Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Pathology Research International
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 146542, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/146542
Research Article

Comparative Study of Cytomorphological Robinson’s Grading for Breast Carcinoma with Modified Bloom-Richardson Histopathological Grading

Department of Pathology, D.D.U. Hospital, Harinagar, New Delhi 110066, India

Received 26 May 2013; Revised 11 August 2013; Accepted 25 August 2013

Academic Editor: Luigi M. Terracciano

Copyright © 2013 Neelam Sood et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. Agarwal and P. Ramakant, “Breast cancer care in India: the current scenario and the challenges for the future,” Breast Care, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Rosa, A. Mohammadi, and S. Masood, “The value of fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of palpable breast lesions,” Diagnostic Cytopathology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 26–34, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Masood, “Assessment of prognostic factor in breast FNA,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 113, supplement 1, pp. s84–s96, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  4. C. W. Elston and I. O. Ellis, “Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up,” Histopathology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 403–410, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. S. Rekha, N. M. Nandini, and M. Dhar, “Validity of different cytological grading systems of breast carcinoma-a hospital-based study in South India,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 3013–3016, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  6. F. A. Wani, S. Bhardwaj, D. Kumar, and P. Katoch, “Cytological grading of breast cancers and comparative evaluation of two grading systems,” Journal of Cytology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 55–58, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Cangiarella and A. Simsir, “Breast,” in Orell & Sterrett’s Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology, S. R. Orell and G. F. Sterrett, Eds., pp. 156–161, Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, Pa, USA; Elsevier Limited, Beijing, China, 5th edition, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  8. A. K. Das, K. Kapila, A. K. Dinda, and K. Verma, “Comparative evaluation of grading of breast carcinomas in fine needle aspirates by two methods,” Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 118, pp. 247–250, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. N. Pandya and N. P. Shah, “Comparative evaluation of Robinson’s cytological grading with Elston and Ellis’ Nottingham modification of bloom Richardson histopathology grading for breast carcinoma,” National Journal of Community Medicine, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 491–495, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  10. N. Khan, N. Afroz, F. Rana, and M. A. Khan, “Role of cytologic grading in prognostication of invasive breast carcinoma,” Journal of Cytology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 65–68, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Das, Kalyani, and H. Kumar, “Breast carcinoma aspirates: a study on cytological grading,” International Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 189–195, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  12. R. Yoshida, N. Kimura, Y. Harada, and N. Ohuchi, “The loss of E-cadherin, alpha- and beta-catenin expression is associated with metastasis and poor prognosis in invasive breast cancer,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 513–520, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. H. Yu, R. S. Cajulis, and D. V. S. De Frias, “Tumor cell (dys)cohesion as a prognostic factor in aspirate smears of breast carcinoma,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 315–319, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. H. Yu, T. J. Lawton, T. L. Pasha, and C. Reynolds, “Intercellular adhesion molecule expression in ductal carcinoma of the breast: correlation of immunohistochemical staining with cytologic smear pattern,” Diagnostic Cytopathology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 73–76, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  15. V. Bhargava, M. Jain, K. Agarwal, S. Thomas, and S. Singh, “Critical appraisal of cytological nuclear grading in carcinoma of the breast and its correlation with ER/PR expression,” Journal of Cytology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 58–61, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Abati, J. Abele, S. S. Bacus et al., “The uniform approach to breast fine needle aspiration biopsy,” Diagnostic Cytopathology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 295–311, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  17. I. A. Robinson, G. McKee, A. Nicholson et al., “Prognostic value of cytological grading of fine-needle aspirates from breast carcinomas,” The Lancet, vol. 343, no. 8903, pp. 947–949, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. L. Katz, “Editorial: a turning point in breast cancer cytology reporting: moving from callowness to maturity,” Acta Cytologica, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 881–883, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus