Received24 Feb 2012
Revised30 Mar 2012
Accepted07 Jun 2012
Published12 Jul 2012


Today AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (AR-NHL) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients the world over, and especially in sub-Saharan Africa. While the overall incidence of AR-NHL since the emergence of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) era has declined, the occurrence of this disease appears to have stabilized. In regions where access to cART is challenging, the impact on disease incidence is less clear. In the resource-rich environment it is clinically recognized that it is no longer appropriate to consider AR-NHL as a single disease entity and rather treatment of AIDS lymphoma needs to be tailored to lymphoma subtype. While intensive therapeutic strategies in the resource-rich world are clearly improving outcome, in AIDS epicenters of the world and especially in sub-Saharan Africa there is a paucity of data on treatment and outcomes. In fact, only one prospective study of dose-modified oral chemotherapy and limited retrospective studies with sufficient details provide a window into the natural history and clinical management of this disease. The scarcities and challenges of treatment in this setting provide a backdrop to review the current status and realities of the therapeutic approach to AR-NHL in sub-Saharan Africa. More pragmatic and risk-adapted therapeutic approaches are needed.

1. Introduction

While the advent of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has had a dramatic effect on the clinical manifestations and progression of HIV disease, reduced the incidence of opportunistic infection(s) and AIDS-related malignancies, and improved overall survival in the resource-rich world, the impact of cART scale-up afforded through World Health Organization (WHO) global initiatives and the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) in improving access and patient monitoring is less apparent in resource challenged AIDS epicenters of the world and especially Africa [16]. The fact remains that the overwhelming majority of HIV-infected individuals in these resource challenged regions are either unaware of their underlying infection and/or go untreated. Thus, the burden of HIV infection and AIDS is greatest in the developing world (95%) with sub-Saharan Africa harboring essentially two-thirds of the world’s population of persons living with HIV/AIDS [7].

Cancer is now a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among individuals living with HIV and AIDS [2, 3, 812]. The risk of developing United States (US) Centers for Disease Control AIDS-defining malignancy in HIV-infected subjects is associated with the level of immunodeficiency, especially with Kaposi’s sarcoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL); the degree of immunosuppression is less apparent for cervical cancer [13, 14]. In the US, there is 77-fold increased risk of developing NHL including Burkitt’s lymphoma (BL), which is now the most commonly encountered AIDS-related malignancy and the most common cause of cancer mortality in AIDS patients; however, in Africa it remains the second most common malignant complication following Kaposi’s sarcoma [3, 8, 9]. Recent estimates in the US also confirm that 5.5% of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and 19.4% of BL cases occurred among persons with AIDS [13]. These lymphomas appear to be more common in males than in females, regardless of antiretroviral use, and there now appears to be a trimodal age-specific incidence pattern for BL in the US, with the middle-age peak largely composed of cases with AIDS [8, 15].

There are limited published reviews on the clinicopathological spectrum of lymphoproliferative diseases encountered in sub-Saharan Africa with or without the backdrop of underlying HIV infection and therapeutic outcome, including both prognostic and predictive indicators. Often these reviews focus more on the adoption of therapeutic approaches from the developed world that may or may not be suitable for the resource challenged setting in sub-Saharan Africa or report clinical experience in patients that are not HIV-infected [1619]. For instance, in a review from Cape Town, South Africa less than 2% of 512 consecutively treated lymphoma patients seen at a private sector academic center were HIV-infected [19].

Given this backdrop, it is the intent of our review to primarily focus on the clinicopathological presentation and treatment of AIDS-related non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (AR-NHL) in the resource-limited setting in sub-Saharan Africa. Our report highlights the current realities that the healthcare team is faced with in sub-Saharan Africa and does not recapitulate the data or therapeutic approach from the resource-rich setting. Many obstacles including the diagnosis and management of AR-NHL pose particular problems for clinicians who manage these patients [2025]. These challenges include often unreliable availability of cART, drugs for treatment of opportunistic infection, and poor access to traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs. The prospects for access to even newer agents in the therapeutic armamentarium for lymphoproliferative diseases such as rituximab (Rituxan) and ibritumomab (Zevalin)—CD20-directed monoclonal antibodies; bendamustine (Treanda)—a new alkylating agent; and brentuximab (Adcetris)—CD30-directed monoclonal antibody are nonexistent. Poor access to supportive therapy, which is required during myelotoxic chemotherapy, such as suitable antibiotic coverage, blood products, and colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) all of which are often scarce or nonexistent further complicates patient compliance with therapy, management of associated toxicities, and treatment outcomes especially unacceptably high treatment-related mortality rates when compared to the resource-rich setting. In addition to these, other factors relating to poor referral mechanisms of patients to healthcare facilities, other compliance issues attributable to poverty and ignorance, and late stage clinical presentation all add to the challenges in management of these patients.

2. The AIDS Epidemic, Antiretroviral; and Cancer Therapy in Sub-Saharan Africa

The UNAIDS program estimates that 22.5 million adults and children are living in sub-Saharan Africa with HIV infection/AIDS; the adult seroprevalence rate is on the order of 5%; and there are 1.3 million deaths annually attributable to HIV disease [7]. South Africa in particular is hardest hit with the largest epidemic of 5.6 million persons [7]. Estimates are that more than a third of HIV-infected individuals residing in sub-Saharan Africa are eligible for antiretroviral therapy receive appropriate cART and patient care. Roll-out of antiretroviral therapy coverage is no doubt improving with an approximate 20% increase in numbers of patients receiving cART in 2010 when compared to 2009 [7]. This, however, has yet to translate into meaningful decreases in the incidence of AIDS-associated malignant diseases.

Estimates regarding access to or coverage of cytotoxic chemotherapy in sub-Saharan Africa are largely unknown and not published. Access to radiation therapy on the continent is even more scarce; and ample pathology diagnostic capability is often very limited and/or nonexistent in some sub-Saharan African nations [26].

It was recognized early into the AIDS epidemic that the clinical course of AR-NHL was much more aggressive than patients without HIV infection. In general, AR-NHL is characterized by higher grade (40–60%), extranodal disease (80%), advanced clinical stage (60–70%) often presenting with B symptoms (i.e., unexplained, fever, night sweats, and weight loss in excess of 10% of normal body weight), and shortened survival (median 7-8 months) when compared with lymphomas in HIV-seronegative or indeterminate patients [21, 27, 28]. At time of clinical presentation prior to the cART era, the median CD4+ lymphocyte count was 100/μL. In the cART era, patients are less immune suppressed with median CD4+ lymphocyte counts ranging between 150–200/μL and higher. In sub-Saharan Africa, it has been recognized for sometime that patients with AIDS-related malignancies do not present with as profound immunosuppression as was observed earlier on in the epidemic in the US [2931]. It is not uncommon for patients with AIDS-related BL to present with signs and symptoms of tumor lysis syndrome. In addition, the incidence of leptomeningeal involvement at time of diagnosis of AR-NHL and over the course of disease appears to be declining as well. This could be attributable to the altered natural history of underlying HIV infection in the cART era and perhaps less predominance of high-grade histologies (off-set by increase in intermediate-grade large cell lymphoma) [21, 29]. Though high-grade histology, especially BL, and lymphomas that harbor EBV, with bone marrow or disease involvement that impinges on or near the CNS such as paranasal sinuses and paraspinal masses are more likely to have leptomeningeal involvement [21, 27, 32]. There remains a clear male predominance in AIDS lymphoma in the US but in other regions of the world most affected by the epidemic such as sub-Saharan Africa, there is nearly an equal distribution of cases in men and women. This is reflective of the predominant heterosexual transmission of HIV infection in Africa.

Recent studies in Uganda have included a case-control study of NHL (31 adult and 61 pediatrics cases identified between 1994–1998), and two others have reported the clinical characteristics and outcome of pediatric Burkitt’s lymphoma (228 cases identified between 1994–2004) and adult NHL (154 cases with sufficient records and excluding BL identified between 2004–2008) in the backdrop of HIV infection for the first time [3335]. In the case-control study, 92 cases had full phenotyping and documentation of EBV status, which were considered validated [33]. Burkitt’s lymphoma and large B-cell lymphomas represented 71% of adult cases and BL represented 92% of pediatric cases validated respectively [33]. EBV was present in 35% of the adult cases and 91% of pediatric cases. HIV infection was documented in 34% of adult cases versus 20% of controls and in 4.9% of pediatric patients versus 5% of controls [33]. In another study of children with BL, nearly one-third of cases were HIV-infected, the median age was 6.9 years, and over 60% were male [34]. HIV-infected children presented with more advanced stage, significant extrafacial (e.g., especially lymphadenopathy), and thoracic disease [34]. The recent large retrospective Ugandan study of 154 cases of NHL in which 32% were known to be HIV-seropositive underscored the impact of coadministration of cART at time of receiving chemotherapy for lymphoma with outcomes, though dismal, approaching those of HIV-seronegative or indeterminate cases [35]. Interestingly in this series, a third of cases were females; only 60% of cases had documentation of clinical staging and of these the majority (90%) presented with stage III or IV disease.

A Kenyan period prevalence study of adult BL in the backdrop of AIDS observed that the proportion of men (60%) was similar in HIV-seropositive versus seronegative cases; HIV-seropositive cases were significantly older at diagnosis (35 versus 19.5 years); and HIV-seropositive cases uniformly presented with B symptoms and advanced BL accompanied by diffuse lymph node involvement and extranodal presentations as well [36]. What was striking in this study was the complete sparing of peripheral lymph nodes in HIV-seronegative adult BL cases, which is reminiscent of the “typical” pattern of clinical presentation in endemic disease. It was concluded that inclusion of AIDS-related BL in the differential diagnosis of the adult patient with unexplained fever and lymphadenopathy, which is often associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and sexually transmitted diseases in Kenya and other parts of sub-Saharan Africa, warrants consideration. The corollary is that HIV infection is virtually excluded in an adult patient without peripheral lymphadenopathy and biopsy-proven BL [36].

4. Diagnosis and Staging

The diagnosis of AR-NHL is established by pathological confirmation of malignant lymphoma on biopsy material of involved lymph node(s), bone marrow, or other extranodal site(s) and should include immunohistochemistry for confirmation of CD20+ B-cell status of the tumor to guide selection of rituximab if this is available; in the majority of resource-limited settings in sub-Saharan Africa this agent is not available [37, 38]. In the resource challenged setting diagnosis of BL is often made on fine needle aspiration of peripheral lesions alone and this can present inherent challenges in assurance of diagnosis [39, 40]. Heightened clinical suspicion upon careful history taking for underlying risk behaviors for acquisition of HIV infection and physical examination for clinical signs and stigmata of HIV disease are critical to properly diagnose and sort out any association of HIV infection and malignant lymphoma. Routine HIV antibody testing is performed in patients with newly diagnosed NHL.

Regardless of setting, patients with AR-NHL are best staged according to the Ann Arbor staging criteria, which is adopted as an international staging classification scheme for NHL [41]. In sub-Saharan Africa clinical staging builds upon careful history and physical examination and incorporates laboratory investigations (including complete blood cell count and differential; serum electrolytes and chemistries, including lactate dehydrogenase where feasible with particular attention to metabolic parameters that are indicative of tumor lysis syndrome); bone marrow aspiration and biopsy; and examination of the cerebrospinal fluid for cytology. In most settings, radiographic studies will be limited to chest radiography and abdominal sonography. Echocardiography is available and usually obtained given the likely use of doxorubicin or other anthracycline-containing combination chemotherapy regimen. Lastly, assessment of HIV infection includes HIV serology, baseline determinations of CD4+ lymphocyte counts, and HIV-1 plasma RNA levels (i.e., viral load).

It is important to specifically comment that reliance on physical examination is all the more important in sub-Saharan Africa given the relative lack of computed tomography (available in some instances), magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography (which are generally unavailable) [21, 25, 29]. Although under-staging of patients when compared to western and more resource-rich settings is likely this is, however, balanced by initial presentation at more advanced stages of disease than occurs in developed countries [29]. In this setting, physical examination becomes a reasonable and reliable instrument of assessment. In most situations this is further complemented with accompanying chest radiography, abdominal ultrasonography, bone marrow aspiration biopsy, and cerebrospinal fluid cytology [29].

It is important to comment on the evolution of treatment of AR-NHL in the US or resource-rich setting to put into context the current therapeutic approach in resource-limited sub-Saharan Africa. At the outset of the AIDS epidemic it was readily apparent that patients did not tolerate more aggressive or dose-intensive systemic therapy despite presenting with high-grade tumors including AIDS-associated BL and more advanced stage of disease when compared to HIV-seronegative or indeterminate cases of NHL; all patients were generally treated in a similar manner regardless of histologic subtype; and prognosis was most dependent on the degree of immunosuppression with patients having demonstrably poorer outcomes with CD4+ lymphocyte counts <100/μL [21, 27, 28, 4244]. Thus, initial approaches incorporated dose-modified chemotherapeutic strategies, which over the first 15 years of the epidemic proved equally efficacious and markedly less toxic, especially with diminished myelotoxicity [45, 46]. It was also recognized that infusional versus bolus chemotherapy strategies (e.g., CDE-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and etoposide or EPOCH-etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin) yielded better complete response (CR) rates and survival outcomes, though not in randomized or comparative clinical trials [47, 48]. What is also intriguing by the published experience with infusional EPOCH regimen was the strategy of suspension of antiretroviral therapy over the course of chemotherapy to avoid increased risk of drug-drug interactions, potential for increased toxicity, and to enhance overall patient compliance, all of which are appropriate considerations in sub-Saharan Africa [47]. The chemotherapy was also dose-adjusted on the basis of CD4+ lymphocyte count in an attempt to individualize therapy. While this strategy (to suspend antiretroviral therapy) did not result in adverse clinical outcome (i.e., HIV-1 viral load and CD4+ lymphocyte counts returned to baseline by 3 and 12 months, resp.), it should be carefully considered and requires larger, multi-center clinical trial(s) to firmly establish this approach.

The role of rituximab has also been well established in HIV-infected patients with CD20+ B-cell lymphomas despite initial observations (the addition of rituximab to standard-dose CHOP led to increased infectious complications and deaths attributable to sepsis) reported by the NCI-sponsored AIDS Malignancy Consortium (AMC 010 study) [49]. Confirmatory studies conducted by the AMC and others have proven the safety of adding rituximab to cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens for AR-NHL, including cases of BL and BL-like subytpes [27, 50]. Only recently, however, has it been recognized that in the cART era that indeed outcomes are different between subtypes of AIDS lymphoma and that patients with higher grade tumors, and BL in particular, do much worse and need to be treated with more aggressive systemic chemotherapy regimens [51]. It is no longer appropriate to treat all cases of AR-NHL as constituting a single disease entity and into “one therapeutic basket” but rather lymphoma-specific features, especially tumor grade and likely other molecular markers (e.g., CD20+ and IRF4/MUM1-positive immunohistochemistry) need to guide the selection of chemotherapeutic regimens. In the not-too-distant future viral therapeutic targets will likely emerge in the clinic as well [52].

There is scant published data on therapy and clinical outcomes of AR-NHL in sub-Saharan Africa [22, 23]. Table 1 presents clinical data from sub-Saharan Africa in a hierarchal perspective—based on strength of evidence and clinical data from select US clinical trials is summarized for additional insight and comparative purposes [19, 29, 3436, 4549, 53]. There is a single prospective clinical trial of dose-modified oral chemotherapy from Kenya and Uganda, and we have selected 4 of the largest retrospective studies that have been published. In the majority of instances, isolated case series or small retrospective studies of AR-NHL in Africa seldom report detailed information on types of chemotherapy administered, safety or toxicity information, and clinical outcomes such as response rates and survival; often data that is published is limited to the clinical presentation and features of disease [22]. On the other hand, published reports of chemotherapy trials in children with endemic BL have emerged, are informative, and have clearly identified the challenges in administering dose-intense chemotherapy in other clinical settings in sub-Saharan Africa [e.g., Malawi and International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) network], where 1-year event-free survival is 57% and treatment related mortality is on the order of 30%, which contrasts with at 90% 1-year EFS rate in Europe and markedly diminished treatment related mortality attributable to the requisite supportive care in the resource-rich environment to sustain children through prolonged periods of dose-intense myelosuppression [5456]. This experience in children, perhaps more than any other, substantiates the challenges of administering myelosuppressive chemotherapy in settings where resources are scarce and readily translates into the clinical management of patients with AR-NHL. Treatment mortality rates in other disease settings but especially BL, when published, have ranged between 20–66% in other studies, which is unacceptable in the resource-rich setting [22].

Regimen (Study/Year) [Reference]Nos. Pts.ORR (CR/PR)SurvivalComment(s)

(A) Sub-Saharan Africa Data—Prospective trial (1) and key retrospective studies

Dose-modified oral chemo. (CWRU 2498/2009) [29]4978% (CR 58%/PR 20%)MST 12.3 mos.
(33% 1-yr)
Only published prospective treatment trial of AR-NHL in sub-Saharan Africa; conducted comparable HIV therapeutic era as ACTG 142 trial [45]; 6% treatment mortality rate.
Uganda Cancer Institute (NHL study/2011) [35]154
(32% HIV+)
No response data provided or types of chemotherapy.MST 61 days (13% 1-yr)Largest retrospective study on NHL including HIV(−) and HIV(+) cases ever reported with treatment and outcome data. Only 60% had acceptable clinical staging.
Stellenbosch University (NHL study/2010) [19]512
(4 HIV+)
Overall CR range 46–75% for all subtypes; chemotherapy regimens not reported.MST 10 mos. (50% 1-yr)Comprehensive retrospective study of spectrum lymphoproliferative disorders at a major private referral centre in Cape Town. Only 4 cases (<1%) were HIV(+). MST is for the 4 AR-NHL cases.
Uganda Cancer Institute (Pediatric BL study/2009) [34]228
(31% HIV+)
36% CR HIV(+)
41% CR HIV(−)
MST 11.8 mos. HIV(+) Not reached HIV(−)Comprehensive and largest retrospective study of pediatric BL in sub-Saharan Africa. No details on types of chemotherapy administered.
University of Nairobi (BL study/2001) [36]796
with 29 adult BL
(66% HIV+)
No response data reported or types of chemotherapy.MST 15 wks.Among earliest period prevalence and retrospective study that identified 3-fold increase in adult BL cases in the AIDS era. MST is for HIV(+) BL.

(B) United States Data—Select clinical trials

Concurrent R-EPOCH versus sequential R-EPOCH (AMC 034/2010 ) [53]48 concurrent
53 sequential
73% CR concurrent 55% CR sequential2-yr OS 70% concurrent versus 67% sequentialRandomized phase II trial of concurrent versus sequential rituximab with EPOCH chemotherapy; the primary efficacy endpoint of CR achieved only for the concurrent arm.
R-CHOP versus CHOP (AMC 010/2005) [49]15058% CR R-CHOP
139 wks. OS R-CHOP 110 wks. OS CHOPRandomized trial among first to use rituximab; raised concern with higher infectious deaths on R-CHOP arm; not substantiated in future trials with rituximab.
Infusional CDE (ECOG E1494/2004) [48]9845% CR2-yr OS 43%Among largest studies of a highly active infusional regimen conducted during emergence of cART era.
Infusional EPOCH (NCI/2003) [47]3974% CR63% OS at 53 mos.Dose-adjusted (on basis of CD4+ lymphocyte count) chemotherapy regimen with interruption of cART amongst highest CR and survival reported at time.
LD and SD CHOP (AMC 005/2001) [46]40 LD
23 SD
30% CR LD
48% CR SD
Not reportedNot randomized; 2 consecutive treatment arms established feasibility of concurrent chemotherapy with cART. Median duration of response 9 mos. LD; not reached for SD CHOP.
LD versus SD m-BACOD (ACTG 142/1997) [45]98 LD
94 SD
41% CR LD
52% CR SD
35 wks. LD
31 wks. SD
Largest randomized clinical trial in AR-NHL ever conducted; established equivalence of LD versus SD in pre-cART era.

Given this backdrop, in 2009 the first prospective clinical trial of AR-NHL was reported from Kenya and Uganda utilizing a dose-modified oral chemotherapy regimen [29]. It was hypothesized that dose-modified oral chemotherapy using a regimen that had demonstrable activity in AR-NHL in the pre-cART era in the US would be efficacious and enhance the therapeutic index [50, 5759]. Rationale for the 4-drug combination (lomustine-etoposide-cyclophosphamide-procarbazine) has been published [57]. What is especially notable is the absence of anthracyclines and hence the avoidance of cardiotoxicity and the presence of agents that cross the blood-brain barrier (lomustine and procarbazine). Corticosteroids were also omitted because of additional immunosuppressive effects and potential tumor growth promoting effects in patients with Kaposi’s sarcoma (both endemic and AIDS-related disease) in a region of the world with the highest prevalence and incidence of KSHV infection. Published studies confirmed that dose modification of chemotherapy lessened myelotoxicity without compromising efficacy in the pre-cART era in the US, which provided the departure point to dose modify the oral regimen in sub-Saharan Africa [45, 46].

Important outcomes in 49 patients treated on this trial included overall objective response rate of 78%, median event-free and overall survival times of 7.9 months (95% CI, 3.3 to 13.0 months) and 12.3 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 32.4 months) respectively; and 33% of patients survived 5 years [29]. The regimen was well tolerated, had modest effects (decline) on CD4+ lymphocyte counts ( ) and had negligible effects on HIV-1 viral replication. Four episodes of febrile neutropenia (5% of cycles) and three treatment-related deaths (6% mortality rate) occurred. Importantly, there was demonstrable activity in patients with high-grade tumors including 3 cases of verified AIDS-related BL with survivals of 7.2, 12.3 and 14.8 months [29]. It was concluded that dose-modified oral chemotherapy is efficacious, has comparable outcome to that in the US in the pre-cART setting (see data ACTG 142 trial summarized in Table 1) [45], has an acceptable safety profile, and subsequent studies should focus on strategies to optimize combination antiretroviral therapy and chemotherapy and follow-up tissue diagnostic and correlative studies. The NCI-sponsored AIDS Malignancy Consortium is developing a successor trial (AMC 068 protocol in development) of exploring both CHOP combination chemotherapy and dose-modified oral regimen in sub-Saharan Africa (in Eldoret, Kenya; Harare, Zimbabwe; Johannesburg, South Africa; and Kampala, Uganda) in which all patients will be treated with cART and the oral chemotherapy will be extended from a total course of 12 to 18 weeks (total of three cycles of therapy instead of two as in the original study).

The most thorough and detailed retrospective study reporting clinical outcomes of NHL was published in 2011 also from Uganda [35]. In this study, the median survival of patients presenting with NHL in whom mortality status was confirmed was 61 days; of these 32% were HIV-seropositive; and median survival among patients with HIV infection receiving antiretroviral therapy was comparable to those without HIV infection [35]. In the majority of instances these patients were treated with standard CHOP combination chemotherapy and dose-adjusted CHOP based on CD4+ lymphocyte count (<200 cells/μL) in HIV-infected patients [35]. It is also important to point out in this study that only 60% of patients were thoroughly clinically staged and there was an enormous rate of loss to follow-up, which highlights the limitations of retrospective studies. Another Uganda study of pediatric BL reported that while treatment response rates (≤70%) were similar regardless of HIV-serostatus, median survival (11.79 months) in HIV-infected children was less than HIV-negative/indeterminate children (median survival not reached in these children) [34]. In this report, no details were reported on the types of chemotherapy administered to these children.

Two large retrospective lymphoma studies, one from South Africa and another from Kenya, identified the outcomes of small subsets of HIV-infected patients. A study from a large, private regional university health center in Cape Town reported median survival duration of 10 months in 4 patients with AR-NHL from among 512 patients [19]. In a study from Nairobi of 796 patients with BL; 29 cases of adult BL were identified and two-thirds of these cases were HIV-infected; and, the median survival was 15 weeks [36]. No details were reported on the types of chemotherapy that was administered in either of these studies.

7. Departure Point for the Treatment of AR-NHL in Sub-Saharan Africa Based on Current Realities

Inherent challenges remain in the administration of chemotherapy, supportive care, and follow-up of patients with AR-NHL in sub-Saharan Africa as discussed herein and in more detail elsewhere [2126, 35, 60]. Table 2 provides a formulary of anticancer agents that are “generally” available in resource limited settings in sub-Saharan Africa. It cannot be overstated that supply of these agents is highly variable and can be interrupted for significant periods of time, which clearly impacts patient follow-up and translates into poor outcomes. Importantly, treatment of AR-NHL has evolved coincident with improvement in antiretroviral therapy. Scale-up of cART in these resource scarce settings will likely have the greatest impact when combined with currently available cytotoxic chemotherapy. There is clear evidence from retrospective and emerging prospective studies that access to cART improves outcomes in patients with AR-NHL.

CytarabineNitrogen mustard*
Gemcitabine**Colony-stimulating factors (CSFs)***

With this backdrop, in the sub-Saharan Africa CHOP combination chemotherapy (dose-modified in likely majority of instances especially in patients with CD4+ lymphocyte counts <100 cells/μL or slightly higher) likely represents a standard for patients with AR-NHL based on data from the research-rich world. Extreme caution is advised, however, following the report of retrospective data from Uganda in which the median survival was only 61 days; the majority of these patients received full-dose CHOP and many required dose interruption, dose reduction, and could not complete therapy [35]. Simply stated, there is no published prospective data on the use of combination CHOP chemotherapy in this setting for patients with AR-NHL. Given this reality, efforts to secure assurance of diagnosis; approaches to exploring oral chemotherapy administration, which undoubtedly consumes less resources and manpower; and dose-modification of cytotoxic agents appears prudent in resource-limited settings in Africa. It may also be clinically prudent to initiate antiretroviral therapy for patients once stabilized after their first course of chemotherapy if they are indeed cART naïve at time of AR-NHL diagnosis to limit potential risks of noncompliance with oral cART regimens and the nausea, vomiting seen with chemotherapy and the inherent debility of patients at time of presentation especially those with lymphomatous involvement of the gastrointestinal tract.

8. Summary and Ways Forward

In sub-Saharan Africa, in particular, and other developing countries, which bear the greatest burden of AR-NHL, challenges still abound and concerted efforts need to be made to improve patient care in this setting. Clinical research should be prioritized so as to determine the best way to manage this disease by improving diagnostic capability, identifying pragmatic, and better risk-adapted approaches for treatment. Physical examination at time of presentation of patients is an important instrument of measure and disease assessment in this setting. Clinical trials that emerge need to fundamentally improve treatment outcomes that are meaningful to this setting. These treatment trials must be immediately translatable with acceptable safety profiles, costs, and readily adaptable (i.e., any treatment approach cannot overwhelm the healthcare team in terms of its administration) to an environment of often extreme scarcity. The oral chemotherapy regimen reported herein is an excellent departure point for these therapeutic principles in this setting. At the same time there are unprecedented opportunities for translational research to interrogate viral oncogenic pathways given the inherent increased rates of co-infection with viral pathogens such as HIV, EBV, and KSHV among others so unique in this part of the world. This may yield innovative viral-targeted therapeutic strategies and new insights into prevention efforts of AIDS-associated and other viral tumors in this setting altogether.


P. M. Mwamba, W. O. Mwanda, and S. C. Remick are supported in part by NIH grant no.: D43 CA153707. N. W. Busakhala and R. M. Strother are supported in part by NIH grant no.: CA121947.


  1. S. Grabar, V. Le Moing, C. Goujard et al., “Clinical outcome of patients with HIV-1 infection according to immunologic and virologic response after 6 months of highly active antiretroviral therapy,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 133, no. 6, pp. 401–I16, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  2. E. A. Engels, R. J. Biggar, H. I. Hall et al., “Cancer risk in people infected with human immunodeficiency virus in the United States,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 187–194, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. E. Grulich, M. T. van Leeuwen, M. O. Falster, and C. M. Vajdic, “Incidence of cancers in people with HIV/AIDS compared with immunosuppressed transplant recipients: a meta-analysis,” Lancet, vol. 370, no. 9581, pp. 59–67, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Diamond, T. H. Taylor, T. Im, M. Miradi, and H. Anton-Culver, “Improved survival and chemotherapy response among patients with AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy,” Hematological Oncology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 139–145, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. C. Diamond, T. H. Taylor, and H. Anton-Culver, “Quality of life, characteristics and survival of patients with HIV and lymphoma,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 149–155, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Bower, C. Palmieri, and T. Dhillon, “AIDS-related malignancies: changing epidemiology and the impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 14–19, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  7. UNAIDS, “Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic,” 2010, View at: Google Scholar
  8. M. S. Shiels, R. M. Pfeiffer, M. H. Gail et al., “Cancer burden in the HIV-infected population in the United States,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 103, no. 9, pp. 753–762, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. J. Achenbach, S. R. Cole, M. M. Kitahata et al., “Mortality after cancer diagnosis in HIV-infected individuals treated with antiretroviral therapy,” AIDS, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 691–700, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. N. F. Crum, R. H. Riffenburgh, S. Wegner et al., “Comparisons of causes of death and mortality rates among HIV-infected persons: analysis of the pre-, early, and late HAART (Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy) eras,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 194–200, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. F. J. Palella, R. K. Baker, A. C. Moorman et al., “Mortality in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era: changing causes of death and disease in the HIV outpatient study,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. B. Hasse, B. Ledergerber, H. Furrer et al., “Morbidity and aging in HIV-infected persons: the Swiss HIV cohort study,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 1130–1139, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. S. Shiels, R. M. Pfeiffer, H. I. Hall et al., “Proportions of kaposi sarcoma, selected non-hodgkin lymphomas, and cervical cancer in the United States occurring in persons with AIDS, 1980–2007,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 305, no. 14, pp. 1450–1459, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Frisch, R. J. Biggar, E. A. Engels, and J. J. Goedert, “Association of cancer with AIDS-related immunosuppression in adults,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 285, no. 13, pp. 1736–1745, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  15. S. M. Mbulaiteye, W. F. Anderson, K. Bhatia, P. S. Rosenberg, M. S. Linet, and S. S. Devesa, “Trimodal age-specific incidence patterns for Burkitt lymphoma in the United States, 1973–2005,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 126, no. 7, pp. 1732–1739, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. F. Sitas, R. Pacella-Norman, H. Carrara et al., “The spectrum of HIV-1 related cancers in South Africa,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 489–492, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  17. G. Sissolak, E. A. Abayomi, and P. Jacobs, “AIDS defining lymphomas in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)—an African perspective,” Transfusion and Apheresis Science, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 63–70, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. J. Sasco, A. Jaquet, E. Boidin et al., “The challenge of AIDS-related malignancies in sub-Saharan Africa,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 1, Article ID e8621, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. G. Sissolak, J. Juritz, D. Sissolak, L. Wood, and P. Jacobs, “Lymphoma—emerging realities in sub-Saharan Africa,” Transfusion and Apheresis Science, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 141–150, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. B. N'Galy, S. Bertozzi, and R. W. Ryder, “Obstacles to the optimal management of HIV infection/AIDS in Africa,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 430–437, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  21. W. O. Mwanda, C. Banura, E. Katongole-Mbidde et al., “Therapeutic challenges of AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the United States and East Africa,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 94, no. 10, pp. 718–732, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  22. J. Orem, M. W. Otieno, and S. C. Remick, “AIDS-associated cancer in developing nations,” Current Opinion in Oncology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 468–476, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. Orem, M. W. Otieno, and S. C. Remick, “Challenges and opportunities for treatment and research of AIDS-related malignancies in Africa,” Current Opinion in Oncology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 479–486, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. Orem, W. O. Mwanda, C. Banura et al., “Capacity building for the clinical investigation of AIDS malignancy in East Africa,” Cancer Detection and Prevention, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 133–145, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. S. E. Krown, “Cancer in resource-limited settings,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 297–299, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. W. Wakabi, “Kenya and Uganda grapple with Burkitt lymphoma,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 319, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  27. R. Yarchoan, T. S. Uldrick, and R. F. Little, “AIDS-associated lymphomas,” in Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology, pp. 2099–2112, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 9th edition, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  28. J. L. Ziegler, J. A. Beckstead, and P. A. Volberding, “Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in 90 homosexual men. Relation to generalized lymphadenopathy and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 311, no. 9, pp. 565–570, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  29. W. O. Mwanda, J. Orem, P. Fu et al., “Dose-modified oral chemotherapy in the treatment of AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in East Africa,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 27, no. 21, pp. 3480–3488, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. T. Boerma, A. J. Nunn, and J. A. G. Whitworth, “Mortality impact of the AIDS epidemic: evidence from community studies in less developed countries,” AIDS, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. S3–S14, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  31. S. M. Mbulaiteye, D. M. Parkin, and C. S. Rabkin, “Epidemiology of AIDS-related malignancies an international perspective,” Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 673–696, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  32. A. Cingolani, R. Gastaldi, L. Fassone et al., “Epstein-Barr virus infection is predictive of CNS involvement in systemic AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphomas,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 18, no. 19, pp. 3325–3330, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  33. D. M. Parkin, H. Garcia-Giannoli, M. Raphael et al., “Non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Uganda: a case-control study,” AIDS, vol. 14, no. 18, pp. 2929–2936, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. Orem, A. Maganda, E. K. Mbidde, and E. Weiderpass, “Clinical characteristics and outcome of children with burkitt lymphoma in uganda according to HIV infection,” Pediatric Blood and Cancer, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 455–458, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. H. Bateganya, J. Stanaway, P. E. Brentlinger et al., “Predictors of survival after a diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in a resource-limited setting: a retrospective study on the impact of HIV infection and its treatment,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 312–319, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. W. O. Mwanda, S. C. Remick, and C. Whalen, “Adult Burkitt’s lymphoma in patients with and without human immunodeficiency virus infection in Africa,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 92, pp. 687–691, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  37. B. Coiffier, E. Lepage, J. Brière et al., “Chop chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with chop alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 346, no. 4, pp. 235–242, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. G. Lenz, G. Wright, S. S. Dave, W. Xiao, J. Powell, and H. Zhao, “Stromal gene signatures in large-B-cell lymphomas,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 359, pp. 2313–2323, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  39. M. Hummel, S. Bentink, H. Berger et al., “A biologic definition of Burkitt's lymphoma from transcriptional and genomic profiling,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 354, no. 23, pp. 2419–2430, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. S. Dave, K. Fu, G. W. Wright, L. T. Lam, P. Kluin, and E. J. Boerma, “Molecular diagnosis of Burkitt’s lymphoma,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 354, pp. 2431–2442, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  41. P. P. Carbone, H. S. Kaplan, K. Musshoff, D. W. Smithers, and M. Tubiana, “Report of the committee on Hodgkin's disease staging classification,” Cancer Research, vol. 49, pp. 2112–2135, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  42. J. Stebbing, V. Marvin, and M. Bower, “The evidence-based treatment of AIDS-related Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma,” Cancer Treatment Reviews, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 249–253, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. T. Lim and A. M. Levine, “Recent advances in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related lymphoma,” CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 229–241, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  44. N. Mounier, M. Spina, and C. Gisselbrecht, “Modern management of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in HIV-infected patients,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 136, no. 5, pp. 685–698, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. L. D. Kaplan, D. J. Straus, M. A. Testa et al., “Low-dose compared with standard-dose m-BACOD chemotherapy for non- Hodgkin's lymphoma associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 336, no. 23, pp. 1641–1648, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. L. Ratner, J. Lee, S. Tang et al., “Chemotherapy for human immunodeficiency virus-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in combination with highly active antiretroviral therapy,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 2171–2178, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  47. R. F. Little, S. Pittaluga, N. Grant et al., “Highly effective treatment of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related lymphoma with dose-adjusted EPOCH: impact of antiretroviral therapy suspension and tumor biology,” Blood, vol. 101, no. 12, pp. 4653–4659, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  48. J. A. Sparano, S. Lee, M. G. Chen et al., “Phase II trial of infusional cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial (E1494),” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1491–1500, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. L. D. Kaplan, J. Y. Lee, R. F. Ambinder et al., “Rituximab does not improve clinical outcome in a randomized phase 3 trial of CHOP with or without rituximab in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin lymphoma: AIDS-Malignancies Consortium Trial 010,” Blood, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 1538–1543, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. J. Orem, P. Fu, A. Ness, W. O. Mwanda, and S. C. Remick, “Oral combination chemotherapy in the treatment of AIDS-associated Hodgkin's disease,” East African Medical Journal, vol. 82, no. 9, pp. S144–S149, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  51. S. T. Lim, R. Karim, B. N. Nathwani, A. Tulpule, B. Espina, and A. M. Levine, “AIDS-related Burkitt's lymphoma versus diffuse large-cell lymphoma in the pre-highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and HAART eras: significant differences in survival with standard chemotherapy,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 23, no. 19, pp. 4430–4438, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. A. Noy, L. Kaplan, J. Lee, E. Cesarman, and W. Tam, “Modified dose intensive R-CODOX-M/IVAC for HIV-associated Burkitt (BL) (AMC 048) shows efficacy and tolerability, and predictive potential of IRF4/MUM1 expression,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Malignancies in AIDS and Other Acquired Immunodeficiencies, abstract 014, p. 38, Bethesda, Md, USA, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  53. J. A. Sparano, J. Y. Lee, L. D. Kaplan et al., “Rituximab plus concurrent infusional EPOCH chemotherapy is highly effective in HIV-associated B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma,” Blood, vol. 115, no. 15, pp. 3008–3016, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. P. B. Hesseling, R. Broadhead, E. Molyneux et al., “Malawi pilot study of burkitt lymphoma treatment,” Medical and Pediatric Oncology, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 532–540, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. P. Hesseling, R. Broadhead, E. Mansvelt et al., “The 2000 burkitt lymphoma trial in Malawi,” Pediatric Blood and Cancer, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 245–250, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. P. B. Hesseling, E. Molyneux, F. Tchintseme et al., “Treating Burkitt's lymphoma in Malawi, Cameroon, and Ghana,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 512–513, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. S. C. Remick, J. J. McSharry, B. C. Wolf et al., “Novel oral combination chemotherapy in the treatment of intermediate- grade and high-grade AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1691–1702, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  58. S. C. Remick, N. Sedransk, R. Haase et al., “Oral combination chemotherapy in the management of AIDS-related lymphoproliferative malignancies,” Drugs, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 99–107, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  59. S. C. Remick, N. Sedransk, R. F. Haase et al., “Oral combination chemotherapy in conjunction with filgrastim (G-CSF) in the treatment of AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: evaluation of the role of G-CSF; Quality-of-life analysis and long-term follow-up,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 178–188, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. R. J. Lingwood, P. Boyle, A. Milburn et al., “The challenge of cancer control in Africa,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 398–403, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Peter M. Mwamba et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

1486 Views | 528 Downloads | 11 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.