Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Sarcoma
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 614179, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/614179
Research Article

Wiki-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Adult Onset Sarcoma: A New Paradigm in Sarcoma Evidence

1Australasian Sarcoma Study Group, Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia
2Cancer Council Australia, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia

Received 8 October 2014; Accepted 14 January 2015

Academic Editor: Chandrajit Premanand Raut

Copyright © 2015 S. J. Neuhaus et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. A. Clark, C. Fisher, I. Judson, and J. Meirion Thomas, “Soft-tissue sarcomas in adults,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 353, no. 7, pp. 701–711, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. A. Potter, R. Woods, T. Bessen, G. Farshid, D. Roder, and S. J. Neuhaus, “Incidence and reconstructive demand of sarcoma in Australia: first national data analysis,” ANZ Journal of Surgery, vol. 84, supplement 1, pp. 140–165, 2014, abstract no. 21859. View at Google Scholar
  3. T. Ruhstaller, H. Roe, B. Thürlimann, and J. J. Nicoll, “The multidisciplinary meeting: an indispensable aid to communication between different specialities,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 42, no. 15, pp. 2459–2462, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. ESMO/European Sarcoma Network Working Group, “Bone sarcomas: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 23, supplement 7, pp. vii100–vii109, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. ESMO/European Sarcoma Network Working Group, “Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 23, supplement 7, pp. vii92–vii99, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. NICE, Guidance on Cancer Studies. Improving Outcomes for People with Sarcoma, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2006.
  7. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Soft Tissue Sarcoma 2013, http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp.
  8. H. Bastian, P. Glasziou, and I. Chalmers, “Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up?” PLoS Medicine, vol. 7, no. 9, Article ID e1000326, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. I. N. Olver and J. J. von Dincklage, “It is time for clinical guidelines to enter the digital age,” The Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 199, no. 9, pp. 569–570, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. L. Francke, M. C. Smit, A. J. E. de Veer, and P. Mistiaen, “Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review,” BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 8, article 38, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Cancer Council Australia Clinical Guidelines Network, Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines Using Cancer Council Australia's Cancer Guidelines Wiki, Handbook 2013 for Section Authors and the Guideline Working Party, Cancer Council Australia, 2013.
  12. J. L. Bender, L. A. O'Grady, A. Deshpande et al., “Collaborative authoring: a case study of the use of a wiki as a tool to keep systematic reviews up to date,” Open Medicine, vol. 5, article e201, pp. 201–208, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Adult Onset Sarcoma, 2013, http://wiki.cancer.org.au/australia/Guidelines:Sarcoma.
  14. G. Tsafnat, A. Dunn, P. Glasziou, and E. Coiera, “The automation of systematic reviews,” British Medical Journal, vol. 346, article f139, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. P. Kerfoot, M. C. Kearney, D. Connelly, and M. L. Ritchey, “Interactive spaced education to assess and improve knowledge of clinical practice guidelines: a randomized controlled trial,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 249, no. 5, pp. 744–749, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. P. Kerfoot, E. V. Lawler, G. Sokolovskaya, D. Gagnon, and P. R. Conlin, “Durable improvements in prostate cancer screening from online spaced education: a randomized controlled trial,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 472–478, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Bleyer, M. Montello, T. Budd, and S. Saxman, “National survival trends of young adults with sarcoma: lack of progress is associated with lack of clinical trial participation,” Cancer, vol. 103, no. 9, pp. 1891–1897, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Central Intelligence Agency, The World Factbook, Central Intelligence Agency, Langley, Va, USA, 2013, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2004rank.html.
  19. J. Lewin, A. Puri, R. Quek et al., “Management of sarcoma in the asia-pacific region: resource-stratified guidelines,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. e562–e570, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus