The Efficacy of Low-Kilovoltage X-Rays Intraoperative Radiation as Boost for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Table 3
Assessment of cohort studies with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).
Study
Selection
Comparability
Outcome
Quality score
Representative treatment group
Representative reference group
Assignment for treatment
Outcome unpresented
Assessment of outcome
Long enough follow-up
Adequate follow-up
Blank et al.
★
☆
★
★
☆☆
★
☆
★
★★★★★
Wenz et al.
★
☆
★
★
☆☆
★
☆
★
★★★★★
Kolburg et al.
☆
★
★
★
★★
★
☆
★
★★★★★★★
Pez M et al.
★
☆
★
★
☆☆
★
★
★
★★★★★★
Valente et al.
★
★
★
★
★★
★
★
★
★★★★★★★★★
Chang et al.
★
☆
★
★
☆☆
★
☆
★
★★★★★
Stoian et al.
★
☆
★
★
☆☆
★
☆
★
★★★★★
Onthong et al.
★
☆
★
★
☆☆
★
☆
★
★★★★★
Sarria et al.
★
☆
★
★
☆☆
★
☆
★
★★★★★
Hochhertz et al.
★
☆
★
★
☆☆
★
★
★
★★★★★★
Cho et al.
★
☆
★
★
☆☆
★
☆
★
★★★★★
Comparability variables: 1 = age; 2 = tumor size; 3 = lymph node status; 4 = tumor grade; 5 = hormone receptor status; 6 = HER2 status. If all characteristics were comparable, two stars; if two or three characteristics were comparable, one star; otherwise, no star.