Clinical Study

Prevalence, Spinal Alignment, and Mobility of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with or without Chronic Low Back Pain: A Community-Dwelling Study

Table 4

Comparisons of spinal alignment in LSS subjects with or without CLBP.

VariablesLSS alone ( 𝑛 = 2 2 )LSS+CLBP ( 𝑛 = 4 6 )Total ( 𝑛 = 6 8 )

Upr thoracic kyphosis angle (°)40.7 (5.3)35.0 (11.9)*36.9 (10.5)
Upr lumbar kyphosis angle (°)−10.7 (12.4)0.1 (20.4)*−3.6 (18.7)
Upr spinal inclination (°)5.5 (6.8)12.1 (11.9)*9.8 (10.9)
Flex thoracic kyphosis angle (°)45.2 (10.1)40.3 (13.1)41.9 (12.3)
Flex lumbar kyphosis angle (°)9.5 (17.0)24.9 (18.6)*19.6 (19.4)
Flex spinal inclination (°)85.9 (30.2)87.1 (25.3)86.7 (26.8)
Ext thoracic kyphosis angle (°)32.7 (10.4)26.7 (15.0)28.8 (13.8)
Ext lumbar kyphosis angle (°)−18.5 (9.9)−5.7 (20.7)*−10.0 (18.7)
Ext spinal inclination (°)−14.8 (11.9)−5.2 (18.3)*−8.4 (17.0)

*Significant difference versus LSS alone group ( 𝑃 < . 0 5 by unpaired t-test).
LSS: lumbar spinal stenosis; CLBP: chronic low back pain; upr: upright position; flex: flexed position; ext: extended position.
Data are presented as mean (SD).