Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Pathology Research International
Volume 2011, Article ID 636495, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/636495
Clinical Study

Base-Rate Error in the Interpretation of Immunohistochemistry

Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, Pond Street, Hampstead, London, NW3 2QG, UK

Received 10 February 2011; Revised 21 March 2011; Accepted 23 March 2011

Academic Editor: Pablo A. Bejarano

Copyright © 2011 Malcolm Galloway. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, “Evidential impact of base rates,” in Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, Eds., pp. 153–160, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  2. W. Casscells, A. Schoenberger, and T. B. Graboys, “Interpretation by physicians of clinical laboratory results,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 299, no. 18, pp. 999–1001, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. M. Eddy, “Probablistic reaaoning in clinical medicine: problems and opportunities,” in Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, Eds., pp. 249–267, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  4. G. H. Lyman and L. Balducci, “Overestimation of test effects in clinical judgement,” Journal of Cancer Education, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 297–307, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  5. G. Gigerenzer, Calculated Risks: How to Know When Numbers Deceive You, Simon and Schuster, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
  6. U. Hoffrage, S. Lindsey, R. Hertwig, and G. Gigerenzer, “Communicating statistical information,” Science, vol. 290, no. 5500, pp. 2261–2262, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus