Research Article
Ovary-Sparing Radiation Planning Techniques Can Achieve Ovarian Dose Reduction for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Buttock and Thigh
Table 2
Dosimetric comparisons of standard plans and ovary-sparing plans (
).
| ā | Standard plan | Ovary-sparing plan | value |
| Mean bilateral ovary dose (MBOD, cGy) (SD) | 652 (100) | 483 (84) | 0.007 | Ipsilateral ovary dose, mean (cGy) (SD) | 1072 (1606) | 888 (1596) | 0.03 | Contralateral ovary dose, mean (cGy) (SD) | 232 (460) | 78 (86) | 0.075 | Mean bone dose (cGy) (SD) | 161 (77) | 165 (79) | 0.19 | Mean bone V50 (SD) | 6.86% (7.70) | 8.45% (10.1) | 0.049 | Conformity index, mean (SD) | 1.12 (0.07) | 1.19 (0.13) | 0.009 |
|
|
MBOD: mean bilateral ovary dose; SD: standard deviation; cGy: centigray.
|