Physics Research International

Physics Research International / 2010 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 493478 |

F. Santandrea, "Selective Excitations of Transverse Vibrational Modes of a Carbon Nanotube through a “Shuttle-Like” Electromechanical Instability", Physics Research International, vol. 2010, Article ID 493478, 5 pages, 2010.

Selective Excitations of Transverse Vibrational Modes of a Carbon Nanotube through a “Shuttle-Like” Electromechanical Instability

Academic Editor: Slava V. Rotkin
Received28 Sep 2009
Accepted03 Dec 2009
Published09 Feb 2010


We study the dynamics of transverse oscillations of a suspended carbon nanotube into which electron current is injected from the tip of a scanning tunneling microscope (STM). In this case the correlations between the displacement of the nanotube and its charge state, determined by the position-dependent electron tunneling rate, can lead to a “shuttle-like” instability for the transverse vibrational modes. We find that selective excitation of a specific mode can be achieved by an accurate positioning of the STM tip. This result suggests a feasible way to control the dynamics of this nano-electromechanical system (NEMS) based on the “shuttle instability.”

There are several reasons for the considerable current interest in nano-electromechanical systems (NEMSs), both for technological applications and fundamental research. The peculiar combination of several features such as high vibrational frequencies and small masses which characterize most NEMS makes these systems very suitable for the realization of new measurement tools with extremely high sensitivity in mass sensing and force microscopy applications [1, 2]. Furthermore, the mechanical elements of the NEMS (typically cantilevers or beams) are considered the most promising structures where quantum features of motion could be experimentally detected [3].

The physical basis for many of the interesting functionalities of NEMS is the strong interplay between mechanical and electronic degrees of freedom [48]. In the particular case of a nano-electromechanical single-electron transistor device having a metallic dot as movable part, the equilibrium position of the dot can become unstable as a consequence of the electromechanical coupling. In this case the dominant mechanism for the transport of charge is based on the oscillations of the dot which can “shuttle” the tunneling electrons across the system [9, 10].

The typical setup for many NEMS includes a spatially extended movable element such as a suspended carbon nanotube, whose dynamics has been demonstrated to be characterized by a number of different vibrational modes [11]. The relevance of many mechanical modes in the transport of charge suggests that the variety of effects due to the electromechanical coupling in suspended carbon nanotube-based NEMS may be even richer than in the ordinary “shuttle” system. Jonsson et al. have shown [1214] that if extra charge is injected into the movable part of the device from the tip of a scanning tunneling microscope (STM) a nano-electromechanical “shuttle-like” instability can be induced for the transverse vibrational modes of the nanotube.

The selective promotion of the electromechanical instability for different vibrational modes provides an interesting perspective for probing the dynamics of NEMS. Here we show that such selective excitation can be achieved by means of local injection of electric charge. The main idea is to optimize the electromechanical coupling for the mode(s) which we want to make unstable. The local character of the electric charge injection makes the selective excitation of the nanotube transverse modes possible by varying the position of the STM tip.

We will consider here the same device analyzed by Jonsson et al. since it provides a convenient set-up to control the electromechanical coupling of different vibrational modes. The system is sketched in Figure 1 and it consists of a metallic carbon nanotube suspended over the trench between two electrodes and an STM whose tip is positioned above a certain point along the nanotube axis. A bias voltage 𝑉𝑏 is applied between the STM tip and the supporting leads (which are both mantained at the same electrochemical potential) so that electrons can tunnel from the STM tip to the leads across the suspended carbon nanotube.

We take the 𝑧-axis along the nanotube axis, while its cross-section lies in the 𝑥𝑦 plane. The STM tip is put over point (0,0,𝑧0) and its distance from the nanotube at equilibrium is 𝑑1 nm.

In order to describe the motion of the nanotube we model it as a classical elastic beam of length 𝐿 clamped at both ends and focus on its flexural vibrations.

The motion of the nanotube in the 𝑥𝑧 plane can be described through 𝑢(𝑧,𝑡), its displacement along the 𝑥 axis from the static equilibrium configuration. If the amplitude of the oscillations is small enough for linear elasticity theory to be valid, the time evolution of 𝑢(𝑧,𝑡) is determined by the following equation [15]:


In (1), 𝜌 is the carbon nanotube density, 𝑆 the cross section, 𝐸 the Young modulus, 𝐼 the cross section moment of inertia, 𝑞(𝑡) the extra charge on the nanotube at time 𝑡, and 𝐹𝑥𝑒𝑙 the 𝑥 component of the external force (per unit length) generated by the electrostatic interaction between the STM tip and the nanotube.

The precise spatial distribution of 𝐹𝑥𝑒𝑙 depends on the details of the geometric structure of the tip apex. However, a simple electrostatic analysis indicates that for |𝑧𝑧0|𝑅, 𝑑 (where 𝑅108 m is the effective size of the STM tip), the force 𝐹𝑥𝑒𝑙 decays at least as |𝑧𝑧0|3. Therefore the influence of the metallic leads can be ignored as long as the STM tip is not too close to them and we can write 𝐹𝑥𝑒𝑙(𝑞(𝑡),𝑧,𝑧0)𝐹𝑥𝑒𝑙(𝑞(𝑡),𝑧𝑧0).

The displacement field 𝑢(𝑧,𝑡) and the force per unit length 𝐹e𝑙𝑥 can be expressed as linear combinations of eigenfunctions 𝜑𝑗(𝑧) of the operator 𝑑4/𝑑𝑧4 with the boundary conditions 𝑢(0,𝑡)=𝑢(𝐿,𝑡)=0, 𝑑𝑢/𝑑𝑧(0,𝑡)=𝑑𝑢/𝑑𝑧(𝐿,𝑡)=0.

The expansion of 𝑢(𝑧,𝑡) and 𝐹e𝑙𝑥 over the complete set of functions 𝜑𝑗(𝑧) makes it possible to decompose (1) into a set of equations of motion for the eigenmode amplitudes 𝑥𝑗(𝑡), which can be written in hamiltonian form by introducing the conjugate momenta 𝜋𝑗(𝑡):


In (2a) and (2b), 𝑓e𝑙𝑗 are the coefficients in the expansion of 𝐹e𝑙𝑥 over the complete set of functions 𝜑𝑗(𝑧) (which are chosen to be dimensionless), 𝑚=𝜌𝑆𝐿 is the mass of the nanotube, and 𝜔𝑗 are the frequencies of the transverse vibrational modes, given by 𝜔𝑗=𝑘𝑗𝐸𝐼/(𝜌𝑆𝐿2), where the eigenvalues 𝑘𝑗 can be found by solving: cos𝑘𝑗1/4cosh𝑘𝑗1/4=1.

We introduced in (2b) a phenomenological damping force for each mode, 𝛾𝑗𝜋𝑗, where 𝛾𝑗 has the dimension of inverse time. The motion of the nanotube is inevitably affected by dissipative mechanisms, which can be related to its coupling to the environment and to several internal processes. We will later consider a general form for 𝛾𝑗 which can be used to describe the damping induced by a wide class of phenomena.

An approximate expression for the force coefficients 𝑓e𝑙𝑗 in (2b) can be found through some physical considerations on the characteristic lengths of the system. Since the eigenfunctions 𝜑𝑗(𝑧) vary appreciably only over distances of the order of 𝐿, we can express each 𝑓e𝑙𝑗 as a sum of a sharply localized contribution at 𝑧0 plus a correction:

𝐿𝑓𝑗𝑒𝑙=𝐿/2𝐿/2𝐹𝑥𝑒𝑙𝑞(𝑡),𝑧𝑧0𝜑𝑗(𝑧)𝑑𝑧=𝑞(𝑡)𝜑𝑗𝑧0𝑅+𝑂2/𝐿2,(3) where >0 is a phenomenological parameter which provides the magnitude of the effective electrostatic field between the STM and the nanotube.

The size of the correction in (3) can be estimated in terms of the characteristic lengths of the system: for the typical values 𝐿107 m and 𝑅108 m, the condition 𝑅2/𝐿21 is fulfilled and that defines the range of validity of the approximation 𝐿𝑓𝑗𝑒𝑙𝑞(𝑡)𝜑𝑗(𝑧0) which we will use from now on.

For what concerns the transport of charge the system is equivalent to a double tunnel junction, having one potential barrier localized between the STM tip and the nanotube and the another one between the nanotube and the leads. In our analysis we will consider the case of electrons for which the decoherence rate is much greater than the tunneling rates, so that the description of tunneling as a stochastic (rather than coherent) process is sufficient.

Furthermore, we consider the system in the Coulomb blockade regime and limit to one the number of extra electrons which can charge the nanotube, that is, 𝑞=𝑁𝑒 with 𝑁= 0, 1. This condition can be realized if the electron temperature and the bias voltage are in the range defined by 𝑘B𝑇<𝑒2/2𝐶STM-NT<𝑒𝑉𝑏<𝑒2/2𝐶NT-L, where 𝐶STM-NT, 𝐶NT-L are the effective capacitances of the STM-nanotube and nanotube-leads junctions, respectively, and 𝐶STM-NT>𝐶NT-L.

Following the approach presented in [16] for a point-like oscillator coupled to a single-electron transistor, we define a probability density in the phase space of the system 𝑃𝑁(𝑥,𝜋,𝑡) such that 𝑃𝑁(𝑥,𝜋,𝑡)𝑑𝑥1𝑑𝜋1𝑑𝑥2𝑑𝜋2 (with all the 𝑥𝑗 and 𝜋𝑗 scaled by proper dimensional factors) is the joint probability that at time 𝑡 there is an extra charge 𝑞=𝑁𝑒 on the nanotube while the values of the eigenmode amplitudes and momenta {𝑥𝑗}, {𝜋𝑗} are within the phase space region defined by 𝑗𝑑𝑥𝑗𝑑𝜋𝑗𝑑𝑥𝑑𝜋. In the regime of single charging of the nanotube only the probability densities 𝑃0(𝑥,𝜋,𝑡) and 𝑃1(𝑥,𝜋,𝑡) play a role in the description of the nanotube dynamics.

The coupling between the mechanical and electronic degrees of freedom arises because the tunneling rate between the STM tip and the nanotube, ΓSTM-NT(𝑥,𝑧0), is affected by their relative distance at point 𝑧0: ΓSTM-CNT(𝑥,𝑧0)=Γ0exp((𝑑+𝑗𝑥𝑗𝜑𝑗(𝑧0))/𝜆), where 𝜆 is the effective tunneling length of the STM-nanotube junction and Γ0 is a constant. The factor Γ0(𝑑)Γ0exp(𝑑/𝜆) is the tunneling rate that would characterize the junction if the motion of the nanotube could be neglected. The tunneling rate between the nanotube and the leads, ΓNT-L, does not depend on the nanotube displacement.

We remark that all the tunneling rates are generally functions of the 𝑉𝑏, which has to be larger than the threshold value 𝑉𝐶𝑒/2𝐶STM-NT in order to make electrons tunnel from the STM tip to the nanotube. However, since here we always assume 𝑉𝑏 fixed at some value we do not explicitly indicate this dependence in the tunneling rates.

The time evolution of the probability densities 𝑃+(𝑥,𝜋,𝑡)𝑃1(𝑥,𝜋,𝑡)+𝑃0(𝑥,𝜋,𝑡) and 𝑃(𝑥,𝜋,𝑡)𝑃1(𝑥,𝜋,𝑡)𝑃0(𝑥,𝜋,𝑡) is determined by the following equations:

𝜕𝑃++𝜕𝑡1+2𝑃++𝑃=0,(4a)𝜕𝑃+𝜕𝑡1+2𝑃++𝑃=Γ𝑥;𝑧0𝑃++Γ+𝑥;𝑧0𝑃,(4b) where Γ+(𝑥;𝑧0)ΓSTM-NT(𝑥;𝑧0)+ΓNT-L, Γ(𝑥;𝑧0)ΓSTM-NT(𝑥;𝑧0)ΓNT-L and the Liouvillian operators 1 and 2 are defined as follows:


From (4a) and (4b) we can derive the equations of motion for any dynamical variable averaged over the probability densities 𝑃+ and 𝑃: ()𝛼()𝑃𝛼(𝑥,𝜋,𝑡)𝑑𝑥𝑑𝜋, where 𝛼=±. The set of equations of motion for the first moments 1𝑝(𝑡), 𝑥𝑗𝛼, 𝜋𝑗𝛼 is:


The set of equations (6a), (6b), and (6c) is not closed because the exponential form of the tunneling rate ΓSTM-NT(𝑥;𝑧0) introduces a coupling between the first and all the other moments. However in the limit of small oscillation amplitudes we can expand ΓSTM-NT(𝑥;𝑧0) to first order in 𝑥𝑗/𝜆 which reduces (6a), (6b), and (6c) to a closed set of linear equations.

The static solution of the linearized equations of motion, 𝜋𝑗𝛼=0, 𝑥𝛼𝑗𝛼=𝑥𝛼𝑗, 𝑝=𝑝, where 𝑥𝛼𝑗 and 𝑝 are constant, describes the nanotube as a slightly bent beam at rest. The stability of this solution can be investigated by substituting the expressions 𝜉𝑘+𝜉𝑘+𝐴𝑘𝑒𝛽𝑘𝑡 (where 𝜉𝑘 is any of the dynamical variables 𝑥𝑘, 𝜋𝑘, 𝑝 and 𝐴𝑘 is constant) in the linearized equations of motion and solving for the exponents 𝛽𝑘 [17].

This procedure leads to an algebraic equation which in general cannot be solved analytically. However, if the dimensionless parameters 𝜀𝑘𝑒𝜑2𝑘(𝑧0)/(𝑚𝜔2𝑘𝜆) are much smaller than 1 and the nanotube is only weakly damped (𝛾𝑘𝜔𝑘), we can look for exponents of the form 𝛽𝑘𝑖𝜔𝑘+𝛿𝑘, with |𝛿𝑘|𝜔𝑘 and derive an analytical expression for the 𝛿𝑘 which up to the first order in all 𝜀𝑘 and 𝛾𝑘 reads

𝛿𝑘𝛾=𝑘2+Γ0(𝑑)ΓNT-L2Γ+𝜔(𝑑)2𝑘𝜀𝑘𝑧0𝜔2𝑘+Γ+2Γ(𝑑)1+𝑖+(𝑑)2𝜔𝑘,(7) where Γ+(𝑑)Γ0(𝑑)+ΓNT-L. The condition 𝜀𝑘1 can be taken as a definition of the weak electromechanical regime, since it implies that the shift in the equilibrium position of the nanotube at point 𝑧0 when it is charged by one extra electron, 𝛿𝑢𝑒𝑗𝜑2𝑗(𝑧0)/(𝑚𝜔2𝑗), is much smaller than the tunneling length 𝜆.

For realistic values of the parameters which are consistent with the conditions of validity of our model (𝑉𝑏 0.1 V, 𝐶STM-NT, 𝐶NT-L1018 F as reported in [18], 𝜆1010 m, 𝜔𝑘102 MHz), 𝑚1022 kg, 𝐿107 m, the regime of weak electromechanical coupling is attained: 𝜀𝑘(𝑧0)0.1 for all the modes at any point 𝑧0 along the nanotube axis.

The sign of the real part of 𝛿𝑘 in (7) determines the stability of the static solution for the 𝑘th average mode amplitude. If 𝔢[𝛿𝑘]>0 then 𝑥𝑘+ increases exponentially in time, hence the static solution for the 𝑘th mode is unstable. This is the signature of a “shuttle-like” electromechanical instability. On the other hand, if 𝔢[𝛿𝑘]<0 the energy pumped into the vibrational mode by the electrostatic field is not able to compensate the loss due to dissipation and after a time interval of the order of 1/𝛾𝑘 the 𝑘th mode amplitude decays to its static value.

For fixed values of 𝛾𝑘, and ΓNT-L, the sign of 𝔢[𝛿𝑘] becomes a function of 𝑧0 and Γ0(𝑑), that is, it depends only on the position of the STM tip in the 𝑥𝑧 plane. We would like to point out that even if the onset of the electromechanical instability requires a bias voltage that overcomes the threshold value set by the Coulomb repulsion, 𝑉𝑏>𝑉𝐶, the magnitude of the Coulomb gap itself does not affect the stability of the vibrational modes, since 𝑉𝐶 appears in (7) only through the difference 𝑉𝑏𝑉𝐶, which determines the tunneling rates Γ0, ΓNT-L and the effective electrostatic field .

The set of values of 𝑧0 and Γ0(𝑑) for which the real part of 𝛿𝑘 is positive defines the instability region for the 𝑘th mode amplitude in the plane (𝑧0,Γ0(𝑑)).

In order to map the instability regions we have to specify an analytic expression for the damping rates 𝛾𝑘. The dissipation of mechanical energy in NEMS can take place through several mechanisms. However, in spite of the variety of the dissipative processes in solids, their effect on the NEMS performance can be described by considering the retardation induced in the NEMS response to mechanical perturbations (which adds to the “instantaneous” elastic behaviour).

In order to include this effect in our model we follow the approach introduced by Zener and formally replace the Young modulus with a frequency dependent complex function which results in the following expression for the damping rates: 𝛾𝑘𝑌𝜔2𝑘𝜏/(1+𝜔2𝑘𝜏2) [15].

A large class of dissipative phenomena in solids (e.g., thermoelasticity, dislocations, and defects dynamics) can be parametrized though the dimensionless coefficient 𝑌 and the relaxation time 𝜏, which both depend on temperature as well as on several geometric and material properties [19].

We first consider the limit in which the characteristic inverse time of the retarded mechanical response is much smaller than the frequencies of the nanotube eigenmodes: 1/𝜏𝜔𝑘. In this case the damping term in (7) does not depend on the frequency and the dissipation rate is the same for all the modes.

In Figure 2 the instability regions determined by (7) for the first three modes are plotted together with the real parts of the exponents 𝛽𝑘 obtained from the numerical analysis of the linear stability problem. The areas labeled by 1, 2 and 3 correspond, respectively to the values of (𝑧0, Γ0(𝑑)) for which only mode 1, 2 and 3 is unstable. The overlap of the instability regions for different modes indicate the possibility of simultaneous excitation of several vibrational modes of the nanotube.

The physical picture presented in Figure 2 changes drastically in the opposite limit, 1/𝜏𝜔𝑘, as can be seen in Figure 3. In this case the first mode is characterized by the smallest dissipation rate, 𝛾1𝛾𝑘,𝑘1, therefore if any of the modes is unstable, also the first one is unstable. That excludes the possibility of promoting a selective instability in the limit 1/𝜏𝜔𝑘.

The dynamical behaviour of the nanotube in the regime of single-mode instability is qualitatively the same of the ordinary “shuttle” system [9]. The amplitude of the oscillations increases exponentially until it reaches a certain steady value which depends on the parameters of the system. This transition is characterized by a large enhancement of the current (with respect to the static tunneling regime) that can be experimentally detected by measuring the current flowing through the device for different positions of the STM tip.

In the phase space of the system the dynamical state in this situation is described by a limit cycle, that is, an isolated closed trajectory characterized by finite amplitude oscillations [17]. Here we have shown that the frequency of this stable self-oscillating state can be selected among the whole set of nanotube resonant frequencies through an accurate positioning of the STM tip.

In conclusion in the present work we studied the dynamics of the flexural vibrations of a suspended carbon nanotube in which extra electrons are injected at a position-dependent rate. We showed that a localized constant electrostatic field can excite many transverse vibrational modes of the nanotube into a “shuttle-like” regime of charge transport. For a fixed bias voltage and in presence of dissipative processes with inverse characteristic times much smaller than the frequencies of the nanotube vibrational modes, we found that it is possible to induce a selective instability through an accurate positioning of an STM. It thus seems possible to extend the approach followed here to other systems characterized by a nontrivial coupling between charge transport and mechanical degrees of freedom.


The author wants to thank L. Y. Gorelik, R. I. Shekhter, and M. Jonson for fruitful discussions and support. Partial financial support from the Swedish VR and from the Faculty of Science at the University of Gothenburg through its “Nanoparticle” Research Platform is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. K. L. Ekinci and M. L. Roukes, “Nanoelectromechanical systems,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 76, Article ID 061101, 12 pages, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  2. M. P. Blencowe, “Nanoelectromechanical systems,” Contemporary Physics, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 249–264, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. K. C. Schwab and M. L. Roukes, “Putting mechanics into quantum mechanics,” Physics Today, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 36–42, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  4. P. Poncharal, Z. L. Wang, D. Ugarte, and W. A. de Heer, “Electrostatic deflections and electromechanical resonances of carbon nanotubes,” Science, vol. 283, no. 5407, pp. 1513–1516, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. T. Purcell, P. Vincent, C. Journet, and V. T. Binh, “Tuning of nanotube mechanical resonances by electric field pulling,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, no. 27, Article ID 276103, 4 pages, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  6. S. Sapmaz, Y. M. Blanter, L. Gurevich, and H. S. J. van der Zant, “Carbon nanotubes as nanoelectromechanical systems,” Physical Review B, vol. 67, no. 23, Article ID 235414, 7 pages, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  7. V. Sazonova, Y. Yalsh, I. Üstünel, D. Roundy, T. A. Arias, and P. L. McEuen, “A tunable carbon nanotube electrochemical oscillator,” Nature, vol. 431, no. 7006, pp. 284–287, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. B. Lassagne, Y. Tarakanov, J. Kinaret, D. Garcia-Sanchez, and A. Bachtold, “Coupling mechanics to charge transport in carbon nanotube mechanical resonators,” Science, vol. 325, no. 5944, pp. 1107–1110, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. L. Y. Gorelik, A. Isacsson, M. V. Voinova, B. Kasemo, R. I. Shekhter, and M. Jonson, “Shuttle mechanism for charge transfer in coulomb blockade nanostructures,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, no. 20, pp. 4526–4529, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  10. A. V. Moskalenko, S. N. Gordeev, O. F. Koentjoro et al., “Nanomechanical electron shuttle consisting of a gold nanoparticle embedded within the gap between two gold electrodes,” Physical Review B, vol. 79, no. 24, Article ID 241403, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. K. Hüttel, M. Pott, B. Witkamp, and H. S. J. van der Zant, “Nano-electromechanics of suspended carbon nanotubes,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 10, no. 9, Article ID 095003, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  12. L. M. Jonsson, L. Y. Gorelik, R. I. Shekhter, and M. Jonson, “Electromechanical instability in suspended carbon nanotubes,” Nano Letters, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1165–1169, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. L. M. Jonsson, L. Y. Gorelik, R. I. Shekhter, and M. Jonson, “Electromechanical instabilities of suspended carbon nanotubes—multi mode excitations,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 90, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. L. M. Jonsson, F. Santandrea, L. Y. Gorelik, R. I. Shekhter, and M. Jonson, “Self-organization of irregular nanoelectromechanical vibrations in multimode shuttle structures,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, no. 18, Article ID 186802, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. N. Cleland, Foundations of Nanomechanics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2003.
  16. A. D. Armour, M. P. Blencowe, and Y. Zhang, “Classical dynamics of a nanomechanical resonator coupled to a single-electron transistor,” Physical Review B, vol. 69, no. 12, Article ID 125313, 5 pages, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  17. S. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry and Engineering, Perseus Books, Cambridge, UK, 2001.
  18. B. J. LeRoy, S. G. Lemay, J. Kong, and C. Dekker, “Scanning tunneling spectroscopy of suspended single-wall carbon nanotubes,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 84, no. 21, pp. 4280–4282, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. S. Nowick and B. S. Berry, Anelastic Relaxation in Crystalline Solids, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1972.

Copyright © 2010 F. Santandrea. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.