The Accuracy of Electrical Impedance Tomography for Breast Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 1

Summary of studies included in the meta-analysis.

ID	Author	Year	Sample size	Age of participants	Country	Sensitivity %	Specificity %
1	Melloul et al. [23]	1999	121	42 to 70	Israel	72.2	67
2	Malich et al. [24]	2000	58	—	Germany	75.9	72.4
3	Malich et al. [25]	2001	100	—	Germany	81	63
4	Wersebe et al. [26]	2002	129	Mean = 55	Germany	62	69
5	Fuchsjaeger et al. [27]	2005	128	21 to 89	Austria	94.6	74.7
6	Szabo et al. [28]	2005	145	33 to 92	Sweden	86	49
7	Stojadinovic et al. [29]	2006	1550	30 to 45	USA	38	95.1
8	Stojadinovic et al. [30]	2007	2155	30 to 45	USA	26.4	94.7
9	Wang et al. [31]	2010	286	25 to 45	China	86.7	72.9
10	Amin et al. [7]	2014	19	17 to 55	Bangladesh	75	87
11	Daglar et al. [32]	2016	25	18 to 85	Turkey	75	77.78
12	Zhenggui et al. [33]	2017	771	18 to 83	China	92.1	98.9