Research Article
iACT-CEL: A Feasibility Trial of a Face-to-Face and Internet-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Intervention for Chronic Pain in Singapore
Table 5
Summary of participants’ responses on program acceptability and treatment satisfaction.
| | () | Disagree (%) | Neither agree nor disagree (%) | Agree (%) |
| | Information on the program was easy to understand | 1 (3.0) | 6 (18.2) | 23 (69.7) | | Information was personally relevant | 1 (3.0) | 3 (9.1) | 26 (78.8) | | Program was easy to use | 1 (3.0) | 4 (12.1) | 25 (75.8) | | Interactive exercises were helpful | 1 (3.0) | 4 (12.1) | 25 (75.7) | | Ability to communicate to the therapist via e-mail was important | 0 (0.0) | 14 (42.4) | 16 (48.5) | | Ability to apply techniques learnt in daily life | 1 (3.0) | 8 (24.2) | 21 (63.6) | | No technical difficulties were experienced | 7 (21.2) | 3 (9.1) | 20 (60.6) | | Duration of program was just right | 3 (9.1) | 1 (3.0) | 26 (78.8) | | Program likely to help people with chronic pain manage more effectively | 1 (3.0) | 6 (18.2) | 23 (69.7) |
| | Treatment satisfaction | Extremely unsatisfied (%) | Unsatisfied (%) | Neutral (%) | Satisfied (%) | Extremely satisfied (%) |
| | Therapist’s response time | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 7 (21.2) | 12 (36.4) | 11 (33.3) | | Quality of interaction with therapist | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (9.1) | 18 (54.5) | 9 (27.3) | | Online program | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (18.2) | 17 (51.5) | 7 (21.2) | | Total treatment (including face-to-face sessions) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (9.1) | 18 (54.5) | 9 (27.3) |
|
|
