Research Article

Prognostic Significance of Bone Metastasis in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients Receiving Palliative Systemic Therapy: An Explorative, Retrospective Pooled Analysis of the EORTC-Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG) Database

Table 3

Cox model for the adjusted effect of bone metastasis on OS per line of treatment stratified by study.

ParameterLevelsHazard ratio for first-line treatment (95% CI) value (first-line)Hazard ratio for second-line or higher treatment (95% CI) value (second line or higher)

Metastasis in boneAbsent1.000.0611.000.533
Present1.33 (0.99, 1.78)1.11 (0.81, 1.52)
Histology type (local review)Angiosarcoma1.001.00
Leiomyosarcoma0.68 (0.39, 1.18)1.03 (0.40, 2.65)
Liposarcoma (all subtypes)0.65 (0.35, 1.20)3.05 (1.10, 8.48)
Others0.89 (0.52, 1.54)2.00 (0.79, 5.04)
Synovial sarcoma0.95 (0.52, 1.73)2.35 (0.91, 6.04)
Age categoryLess than 401.001.00
40 to 501.05 (0.79, 1.41)1.25 (0.86, 1.81)
50 to 701.24 (0.93, 1.66)1.42 (1.05, 1.91)
Older than 701.25 (0.61, 2.55)1.88 (1.21, 2.93)
GenderMale1.001.00
Female0.95 (0.77, 1.17)0.89 (0.70, 1.13)
Tumour gradeLow/intermediate1.001.00
High1.38 (1.11, 1.71)1.39 (1.11, 1.75)
Metastasis in liverAbsent1.001.00
Present1.47 (1.11, 1.95)1.04 (0.79, 1.36)
Metastasis in lymph nodesAbsent1.001.00
Present1.25 (0.99, 1.56)1.34 (1.02, 1.77)
Metastasis in lungAbsent1.001.00
Present1.25 (0.98, 1.59)1.14 (0.88, 1.49)
Metastasis in other sitesAbsent1.001.00
Present1.53 (1.20, 1.95)1.36 (1.07, 1.73)
Metastasis in soft-tissue (primary or other soft-tissue invasive)Absent1.001.00
Present1.09 (0.86, 1.38)1.25 (0.98, 1.60)
Site of primary tumourExtremities1.001.00
Abdomen1.27 (0.90, 1.78)1.10 (0.78, 1.54)
Others1.01 (0.73, 1.39)1.08 (0.72, 1.62)
Thorax1.00 (0.68, 1.47)1.29 (0.90, 1.85)
Visceral1.21 (0.88, 1.65)1.25 (0.89, 1.77)
Performance status01.001.00
11.67 (1.36, 2.05)1.70 (1.34, 2.17)
Time between histological diagnosis and registration/randomisationLess than a year1.001.00
1-2 years0.78 (0.58, 1.06)0.94 (0.68, 1.30)
More than 2 years0.61 (0.47, 0.79)0.60 (0.44, 0.80)

Note that 977 (94.5%) of the patients were analysed due to some missing values.