Table of Contents
Physics Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 605908, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/605908
Research Article

Measurement in the de Broglie-Bohm Interpretation: Double-Slit, Stern-Gerlach, and EPR-B

1University Paris Dauphine, Lamsade, 75 016 Paris, France
2École Nationale de l’Aviation Civile, 31000 Toulouse, France

Received 24 February 2014; Accepted 7 July 2014; Published 10 August 2014

Academic Editor: Anand Pathak

Copyright © 2014 Michel Gondran and Alexandre Gondran. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. S. Bell, “On the impossible pilot wave,” in Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  2. D. Bohm, “A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of hidden variables, I and II,” Physical Review, vol. 85, pp. 166–193, 1952. View at Google Scholar
  3. J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1996. View at MathSciNet
  4. B. d’Espagnat, A la Recherche du Rée, Gauthiers-Villard, Paris, France, 1979.
  5. J. S. Bell, Speakable and Un Speakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 2004.
  6. L. de Broglie, “La mécani que ondulatoire et la structure atomique de la matière et du rayonnement,” Journal de Physique et Le Radium, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 225–241, 1927, An English translation can be found in G. Bacciagalluppi and A. Valentini, Quantum Theory of the Crossroads (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2009). View at Google Scholar
  7. C. Jönsson, “Elektroneninte rferenzen an mehreren künstlich hergestellten Feinspalten,” Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 161, pp. 454–474, 1961. View at Google Scholar
  8. E. Madelung, “Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer form,” Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 40, no. 3-4, pp. 322–326, 1927. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Gondran and A. Gondran, “Discerned and non-discerned particles in classical mechanics and convergence of quantum mechanics to classical mechanics,” Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 117–135, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Gondran and A. Gondran, “The two limits of the Schrödinger equation in the semi-classical approximation: discerned and non-discerned particles in classical mechanics,” in Foundations of Probability and Physics-6, vol. 1424 of AIP Conference Proceedings, pp. 111–115, 2012.
  11. R. Feynman and A. Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics and Paths Integrals, McGraw-Hill, 1965.
  12. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1977.
  13. D. Dürr, S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghi, “Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty,” Journal of Statistical Physics, vol. 67, no. 5-6, pp. 843–907, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  14. A. S. Sanz and S. Miret-Artés, “Quantum phase analysis with quantum trajectories: a step towards the creation of a Bohmian thinking,” The American Journal of Physics, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 525–533, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. Norsen, “The pilot-wave perspective on quantum scattering and tunneling,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 258–266, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. Young, “On the theory of light and colors,” Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society, vol. 92, pp. 12–48, 1802. View at Google Scholar
  17. C. Davisson and L. H. Germer, “The scattering of electrons by a single crystal of nickel,” Nature, vol. 119, no. 2998, pp. 558–560, 1927. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. G. Merlin, G. F. Missiroli, and G. Pozzi, “On the statistical aspect of electron interference phenomena,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 306–307, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. A. Tonomura, J. Endo, T. Matsuda, T. Kawasaki, and H. Ezawa, “Demonstration of single-electron buildup of an interference pattern,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 57, pp. 117–120, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. H. V. Halbon Jr. and P. Preiswerk, “Preuve expérimentale de la diffraction des neutrons,” Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, vol. 203, pp. 73–75, 1936. View at Google Scholar
  21. H. Rauch and A. Werner, Neutron Interferometry: Lessons in Experimental Quantum Mechanics, Oxford University Press, London, UK, 2000.
  22. A. Zeilinger, R. Gähler, C. G. Shull, W. Treimer, and W. Mampe, “Single- and double-slit diffraction of neutrons,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 1067–1073, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. I. Estermann and O. Stern, “Beugung von Molekularstrahlen,” Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 61, no. 1-2, pp. 95–125, 1930. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. F. Shimizu, K. Shimizu, and H. Takuma, “Double-slit interference with ultracold metastable neon atoms,” Physical Review A, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. R17–R20, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. H. Anderson, J. R. Ensher, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, “Observation of Bose-Einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor,” Science, vol. 269, no. 5221, pp. 198–201, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Arndt, O. Nairz, J. Vos-Andreae, C. Keller, G. van der Zouw, and A. Zellinger, “Wave-particle duality of C60 molecules,” Nature, vol. 401, no. 6754, pp. 680–682, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. O. Nairz, M. Arndt, and A. Zeilinger, “Experimental challenges in fullerene interferometry,” Journal of Modern Optics, vol. 47, no. 14-15, pp. 2811–2821, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Vol. 3: Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, New York, NY, USA, 1965. View at MathSciNet
  29. M. Gondran and A. Gondran, “Numerical simulation of the double slit interference with ultracold atoms,” The American Journal of Physics, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 507–515, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. Philippidis, C. Dewdney, and B. J. Hiley, “Quantum interference and the quantum potential,” Il Nuovo Cimento B: Serie 11, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 15–28, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  31. W. Gerlach and O. Stern, “Der experimentelle Nachweis des magnetischen moments des silberatoms,” Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 110–111, 1921. View at Google Scholar
  32. W. Gerlach and O. Stern, “Der experimentelle Nachweis der Richtungsquantelung im Magnetfeld,” Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 349–352, 1922. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. H. D. Zeh, “On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory,” Foundations of Physics, vol. 1, pp. 69–76, 1970, Reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek, pp. 342–349, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  34. W. H. Zurek, “Environment-induced superselection rules,” Physical Review D: Particles and Fields, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1862–1880, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  35. J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek, Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton Series in Physics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1983. View at MathSciNet
  36. W. H. Zurek, “Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 715–775, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  37. R. Omnès, “Consistent interpretations of quantum mechanics,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 339–382, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  38. M. Schlosshauer, Decoherence and the Quantumto—Classical Transition, Springer, 2007.
  39. J. J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, 1985.
  40. M. Le Bellac, Quantum Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2006.
  41. T. Takabayasi, “On the formulation of quantum mechanics associated with classical pictures,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 143–182, 1952. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  42. T. Takabayasi, “The formulation of quantum mechanics in terms of ensemble in phase space,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 11, no. 4-5, pp. 341–373, 1954. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  43. D. Bohm, R. Schiller, and J. Tiomno, “A causal interpretation of the pauli equation,” Il Nuovo Cimento Series, supplement 1, pp. 48–66, 1955. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. D. Bohm and B. J. Hiley, The Undivided Universe, Routledge, London, UK, 1993. View at MathSciNet
  45. C. Dewdney, P. R. Holland, and A. Kyprianidis, “What happens in a spin measurement?” Physics Letters A, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 259–267, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. P. R. Holland, The Quantum Theory of Motion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1993. View at MathSciNet
  47. D. E. Platt, “A modern analysis of the Stern-Gerlach experiment,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 306–308, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. M. Gondran, A. Gondran, and A. Kenoufi, “Decoherence time and spin measurement in the Stern-Gerlach experiment,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1424, pp. 116–120, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  49. G. B. Roston, M. Casas, A. Plastino, and A. R. Plastino, “Quantum entanglement, spin-1/2 and the Stern-Gerlach experiment,” European Journal of Physics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 657–672, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. A. Challinor, A. Lasenby, S. Gull, and C. Doran, “A relativistic causal account of a spin measurement,” Physics Letters A, vol. 218, no. 3–6, pp. 128–138, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. S. Kochen and E. P. Specker, “The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics,” Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, vol. 17, pp. 59–87, 1967. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  52. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?” Physical Review, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 777–780, 1935. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. D. Bohm, Quantum Theory, Prentice-Hall, New York, NY, USA, 1951.
  54. D. Bohm and Y. Aharanov, “Discussion of experimental proof for the paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky,” vol. 108, pp. 1070–1076, 1957. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  55. J. S. Bell, “On the Einstein Podolsky rosen paradox,” Physics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 195–200, 1964. View at Google Scholar
  56. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, “Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 23, no. 15, pp. 880–884, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. S. J. Freedman and J. F. Clauser, “Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 28, no. 14, pp. 938–941, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, “Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: a new violation of Bell's inequalities,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 91–94, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, “Experimental test of Bell's inequalities using time-varying analyzers,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 49, no. 25, pp. 1804–1807, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  60. W. Tittel, J. Brendel, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, “Violation of bell inequalities by photons more than 10 km apart,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 81, no. 17, pp. 3563–3566, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. G. Weihs, T. Jennewein, C. Simon, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, “Violation of Bell's inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 81, no. 23, pp. 5039–5043, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  62. R. A. Bertlmann and A. Zeilinger, Eds., Quantum [Un]speakables: From Bell to Quantum Information, Springer, 2002.
  63. M. Genovese, “Research on hidden variable theories: a review of recent progresses,” Physics Reports, vol. 413, no. 6, pp. 319–396, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  64. A. Beige, W. J. Munro, and P. L. Knight, “Bell's inequality test with entangled atoms,” Physical Review A, vol. 62, no. 5, Article ID 052102, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. M. A. Rowe, D. Kielpinski, V. Meyer et al., “Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection,” Nature, vol. 409, no. 6822, pp. 791–794, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. C. Dewdney, P. R. Holland, and A. Kyprianidis, “A causal account of nonlocal Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen spin correlations,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, vol. 20, no. 14, pp. 4717–4732, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  67. C. Dewdney, P. R. Holland, A. Kyprianidis, and J. P. Vigier, “Spin and non-locality in quantum mechanics,” Nature, vol. 336, no. 6199, pp. 536–544, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. M. Gondran and A. Gondran, “A new causal interpretation of EPR-B experiment,” in Proceedings of the International Conference Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations-6 (QTRF '12), pp. 370–375, Vaxjo, Sweden, June 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. A. Einstein, Ether and the Theory of Relativity, University of Leyden, 1920.
  70. K. Popper, Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics: From The Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinsons, London, UK, edited by W. W. Bartley III, 1982.
  71. E. Schrödinger, “Der stetige Übergang von der Mikro- zur Makromechanik,” Die Naturwissenschaften, vol. 14, no. 28, pp. 664–666, 1926. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. R. J. Glauber, C. deWitt, A. Blandin, and C. Cohen-Tanoudji, in Quantum Optics and Electronics, Les Houches Lectures 1964, p. 63, Gordon and Breach, New York, NY, USA, 1965.
  73. I. Bialynicki-Birula, M. Kaliński, and J. H. Eberly, “Lagrange equilibrium points in celestial mechanics and nonspreading wave packets for strongly driven rydberg electrons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 73, no. 13, pp. 1777–1780, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. A. Buchleitner and D. Delande, “Nondispersive electronic wave packets in multiphoton processes,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 75, no. 8, pp. 1487–1490, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. A. Buchleitner, D. Delande, and J. Zakrzewski, “Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems,” Physics Reports, vol. 368, no. 5, pp. 409–547, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  76. H. Maeda and T. F. Gallagher, “Nondispersing wave packets,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 92, Article ID 133004, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. L. de Broglie and J. L. Andrade e Silva, La Réinterprétation de la Mécanique Ondulatoire, Gauthier-Villars, 1971.