Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Pain Research and Treatment
Volume 2016, Article ID 5862931, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5862931
Clinical Study

Effective Concentration of Lidocaine Plus Fentanyl for Caudal Block in Patients Undergoing Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy

1Department of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
2Department of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 71 Xinmin Street, Changchun, Jilin 130021, China

Received 25 April 2016; Revised 17 August 2016; Accepted 23 August 2016

Academic Editor: Ke Ren

Copyright © 2016 Jinguo Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. Aus, J.-E. Damber, and J. Hugosson, “Prostate biopsy and anaesthesia: an overview,” Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 124–129, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Clements, O. U. Aideyan, G. J. Griffiths, and W. B. Peeling, “Side effects and patient acceptability of transrectal biopsy of the prostate,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 125–126, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. N. Collins, S. N. Lloyd, M. Hehir, and G. B. McKelvie, “Multiple transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies—true morbidity and patient acceptance,” British Journal of Urology, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 460–463, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Irani, F. Fournier, D. Bon, E. Gremmo, B. Doré, and J. Aubert, “Patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate,” British Journal of Urology, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 608–610, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. MacCagnano, V. Scattoni, M. Roscigno et al., “Anaesthesia in transrectal prostate biopsy: which is the most effective technique?” Urologia Internationalis, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. W. J. Dixon, “Staircase bioassay: the up-and-down method,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 47–50, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. L. Pace and M. P. Stylianou, “Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a precis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research,” Anesthesiology, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 144–152, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. J. Choi, J. Y. Kim, D. Lee, Y. J. Chang, N. R. Cho, and H. J. Kwak, “Male patients require higher optimal effect-site concentrations of propofol during i- gel insertion withdexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg,” BMC Anesthesiology, vol. 16, article 20, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. C. A. Adebamowo, “Caudal anaesthesia in the clinical assessment of painful anal lesions,” African Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 133–134, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. I. Okeke, “Experience with caudal block regional anesthesia for transurethral resection of the prostate gland,” West African Journal of Medicine, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 280–281, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. F. Ye, Y. X. Feng, and J. J. Lin, “A ropivacaine-lidocaine combination for caudal blockade in haemorrhoidectomy,” Journal of International Medical Research, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 307–313, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. Li, Y. Zhou, H. Chen, and Z. Feng, “The effect of sex on the minimum local analgesic concentration of ropivacaine for caudal anesthesia in anorectal surgery,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 110, no. 5, pp. 1490–1493, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. M. Cesur, T. Yapanoglu, A. F. Erdem, I. Ozbey, H. A. Alici, and Y. Aksoy, “Caudal analgesia for prostate biopsy,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 557–561, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. O. Ikuerowo, A. A. Popoola, E. O. Olapade-Olaopa et al., “Caudal block anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy,” International Urology and Nephrology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 19–22, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Horinaga, J. Nakashima, and T. Nakanoma, “Efficacy compared between caudal block and periprostatic local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy,” Urology, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 348–351, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. F. Mulroy, Regional Anesthesia: An Illustrated Procedural Guide, vol. 125, Brown and Company, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1996.
  17. D. B. Scott, Techniques of Regional Anaesthesia, vol. 184, Appleton & Lange, Geneva, Switzerland, 1995.