Table of Contents
Scholarly Research Exchange
Volume 2009, Article ID 108498, 2 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.3814/2009/108498
Case Report

Atypical Hyperperfusion Encephalopathy in Post-Carotid Stenting

1Neurology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29100 Piacenza, Italy
2Department of Neuroscience, Clinic of Neurology, S. Chiara Hospital, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
3Neuroradioloy Unit, S. Chiara Hospital, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy

Received 22 July 2008; Revised 13 April 2009; Accepted 22 April 2009

Copyright © 2009 Nicola Morelli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. B. Schwartz, “Hyperperfusion encephalopathies: hypertensive encephalopathy and related conditions,” Neurologist, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 22–34, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. S. Macdonald, “Brain injury secondary to carotid intervention,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 219–231, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  3. J. G. Heckmann, B. Neundörfer, C. J. G. Lang, and D. Werner, “Hyperdensity of cortex with a swollen hemisphere: what happened?,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 149–150, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. G. Dangas, L. H. Monsein, R. Laureno et al., “Transient contrast encephalopathy after carotid artery stenting,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 111–113, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. A. A. Penn, D. F. Schomer, and G. K. Steinberg, “Imaging studies of cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy: case report,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 133–137, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  6. E. G. Grant, C. B. Benson, G. L. Moneta et al., “Carotid artery stenosis: grayscale and Doppler ultrasound diagnosis—Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference,” Ultrasound Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 190–198, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. H. J. M. Barnett, D. W. Taylor, M. Eliasziw et al., “Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 339, no. 20, pp. 1415–1425, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. E. Tatli, M. Buyuklu, and A. Altun, “An unusual but dramatic complication of coronary angiography: transient cortical blindness,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. e4–e6, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  9. R. Parry, J. R. Rees, and P. Wilde, “Transient cortical blindness after coronary angiography,” British Heart Journal, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 563–564, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. J. M. Caille and M. Allard, “Neurotoxicity of hydrosoluble iodine contrast media,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 23, pp. S210–S212, 1988. View at Google Scholar