Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Pain Research and Treatment
Volume 2011, Article ID 362396, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/362396
Clinical Study

Pain and Efficacy Rating of a Microprocessor-Controlled Metered Injection System for Local Anaesthesia in Minor Hand Surgery

1The Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Health Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada N6A 4L6
2Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 4L6
3Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada N6A 4L6
4Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada N6A 5C1
5Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada N6A 5C1

Received 23 October 2010; Accepted 21 March 2011

Academic Editor: Michael G. Irwin

Copyright © 2011 André S. Nimigan and Bing Siang Gan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. J. Friedman and M. N. Hochman, “A 21st century computerized injection system for local pain control,” Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 995–1000, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. W. Nicholson, T. G. Berry, J. B. Summitt, C. H. Yuan, and T. M. Witten, “Pain perception and utility: a comparison of the syringe and computerized local injection techniques,” General Dentistry, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 167–173, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Hochman, D. Chiarello, C. B. Hochman, R. Lopatkin, and S. Pergola, “Computerized local anesthetic delivery vs. traditional syringe technique. Subjective pain response,” The New York State Dental Journal, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 24–29, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. M. Palm, U. Kirkegaard, and S. Poulsen, “The wand versus traditional injection for mandibular nerve block in children and adolescents: perceived pain and time of onset,” Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 481–484, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  5. J. Versloot, J. S. Veerkamp, and J. Hoogstraten, “Computerized anesthesia delivery system vs. traditional syringe: comparing pain and pain-related behavior in children,” European Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 488–493, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. L. San Martin-Lopez, L. D. Garrigos-Esparza, G. Torre-Delgadillo et al., “Clinical comparison of pain perception rates between computerized local anesthesia and conventional syringe in pediatric patients,” Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 239–243, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Ram and B. Peretz, “The assessment of pain sensation during local anesthesia using a computerized local anesthesia (Wand) and a conventional syringe,” Journal of Dentistry for Children, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 130–133, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. Y. Tan, P. Vukasin, I. D. Chin et al., “The WAND local anesthetic delivery system: a more pleasant experience for anal anesthesia,” Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 686–689, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. H. True, Fabfp, Abhrs, R. M. Elliott, and Abhrs, “Microprocessor-controlled local anesthesia versus the conventional syringe technique in hair transplantation,” Dermatologic Surgery, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 463–468, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. K. Yiannakopoulos, “Carpal ligament decompression under local anaesthesia: the effect of lidocaine warming and alkalinisation on infiltration pain,” Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 32–34, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  11. M. Krochak and N. Friedman, “Using a precision-metered injection system to minimize dental injection anxiety,” Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 137–140, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. F. Robison, R. B. Mayhew, R. D. Cowan, and R. J. Hawley, “Comparative study of deflection characteristics and fragility of 25-, 27-, and 30-gauge short dental needles,” The Journal of the American Dental Association, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 920–924, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. N. Hochman and M. J. Friedman, “In vitro study of needle deflection: a linear insertion technique versus a bidirectional rotation insertion technique,” Quintessence International, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 33–39, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. N. Hochman and M. J. Friedman, “An in vitro study of needle force penetration comparing a standard linear insertion to the new bidirectional rotation insertion technique,” Quintessence International, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 789–796, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus