Authors country Year Type of study Patient Burns Type of laser Doppler device Surgery needed Findings Limitation Green et al. [4 ], USA 1988 Observational Study 10 13 LD flowmetry Nonspecified type of LD scanner 6 Statistically significant difference in LD value between healing and nonhealing group Lack of description of methodology of measurement O’Reilly et al. [5 ], USA 1989 Prospective cohort LD measurements did not influence clinical judgement 41 59 LD flowmetry Laser flow blood perfusion monitor BPM403 8
LD < 1.4 PPV 98.4%, LD > 1.4 deemed superficial and will heal within 21 days 43 > 1.4 LD burned areas excised and grafted Day of measurement not specified Waxman et al. [7 ], USA 1989 Prospective cohort LDI within 48 h of burn Indeterminate depth only 33 51 LD Flowmetry Laser flow blood perfusion monitor BPM403 18 100% specificity re: healing if flow >6 mL/100 g/min NPV 75% TBSA not specified Niazi et al. [9 ], UK 1993 Prospective cohortBurns of indeterminate depth Children excluded 13 13 LD imaging Newcastle laser Doppler scanner 7 Good correlation of LDI with histological assessment No statistical analysis Atiles et al. [8 ], USA 1995 Prospective cohort 21 86 LD flowmetry Perimed PF4000 33 <40 PU; Sen: 0.46, Spec: 1.0, PPV: 1.0, NPV: 0.85 >80 PU; Sen: 0.85, Spec: 0.82, PPV: 0.79, NPV: 0.87 No histological assessment. No burn cause identified Park et al. [10 ], Korea
1998 Prospective cohort 44 100 LD flowmetry Periflux system 4001 Not specified Primary outcome; healing at 2 weeks >100 PU 90% PPV 10–100 PU 96% PPV <10 100% PPV Surgery not specified—just said not healed 2 weeks Banwell et al. [11 ], UK 1999 Prospective cohort 30 n/a LD flowmetry and LD imaging Moor LDI scanner Not specified Good correlation LDI results and histology No stats Pape et al. [12 ], UK 2001 Prospective cohort Intermediate depth 48–72 h of presentation 48 76 LD imaging Moor LDI scanner 25 97% PPV of LDI compared with 70% of clinical assessment Kloppenberg et al. [13 ], Netherlands 2001 Prospective cohort 16 22 LD imaging PIM 1.0 laser Doppler perfusion imager (Lisca development AB) 6 Sensitivity 100% and specificity 93.8% on day 4 Invalid statistical analysis Holland et al. [14 ], Australia 2002 Prospective cohortPaediatric burns only 12 days cut-off point for healing 57 57 LD imaging Moor LDI V 3.1 17 Deep dermal; partial thickness Clinical examination 66% LDI 90%; clinical 71%, LDI 96% Mobility of children No validated endpoint Jeng et al. [15 ], USA 2003 Prospective blinded trialBurns of indeterminate depth 23 41 LD imaging Moor LDI-VR 7 56% agreement between clinician and LDI 71.4% accuracy of surgeon compared to histological diagnosis 8/18 burns deemed superficial by LDI but required grafting Mileski et al. [16 ], USA 2003 Prospective cohort 56 159 LD flowmetry PF 4001 laser Doppler flowmeter 53 Sensitivity: 68% Specificity: 88% PPV: 81% NPV: 76% Clinical assessment once versus serial LDI
Riordan et al. [17 ], USA 2003 Prospective blinded trial Surgeon blinded to LDI result 22 35 PIM #II LISCA 24 At threshold value of 1.3 Sensitivity: 95% Specificity: 94% La Hei et al. [18 ], Australia 2006 Prospective blinded trialNo clinical assessment done Assessment by images and LDI only 31 50 LD imaging Moor LDI V2 22 Sensitivity: 97% Specificity: 100% Statistical analysis and small number McGill et al. [19 ], UK 2007 Prospective blinded comparison 20 27 LD imaging Moor LDI versus PW Allen videomicroscope: transcutaneous microscopy 10 LDI: sensitivity 100% VM: sensitivity for SPT 100% No histological assessment Expert user of VM VM not tolerated by children Hoeksema et al. [20 ], Belgium 2009 Prospective blinded trialEarly assessment of burns using LDI Intermediate depths Day 0 , 1 , 3 , 5 , 8 , and 21 40 40 LD imaging Moor LDI 12 Sensitivity increases with days after burn. Statistically significantly better than clinical assessment from day 3 Sensitivity: 100% Specificity: 92.3% 2 cases that required surgery and histology showed that burn wound was superficial in nature Cho et al. [21 ], Republic of Korea 2009 Prospective cohort studyPaediatric burns Only burns of indeterminate depth 48–72 h 103 181 LD imaging Periscan PIM 3 n/a Healing by 14 days at PU of 250 Sensitivity 80.6% and Specificity 76.9% No confirmation of superficial nature of burn with histology Mill et al. [22 ], Australia 2009 Prospective cohort study Paediatric burns Testing different effect of dressings 48 85 LD imaging Moor LDI2 6 Scans within 24 h accurately predict outcome Colour palette corresponds to healing time. Cut-off of 14 days No blinding Wide range of scanning time 0–120 h Kim et al. [23 ], Australia 2010 Case-control trial Only patients requiring grafting <16 years 196 196 LD imaging Moor LDI2 196 Reduction in decision for surgery in LDI group 8.9 days versus 11.6 days in control group ( ) No randomisation Merz et al. [24 ], Germany 2010 Retrospective cohort study 28 173 LD flowmetry Laser Doppler O2C 88 Sensitivity: 80.6% Specificity: 88.2% PPV: 93.1% NPV: 69.8% No histological assessment Nguyen et al. [25 ], Australia 2010 Prospective cohortPaediatric population Two groups; < and >48 h presentation 400 637 LD imaging Moor LDI2-BI 89 <48 h Sensitivity: 78% Specificity: 74% >48 h Sensitivity: 75% Specificity 85% No histological assessment in patients operated on Lindahl et al. [26 ], Sweden
2013 Prospective cohort 14 45 LD imaging Laser Speckle contrast imager (Perimed AB) n/a Higher perfusion in burns healing in less than 14 days compared to more than 14 days from day 0 from burn. Small sample of patients No gold standard to compare to Menon et al. [27 ], Australia 2012 Retrospective cohortFriction burns in paediatric population 36 36 Not specified 12 64% accuracy of LDI predicting burn outcome Small sample of patients No gold standard to compare to Pape et al. [28 ], Multicentre 2012 Prospective cohort 137 433 LD Imaging Moor LDI ns Development of validated colour code for interpretation and link to burn outcome Park et al. [29 ], Korea
2013 Retrospective cohort 96 101 LD imaging Periscan PIM3 (Perimed AB) 46 Cut-off point of 154.7PU Sensitivity: 78.3 Specificity: 92.7 Stewart et al. [30 ], Canada 2012 Prospective blinded control trial 38 105 LD imaging Moor LDI 2-B1 64 LDI has PPV > 90% accurate in determining need for grafting