Table of Contents
Physics Research International
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 4835328, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4835328
Research Article

Structural and Magnetic Properties of Mn Doped BiFeO3 Nanomaterials

1Department of Physics, Government Institute of Electronics, Secunderabad 500026, India
2Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Nishitha College of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabad 509215, India
3Department of Physics, JNTUH College of Engineering Jagtial, Nachupally (Kondagattu), Karimnagar 505 501, India

Received 18 October 2015; Accepted 22 February 2016

Academic Editor: Ali Hussain Reshak

Copyright © 2016 V. Srinivas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Nanocrystalline    materials were synthesized using sol-gel technique. The structural and magnetic properties were investigated in detail. Rietveld analysis from XRD revealed the structural formation of BiFeO3. As the Mn doping concentration was increased, the structure of BiFeO3 changed from rhombohedral to tetragonal. All the M-H loops showed the ferromagnetic behavior in the prepared samples. Magnetization was observed to enhance as the Mn doping concentration was increased. The enhanced magnetization may be due to the collapse of the space modulated spin structure as observed from the structural changes.

1. Introduction

BiFeO3 (BFO) is an interesting material due to the coexistence of G-type antiferromagnetic (AFM) structure having Néel temperature around 640 K and ferroelectric polarization with Curie temperature around 1000 K [1, 2]. BFO is considered to be superior candidate for the next generation devices such as spintronics, piezoelectric sensors, optoelectronic devices, nonvolatile memories, and high density microactuators [3, 4]. The spontaneous magnetization in BFO could be induced by changing Fe-O-Fe bond angle or by the statistical octahedral distribution of Fe [5, 6]. Room temperature ferromagnetic properties of rare earth and transition metal ions doped BFO materials were observed by several researchers. The enhanced magnetization was observed in BFO due to the divalent, trivalent, and rare earth ions on Fe site [7, 8]. Literature suggests that the superexchange interaction within Fe3+-O-Fe2+ gives rise to a finite value of magnetization in BFO [9]. The enhanced magnetization in Mn and Ho doped BFO thin films prepared by chemical solution deposition was due to the collapse of space modulated spin structure by the structural transition [10]. The magnetic ordering in BFO is G-type antiferromagnetic; the contribution of the antiferromagnetic sublattices could lead to weak ferromagnetism [11]. Doping of trivalent, divalent, and rare earth elements in BFO was observed to enhance the magnetization by suppressing the cycloid spin structure and reducing the leakage current density and enhancing the multiferroic properties [1216]. When Mn is substituted for Fe site, ferroelectric properties were observed to improve [17]. It was observed that BFO shows weak magnetization and poor polarization due to the spiral spin structure and leakage problem [18, 19]. The secondary phases and oxygen vacancies in BFO may also affect the magnetic and electrical properties [1, 20]. The magnetic properties of BFO are also related to the local spin structure of FeO6 octahedron [18]. Among all the elements Mn doped BFO was observed to contribute to enhanced magnetization [21, 22]. Bulk BFO crystallizes in a rhombohedral distorted perovskite structure R3c space group. Partially orbital of Fe ions leads to G-type antiferromagnetic structure [2325]. BFO multiferroic materials in nanofilm, bulk film, and thin film forms have been extensively investigated during the last decade. Since BFO materials are having interesting properties, therefore, in the present work, we aimed to present their structural and magnetic properties in detail.

2. Experimental

Mn doped BFO was synthesized using sol-gel method [7, 8, 26]. The A.R Grade citric acid (C6H8O7·H2O), bismuth nitrate (Bi(NO3)3·5H2O), manganese nitrate (Mn(NO3)3·4H2O), and ferric nitrate (Fe(NO3)3·9H2O) (≥99%) were used as starting materials. During synthesis, an excess of 5 wt.% Bi was added to compensate bismuth oxide loss during the thermal treatment. Without this additional bismuth addition, the pure phase of BFO could not be obtained. The entire synthesis process is described elsewhere [26]. The as-prepared powder samples were heat treated at temperature of 600°C. The X-ray diffraction of the ferrite powders was carried using a Philips PW 1820 powder diffractometer with CuK graphite monochromated radiation, operating at 40 kV and 30 mA, with solar slits and divergent and receiving slits of 0.2 mm. The diffracted intensity was registered in the angular range 8° ≤ 2θ ≤ 80°, with a step size of 0.02° (). The micrographs of all samples were taken on FEI Quanta FEG 200 High Resolution Scanning Electron Microscope. Room temperature magnetic properties were investigated using Lakeshore’s (USA) vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM 7410).

3. Results and Discussions

Figure 1(a) shows Rietveld analysis for BiFeO3 sample. All the XRD peaks correspond to BiFeO3 structure. Apart from the main BiFeO3 peaks few minor peaks belonging to Bi2Fe4O9/Bi25FeO29/Bi2O3 are visible in the 2θ° range between 25 and 30. It is reported most often that BiFeO3 is accompanied by secondary phases such as Bi2Fe4O9 and Bi25FeO29 [2729]. The impurity phases in the XRD patterns could be attributed to the volatilization of Bi3+ ions which resulted due to excess addition of Bi. The high vapour pressure of Bi atoms tends easy evaporation of Bi3+ ions during synthesis conditions, such as drying and annealing conditions. Therefore, for Mn and BFO synthesis, we have used excess Bi3+ ions. Without this additional bismuth addition, the pure phase of BFO could not be obtained. Berbenni et al. [29] showed that if BFO is annealed at temperatures ≥ 750°C, the secondary phases such as BiO3, Fe2O3, and Bi2Fe4O9 will disappear. It seems that higher annealing temperature increases the intensity of characteristic BFO peaks and reduces the intensity of secondary phases but it may not be possible to avoid the secondary phases even though the samples were annealed at 800°C [29]. When we annealed BFO powders at temperatures ≥ 750°C, the BFO powder melted and stuck to the crucible. For this reason, we have chosen 600°C as the final annealing temperature for our samples.

Figure 1: (a) Rietveld analysis of BiFeO3 sample. (b) X-ray diffraction patterns of : (a) , (b) , (c) , and (d) .

From Figure 1(b), it is clearly observed that, for , the diffraction can be indexed to a rhombohedral (R3c) structure, whereas for it is tetragonal (P4mm) phase. Similar kind of results was observed for () synthesized by sol-gel method [30]. The XRD diffraction peaks for all the samples were similar to those published in the literature. The diffraction peak at , 22.5° (012) and diffraction peak around 32° (104) and (110) are indexed for rhombohedral structure. With the increase in Mn concentration to the diffraction at 46° splits into two peaks (002) and (200) as a characteristic peak for tetragonal (P4mm) space group. The rhombohedral (R3c) structure was observed for pure BFO and was considered as the distortion from cubic perovskite pmsm structure [31]. When the pmsm and R3c crystal structures were present in samples simultaneously, they were expected to show both weak ferromagnetic and ferroelectric properties [31].

Figure 2 shows the SEM micrographs for all the samples. SEM analysis showed the average grain size around 200 nm. There was no significant change in the grain size with the increase in Mn doping concentration. The magnetic hysteresis loops of    samples are shown in Figure 3. All the samples show unsaturated magnetization. The highest magnetization was observed for the composition . Similar kinds of results were observed for for () BFOBCZT ceramics [23]. Pure BFO is observed to be antiferromagnetic with G-type spin ordering below Néel’s temperature. As there was no significant change in the BMFO grain size with doping concentration (see Figure 2), it can be said that the enhancement of magnetization may not be attributed to the dependency of size on the doping concentration. Similar kinds of results were observed for Mn doped BFO powder samples [18]. The weak ferromagnetism in BFO powder samples was observed to depend not only on the DM interactions but also on the single-ion anisotropy [31, 32]. It is well known that BFO is G-type antiferromagnet and each Fe3+ spin is surrounded by six canted antiparallel spins on the nearest Fe neighbors which allow net magnetic moment [8, 9]. Except for sample all other samples showed very small remanent magnetization; the exact reason for this kind of behavior is not known. The observed hysteresis of all the samples without saturation point was explained due to the persistence of the uncompensated antiferromagnetism in the samples [23]. As the Mn doping concentration was increased, the magnetization was observed to increase. Mn substitution induced the structural phase change from R3c to P4mm and this results in the destruction of spin cycloid structure and thus the homogeneous structure was formed. Wu et al. [30] reported the enhanced magnetization due to Mn and La codoping. However, the observed magnetization value for our samples was small compared to those in literature. This might be due to several factors such as synthesis technique, synthesis conditions, annealing conditions, and temperature. The enhanced magnetization with further substitution of Fe3+ ions with Mn3+ (d4) ions could break the balance within antiparallel sublattice magnetization due to the Jahn-Teller distortion of MnO6 octahedron [30, 33]. For small doping concentration of Mn, Jahn-Teller distortion would enhance and may affect the DM interactions which in turn enhance the weak ferromagnetism [20, 23, 3032, 34]. It was observed that ferromagnetism in Mn doped BFO might be due to induced defects created by excess Bi in the interstitial region of the BFO lattice [32].

Figure 2: SEM micrographs of : (a) , (b) , (c) , and (d) .
Figure 3: Magnetic hysteresis loops of samples measured at room temperature.

The magnetic interactions of BFO can be modified by the substitution of different elements in BFO [30]. Several researchers have tried to improve the structural and magnetic properties of BFO by substituting transition metals [1, 3542]. Structural defects, control of grain size, or thickness of thin films can regulate the magnetic properties of thin films [43]. Introducing defects like oxygen vacancies during synthesis in BFO powders or thin films also induces ferromagnetism [44]. For multiferroic materials, they are required to have both ferroelectric and ferromagnetic properties. As observed from our results, these samples showed both rhombohedral (R3c) and tetragonal (P4mm) structures; therefore, these materials could be suitable for ferroelectric materials.

4. Conclusions

Mn doped BFO nanopowders were successfully synthesized using sol-gel method. Pure BFO showed rhombohedral structure. As the Mn doping content was increased, the structure of the sample changed from rhombohedral to tetragonal structure. Grain size did not show any considerable change with increasing doping concentration. The magnetization was observed to enhance as the doping content was increased due to Jahn-Teller distortion. With the appearance of rhombohedral (R3c) and tetragonal (P4mm) structures, these materials could be suitable candidate for ferroelectric materials.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to sophisticated analytical instrument facility (SAIF), Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Madras, India, for providing the experimental facilities. K. Vijaya Kumar is thankful to Professor N. V. Ramana, Principal, JNTUH CEJ, Nachupally (Kondagattu), Karimnagar District.

References

  1. J. Wang, J. B. Neaton, H. Zheng et al., “Epitaxial BiFeO3 multiferroic thin film heterostructures,” Science, vol. 299, no. 5613, pp. 1719–1722, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. J. Feng, M. Wang, F. Liu, B. Duan, J. Tiam, and X. Guo, “Enhanced optical properties and the origin of carrier transport in BiFeO3/TiO2 heterostructures with 109° domain walls,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 628, pp. 311–316, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. H. Uchida, R. Ueno, H. Funakubo, and S. Koda, “Crystal structure and ferroelectric properties of rare-earth substituted BiFeO3 thin films,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 100, no. 1, Article ID 014106, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. C. M. Raghavan, J. W. Kim, and S. S. Kim, “Effects of Ho and Ti doping on structural and electrical properties of BiFeO3 thin films,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 235–240, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Kothari, V. Raghavendra Reddy, A. Gupta et al., “Study of the effect of Mn doping on the BiFeO3 system,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 19, no. 13, Article ID 136202, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. W. Prellier, M. P. Singh, and P. Murugavel, “The single-phase multiferroic oxides: from bulk to thin film,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 17, no. 30, pp. R803–R832, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. T.-Y. Kim, N. H. Hong, T. Sugawara, A. T. Raghavender, and M. Kurisu, “Room temperature ferromagnetism with large magnetic moment at low field in rare-earth-doped BiFeO3 thin films,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 25, no. 20, Article ID 206003, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. A. T. Raghavender, N. H. Hong, C. Park, M.-H. Jung, K. J. Lee, and D. Lee, “Thickness dependent magnetic properties of BiFeO3 thin films prepared by pulsed laser deposition,” Materials Letters, vol. 65, no. 17-18, pp. 2786–2788, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. N. H. Hong, N. T. Huong, T.-Y. Kim, S. Goumri-Said, and M. B. Kanoun, “Tuning magnetic properties of BiFeO3 thin films by controlling rare-earth doping: experimental and first-principles studies,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 119, no. 25, pp. 14351–14357, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. W. Ye, G. Tan, G. Dong, H. Ren, and A. Xia, “Improved multiferroic properties in (Ho, Mn) co-doped BiFeO3 thin films prepared by chemical solution deposition,” Ceramics International, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 4668–4674, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Wang and C.-W. Nan, “Effect of Tb doping on electric and magnetic behavior of BiFeO3 thin films,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 103, no. 2, Article ID 024103, 5 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. G. D. Hu, X. Cheng, W. B. Wu, and C. H. Yang, “Effects of Gd substitution on structure and ferroelectric properties of BiFeO3 thin films prepared using metal organic decomposition,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 91, no. 23, Article ID 232909, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. T. D. Rao, T. Karthik, A. Srinivas, and S. Asthana, “Study of structural, magnetic and electrical properties on Ho-substituted BiFeO3,” Solid State Communications, vol. 152, no. 23, pp. 2071–2077, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. M. Raghava, J. W. Kim, and S. S. Kim, “Structural and electrical properties of (Bi0.9Dy0.1)(Fe0.975TM0.025)O3±δ (TM=Ni2+, Cr3+ and Ti4+) thin films,” Ceramics International, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 6057–6062, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. P. Suresh and S. Srinath, “Effect of La substitution on structure and magnetic properties of sol-gel prepared BiFeO3,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 113, no. 17, Article ID 17D920, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. S. K. Srivastav, N. S. Gajbhiye, and A. Banerjee, “Structural transformation and enhancement in magnetic properties of single-phase Bi1-xPrxFeO3 nanoparticles,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 113, no. 20, Article ID 203917, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. S. K. Singh and H. Ishiwara, “Room temperature ferroelectric properties of Mn-substituted BiFeO3 thin films deposited on Pt electrodes using chemical solution deposition,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 88, no. 26, Article ID 262908, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. L. Chen, L. Zheng, Y. He, J. Zhang, Z. Mao, and X. Chen, “The local distortion and electronic behavior in Mn doped BiFeO3,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 633, pp. 216–219, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. G. Catalan and J. F. F. Scott, “Physics and applications of bismuth ferrite,” Advanced Materials, vol. 21, no. 24, pp. 2463–2485, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Ederer and N. A. Spaldin, “Influence of strain and oxygen vacancies on the magnetoelectric properties of multiferroic bismuth ferrite,” Physical Review B, vol. 71, no. 22, Article ID 224103, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. S. Chauhan, M. Kumar, S. Chhoker et al., “Multiferroic, magnetoelectric and optical properties of Mn doped BiFeO3 nanoparticles,” Solid State Communications, vol. 152, no. 6, pp. 525–529, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. I. Sosnowska, W. Schafer, W. Kockelman, H. Andersen, and L. O. Troyanchuk, “Crystal structure and spiral magnetic ordering of BiFeO3 doped with manganese,” Applied Physics A, vol. 74, supplement 1, pp. s1040–s1042, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. J. Yi, Y. Tian, L. Wei et al., “Structure, dielectric, ferroelectric, and magnetic properties of (1-x) BiFeO3−x (Ba0.85Ca0.15)(Zr0.10Ti0.90)O3 ceramics,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 66, pp. 132–139, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. W. Eerenstein, N. D. Mathur, and J. F. Scott, “Multiferroic and magnetoelectric materials,” Nature, vol. 442, no. 7104, pp. 759–765, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S.-W. Cheong and M. Mostovoy, “Multiferroics: a magnetic twist for ferroelectricity,” Nature Materials, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. T. Raghavender and N. H. Hong, “Effects of Mn doping on structural and magnetic properties of multiferroic BiFeO3,” Journal of Magnetics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 19–22, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. I. Sosnowska, T. P. Neumaier, and E. Steichele, “Spiral magnetic ordering in bismuth ferrite,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, vol. 15, no. 23, p. 4835, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  28. R. Palai, R. S. Katiyar, H. Schmid et al., “β Phase and γβ metal-insulator transition in multiferroic Bi Fe O3,” Physical Review B, vol. 77, no. 1, Article ID 014110, 11 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. V. Berbenni, C. Milanese, G. Bruni, A. Girella, and A. Marini, “Mechanical activation of the solid-phase reaction between bismuth citrate and iron(II) oxalate dihydrate to yield BiFeO3,” Ceramics International, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 7216–7220, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. J. Wu, N. Li, J. Xu, S. Zhou, Y. Jiang, and Z. Xie, “Synthesis, phase diagram and magnetic properties of 1xBiFeO3−xLaMnO3 solid solution,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 634, pp. 142–147, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. C. Ederer and N. A. Spaldin, “Weak ferromagnetism and magnetoelectric coupling in bismuth ferrite,” Physical Review B, vol. 71, no. 6, Article ID 060401(R), 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. S. K. Pradhan, J. Das, P. P. Rout et al., “Defect driven multiferroicity in Gd doped BiFeO3 at room temperature,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 322, no. 22, pp. 3614–3622, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. G. Kartopu, A. Lahmar, and M. Es-Souni, “Observation of structural transitions and Jahn-Teller distortion in LaMnO3-doped BiFeO3 thin films,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, no. 15, Article ID 151910, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. L. S. Chen, Y. H. He, J. Zhang, Z. Q. Mao, Y. J. Zhao, and X. Chen, “The oxygen octahedral distortion induced magnetic enhancement in multiferroic Bi1−xYbxFe0.95Co0.05O3 powders,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 604, pp. 327–330, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. N. Li, J. Wu, Y. Jiang, Z. Xie, L. Zheng, and Z.-G. Ye, “Structure and multiferroic properties of Bi(1-x)DyxFe0.90Mg0.05Ti0.05O3 solid solution,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 113, no. 5, Article ID 054102, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. W.-M. Zhu, L. W. Su, Z.-G. Ye, and W. Ren, “Enhanced magnetization and polarization in chemically modified multiferroic (1-x)BiFeO3xDyFeO3 solid solution,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 94, no. 14, Article ID 142908, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. Y.-J. Zhang, H.-G. Zhang, J.-H. Yin et al., “Structural and magnetic properties in Bi1−xRxFeO3 (x=0−1, R=La, Nd, Sm, Eu and Tb) polycrystalline ceramics,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 322, no. 15, pp. 2251–2255, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. S. Y. Wang, X. Qiu, J. Gao et al., “Electrical reliability and leakage mechanisms in highly resistive multiferroic La0.1Bi0.9FeO3 ceramics,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 98, no. 15, Article ID 152902, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. V. A. Khomchenko, D. V. Karpinsky, A. L. Kholkin et al., “Rhombohedral-to-orthorhombic transition and multiferroic properties of Dy-substituted BiFeO3,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 108, no. 7, Article ID 074109, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. F. Azough, R. Freer, M. Thrall, R. Cernik, F. Tuna, and D. Collison, “Microstructure and properties of Co-, Ni-, Zn-, Nb- and W-modified multiferroic BiFeO3 ceramics,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 727–736, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. V. A. Khomchenko, I. O. Troyanchuk, M. I. Kovetskaya, and J. A. Paixão, “Mn substitution-driven structural and magnetic phase evolution in Bi1−xSmxFeO3 multiferroics,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 111, no. 1, Article ID 014110, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. A. Ianculescu, F. P. Gheorghiu, P. Postolache, O. Oprea, and L. Mitoseriu, “The role of doping on the structural and functional properties of BiFe1-xMnxO3 magnetoelectric ceramics,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 504, no. 2, pp. 420–426, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. T.-J. Park, G. C. Papaefthymiou, A. J. Viescas, A. R. Moodenbaugh, and S. S. Wong, “Size-dependent magnetic properties of single-crystalline multiferroic BiFeO3 nanoparticles,” Nano Letters, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 766–772, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. J. Wu, S. Mao, Z.-G. Ye, Z. Xie, and L. Zheng, “Room-temperature ferromagnetic/ferroelectric BiFeO3 synthesized by a self-catalyzed fast reaction process,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 20, pp. 6512–6516, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar