Review Article

A Critical Review of the Impact of Sarcoma on Psychosocial Wellbeing

Table 6

Comparison to a reference value1,2.

First authorQuality of life3Domains3

Veenstra et al. [101]4PF, RP
Eiser et al. [44]4PF, RP, SF, vitality, pain, GH
Malo et al. [64]4PF, RP
Rodl et al. [85]=
Koopman et al. [61]−(1997)
+(2002)
MF, autonomy
Cognition, SF, NE
Gerber et al. [51]=
Hoffmann et al. [59]=
Thijssens et al. [99]3PF, RP
Aksnes et al. [29]
Bekkering et al. [34]
+
PCS
MCS
Paredes et al. [74]4-PF, RP, GH, SF
Barrera et al. [31]5
Forni et al. [49]4
+
PF
MH
Reichardt et al. [82]ns
Sun et al. [95]ns
Liu et al. [63]
van Riel et al. [100]PWB, autonomy, SE, SS
Gradl et al. [53]+4RS, MH, vitality
Fidler et al. [48]
Edelmann et al. [43]4PF, GH
Leiser et al. [62]=
Weiner et al. [103]=
Fernandez-Pineda et al. [47]PCS
Podleska et al. [78]=
Ranft et al. [81]PCS

GH: global health; MCS: mental component score; MF: motor function; MH: mental health; NE: negative emotion; ns: significance not specified; PCS: physical component score; PF: physical function; PWB: physical wellbeing; RP: role-physical; RS: role-social; SE: school environment; SF: social function; SS: social support/peers. 1Minus (−): poorer in comparison; plus (+): better; equals (=): no difference. 2Reference values either supplied with the measure or collected from noncancer controls as part of the study. 3Result based on overall or summary scores; if these were not provided, result at domain score level was provided (QLQ-C30 functional scales only). 4Total and/or summary scores can be calculated with the measure used, but this was not reported. 5Three quality of life measures used, all giving different results.