Review Article
Etiology and Use of the “Hanging Drop” Technique: A Review
Table 1
Risk of bias assessment using the CBRG criteria.
| | Gil et al. (2008) [3] | Moon et al. (2010) [4] | Usubiaga et al. (1967) [5] |
| Was the method of randomization adequate? | Yes | Yes | No | Was the treatment allocation concealed? | No | No | No | Was the patient blinded to the intervention? | No | No | No | Was the care provider blinded to the intervention? | No | No | No | Was the outcome assessor blinded to the intervention? | No | Yes | No | Was the drop-out rate described and acceptable? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Were all randomized participants analyzed in the group to which they were allocated? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Were the groups similar at baseline regarding the most important prognostic indicators? | No | Unsure | No | Were cointerventions avoided or similar? | Yes | Yes | Unsure | Was the compliance acceptable in all groups? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Was the timing of the outcome assessment similar in all groups? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|