Research Article

Predictors of Nasal Obstruction: Quantification and Assessment Using Multiple Grading Scales

Table 2

(a) Distribution of nasal physical exam findings and association with NOSE scores. (b) Additional nasal physical exam findings and association with NOSE scores.
(a)

Percent total
( = number of patients)
NOSE score by subgroup
(mean ± SD)
value
(one-way ANOVA)
= statistical significance

External nasal deformity
 Grade 1: none82.5% ()30.1 ± 22.8 = 0.0149
 Grade 2: mild9.2% ()34.5 ± 25.3
 Grade 3: moderate7.9% ()48.5 ± 30.2
 Grade 4: severe0.4% ()35.0

Nasal septum deviation
 Grade 1: 0 to 25% deflection53.3% ()27.7 ± 22.0 = 0.0024
 Grade 2: 26–50% deflection 31.6% ()33.5 ± 22.9
 Grade 3: 51–75% deflection8.3% ()43.3 ± 32.8
 Grade 4: 76–100% deflection6.7% ()45.9 ± 25.4

Internal nasal valve angleRightLeftRightLeftRightLeft
 Grade 1: <5 degrees3.8% ()4.2% ()66.1 ± 18.358.0 ± 27.4 < 0.0001 < 0.0001
 Grade 2: 5 to <10 degrees18.1% ()18.1% ()44.3 ± 25.544.1 ± 24.8
 Grade 3: 10 to <15 degrees51.9% ()53.6% ()29.1 ± 21.928.9 ± 21.5
 Grade 4: 15 or more degrees26.2% ()24.1% ()24.8 ± 21.625.7 ± 22.6

Internal nasal valve collapseRightLeftRightLeftRightLeft
 Grade 1: no collapse74.1% ()74.2% ()No significant difference between groups = 0.4210 = 0.1053
 Grade 2: mild collapse ≤ 33%17.9% ()18.3% ()
 Grade 3: moderate collapse = 34–66%7.5% ()6.7% ()
 Grade 4: severe collapse ≥ 67% 0.4% ()8.3% ()

Inferior turbinate sizeRightLeftRightLeftRightLeft
 Grade 1: 0–25% AP nasal airway space27.9% ()25.0% ()No significant difference between groups = 0.9472 = 0.1618
 Grade 2: 26–50% AP nasal airway space24.1% ()27.1% ()
 Grade 3: 51–75% AP nasal airway space30.0% ()32.9% ()
 Grade 4: 76–100% AP nasal airway space17.9% ()15.0% ()

(b)

Subgroup
% total or mean ± SD
( = number)
NOSE score
mean ± SD or Pearson’s
value, statistical test
‡ (one-way ANOVA)
(Pearson correlation)
= statistical significance

Nasal obstruction visual analog scale (NO-VAS): 0–100
 Bilateral (both nostrils open)22.3 ± 23.8 = 0.38; moderate positive relationship < 0.0001,
 Left nostril (cover right) 27.6 ± 28.0 = 0.37; moderate positive relationship < 0.0001,
 Right nostril (cover left) 23.0 ± 25.7 = 0.21; weak positive relationship,

Cottle maneuver effect on nasal airflow
 Grade 1: no improvement 11.1% ()15.0 ± 17.9 = 0.0087, ‡
 Grade 2: mild improvement39.6% ()30.3 ± 22.9
 Grade 3: moderate improvement25.7% ()37.4 ± 24.1
 Grade 4: significant improvement23.6% ()37.4 ± 27.2

Classification of external nasal deformities
 C-shaped26.7% ()No significant difference between groups = 0.8352, ‡
 Reverse C-shaped60.0% ()
 S-shaped13.3% ()
 Reverse S-shaped0% ()

Classification of septal deviations: cephalocaudal dimension
 C-shaped51.4% ()No significant difference between groups = 0.5270, ‡
 Reverse C-shaped36.8% ()
 S-shaped7.4% ()
 Reverse S-shaped4.4% ()

Classification of septal deviations: anteroposterior dimension
 C-shaped50.0% ()No significant difference between groups = 0.6841, ‡
 Reverse C-shaped36.0% ()
 S-shaped10.9% ()
 Reverse S-shaped3.1% ()